The Good Stuff.
11.15.2022
We have successfully completed our still life in studio assignment today. That means we get to progress to the next level... Oh wait. This is not a video game...
11.14.2022
Prepping for tomorrow's shoot, and the shoot the next day and the shoot on Thursday. Hmmmm. A lot to keep track of...
We're photographing small, metal, medical products tomorrow. The kind you need a good macro lens to do right. We'll also be shooting some products that have fine catheters/wires that will need to show up when the images are dropped out against white. On Wednesday we're photographing the models we've been casting over the last two weeks. They'll be dressed in scrubs and will play the roles of medical pros, even to the point of inserting stuff into dummy cadavers (no. not real dead people!). The two shooting days are for the same client but could not be more different. One with intensely small products and in the quiet studio. The other with models and make-up and big locations. Oh boy.
After much research and playing around I've decided to shoot the products (day one) with a camera that tethers to my MacBook Pro laptop. I've spent a lot of time working with the Lumix Tether software in the last week and it is exactly what I need on a couple levels. It's rock solid running on the MacBook Pro. It's a slim program that seems very efficient. It loads Panasonic raw files very quickly. It will allow me to write files to either the Laptop, or the in-camera cards, or to both. In fact, I think it will allow me to set up the two in-camera cards to record simulaneously, backing each other up, and still write to a folder on the laptop. So, a three way back up while shooting.
I looked at the demo version of Capture One rev. 23 but it only allows for file ingestion into its mysterious folders and not to two sources at once. Remember all those folks who were screaming and crying about only getting a single card slot on their cameras? Why doesn't the same emotion hold true for tethered images? Just curious...
I'm using the Sigma 70mm f2.8 macro Art lens as my primary product lens. I have an older Nikon 105mm f2.8 macro lens sitting in the drawer as a back-up. It's a nice lens as well. Maybe not quite as capable of the detail the Sigma can capture but it's close.
The Leica software for tethering that I could find is a bust and the plug-in they made back in 2019 for Lightroom of that age doesn't play well with the current version of Lightroom. I could use one of the Leicas with Capture One but it's just rudimentary support with no live view and very little control of the camera itself. Not that it matters much since I would use the same lens on the Leicas...
Instead I am using the Panasonic S5. Twenty four megapixels from a really good sensor is more than enough resolution and the camera, like the tethering software, is rock solid. I used the Panasonic S5 a lot in the last ten days and I feel right at home with it right now. That counts for a lot. I've got two fast SD cards in the S5 and the computer I'm tethering to has a 1TB SSD that's pretty spiffy. It's wired together with USB 3.1 so I can't think that I'll be waiting much for images to pop up. And that's wonderful. I remember tethering with the ancient Kodak DCS760 C cameras and a G4 laptop and you could take a coffee break waiting for files to wend their way across a SCSI connection. And by the time they did you'd need to change the camera battery again. Ah, those were the days when pure persistence in the face of crappy technology really was the main thing that separated professionals from wannabes.
Since we're shooting in my studio tomorrow there are lots and lots of cameras sitting around just in case something craps out. My secondary/failsafe set up is to press the Leica SL2 into service along with an Atomos Sumo monitor hooked together with a stout HDMI cable. It's a fast set up as well and will give us more than enough clarity to assure everyone that the composition and basic exposures are on the money.
I wish that Sigma made tethering software for the Sigma fp because it would be nice to sub that camera in for a set of files for a direct comparison to the images from the S5. If you read this and you know that Sigma snuck in some tethering software that I couldn't find, please let me know right away!!! Such a nice camera. Even if you are only using it for color shots.
Lighting for the products tomorrow? I'm using two NanLite LED units. One is a 300 and the other is a 200. If we need additional sources we've got three Godox SL60s on one shelf and two Godox SL150ii lights on another. I'm blasting them into fairly small soft boxes since our products are pretty small to begin with.
For the still life stuff we can shoot at ISO 100 and f16 all day long. If we don't need the depth of field we'll drop down to f11 and try to avoid diffraction effects. Works for me. And triggering the camera from the laptop eliminates a major source of camera shake.
I'm now officially set for tomorrow's shoot. I've cleaned the guest bathroom, gotten the old Krups coffee maker polished up, bought snacks (both healthy and naughty) and we're in good shape.
After the shoot tomorrow I'll repack for Wednesday. I have an assistant who just came back from working for a few years in NYC. Up in the city they tend to make every shoot a huge production with lots of entourage. And, it seems from our chat, that most people are still shooting with flash... Commercial photography theater.
After our chat I had a bit of trepidation. Models on location. In a medical/tech environment. Should I be shooting with strobes as well? I pulled out the two big 400 watt, plug-in-the-wall monolights and the three Godox AD200 Pro lights and gave it all a good, long thought. After playing with both sets of lights and also messing around with the LEDs I decided to go continuous. Somebody made a really good case for LEDs about a decade ago in a book. Seemed to make sense then. More so now.
Assist arrives at my place early on Wednesday to help pack up the car and then we head down the road to the client's offices. I dropped by the client's campus this afternoon to do a quick scouting and the place is fantastic. We've got our choice of a 6000 square foot meeting room AND two high tech medical test labs.
We'll meet up with the client and the make-up artist at 8:30 and start our set up. The talent starts arriving at 9:00. I'm sure the assistant will be surprised by the way I mostly operate, which is a bit eccentric. I dislike working with big crews, never have a digital tech on site (since cameras and laptops are pretty easy to parse these days), and I have my own way of lighting stuff and working with talent. I hope the assist is able to chill out, relax and go with the flow. I never like a shoot to be harder than it needs to be.
I had a "Merry Christmas!" moment today during the scouting. The client is going to handle the hard parts of the post processing. I get to edit down the files, color correct them and correct for density, etc. and then hand over 16 bit .PSD files which the client will take and do the drop outs/selections/clipping paths and incorporate our images into their backgrounds. It's like a really nice gift. I should remember to send a "Thank You" card.
The camera package for this day will be similar to the one in the studio. I'll use the S5 and the MacBook Pro but I'm changing lenses to the Leica 24-90mm because it did a beautiful job at the end of last month when we were making environmental portraits for the accounting firm. The back-up/emergency cam will remain the Leica SL2 and the Sumo and I'll bring along the Panasonic 24-105mm zoom for my just in case the Leica lens dies back-up.
Four of the big, beefy LED lights for most of the lighting and a couple smaller ones for accents. I'm eschewing soft boxes in favor of big and medium sized umbrellas mostly just to do something different and tangibly retro with my light. The 200 and 300 series Nanlites will do great bouncing off the ceilings but I do like some directional quality to my main light...
The big tragedy for tomorrow and Wednesday is that I will miss my swim practice on both days. Can't be helped. Well, I guess it could be helped if I just turn down jobs that start before ten a.m. But I was so excited to get this job that I just couldn't pass it up. Nice art director, great budget, fun stuff.
I'm excited about having a real assistant to help me pack it all up at the end of the day and help me drag all the lighting stuff back into the studio. I'll make sure the files are all backed up from both days before I hit the rack on Wednesday night and the gear will sit on the floor in the middle of the studio until such a time as I am motivated to mess with it. If ever.
Thursday is a completely different style of photography and a very, very familiar one at that. In the morning I'm photographing two employees of Texas Appleseed which is a non-profit, legal defense organization trying to make the laws in Texas less brutal and regressive. Things like oversight on zany payday loans. Battling the school-to-prison pipeline in underserved neighborhoods, issues surrounding educational equality. We've been doing their portraits in the same outdoor spot for the last ten or fifteen years. No big set up. Just a light on a stand with a small soft box and maybe a "cutter" to block sun from hitting my subjects directly.
That's the warm-up shoot because later in the day we go to the Four Seasons Hotel for Texas Appleseed's big, yearly fundraising gala. I have shot this event for the past 22 years. This will be year #23.
It's an old school event. During the VIP reception and the following general reception I'll use a flash on camera and try to get as many posed mini-groups, couples, quad-person shots, etc. as humanly possible. I'm not shy and I probably know about half the people who will be attending from seeing them in years past. The head count is around 450 and at $10,000 a table plus a wild live auction the non-profit should do well.
I'm also tasked with photographing all the speakers and award winners as well as any surprise entertainment.
I haven't decided on which camera yet but I do know that I'm planning to use those zany, silly, eccentric Godox Lux Senior flashes. The ones with the retro, fold out, circular reflectors. I'll pack a conventional TTL flash though, just in case. It's typically a fun evening in which I get to circulate non-stop and shoot whatever I want. Making photographs of anyone I find interesting but also getting the images I know the client needs for future fund-raising.
The Four Seasons Hotel are experts at cooking up wonderful food, even if they are doing it for nearly 500 people at a time. I always enjoy the dinner and the wine pairings are always a step above those at lesser galas. I can't wait. It should be another fun evening and a chance to give some lucky camera, lens and flash a really good, concentrated workout. After I finish up the gala pix I'm off the clock for the entire week of Thanksgiving. Already planning a small out and back trip somewhere just to ....... take a few images with one of my cameras. Thinking pointedly about making it back to San Angelo to see what it looks like in November. I keep seeing stuff from the art scene there and I'm always impressed.
I've got a fair amount on my plate right now so don't worry if it takes me a little longer to moderate comments or to disagree with misguided commenters. You're not that lucky yet. I will be back.
A list of cameras I am interested in right now:
Leica is having a promotion right now for former customers. $1300 off the price of either a Leica SL2 or an SL2-S. I tried to buy an SL2-S today after I found the sale (announced by Leica this morning) but they were already sold out of that model. I'll keep trying. I can replace my older SL bodies with two of these....
The Sigma fpL keeps bubbling up to the top of my acquisitive consciousness. Don't know why but I thought I should give one a try considering how much I've enjoyed the basic Sigma fp.
Prices are dropping on Panasonic S5s. I logged onto B&H today and tossed a $1697 priced S5 into my cart and it automatically included the (really quite good) 50mm f1.8 into the cart for free. That's a $450 lens which, if you need the lens, makes the actual price of the S5 (which is a great camera) about $1247, brand new.
Hell of a deal for someone. I bought my S5 from the local store and cajoled a couple extra batteries from them. The free lens would have been an even sweeter deal.
Finally, I am interested in trying out the Nikon Z6ii. A friend bought one on a whim, along with the 50mm f1.8 and he's been raving about the color and overall image quality.
If you have experience with that camera I'd love to hear about it.
Well, it seems from my current schedule that I have not yet been able to convince myself to retire. That's okay, the cash will come in handy if anyone gets stuff back in stock.
Good Hotels are fun. What makes a good hotel?
11.12.2022
The rationalization for bringing along only the 40mm f1.4 Voigtlander lens. Right and wrong.
I didn't exactly buy the Voigtlander 40mm f1.4 lens on a whim. I've been using the Sigma 45mm f2.8 lenses for several years now and I like that focal length niche between 35mm and 50mm lenses. The 45mm is good but the slightly wider 40mm is great. I know. There are some among you who can shoot anything with a 20mm lens, pre-visualize exactly the crop you're going to make weeks from now in post, and happily proceed. But the rest of us don't do that. We like to be flexible but we're even more comfortable if we know where the edges are and we calibrate our compositions to those restraints.
I chose the 40mm V. lens because it covers full frame, is fast enough for low light work (night scenes on city streets) and it features manual focusing. One of the bigger advantages is the small size of the lens.
But my most compelling reason for buying and packing the lens was my research into the "look" of the images made with this lens by various photographers who share their images on the web. The lens is sharp in the center even when used at f1.4. The lens has vignetting (which I like) but it's not so much vignetting that it can't be corrected in post without obvious corner artifacts. The standout optical characteristic is the way it handles colors. It's neutral in contrast but the colors it creates are more saturated; more color rich than the other 40-45mm competitors. And that's something I like.
I know you can add saturation in post but the rendering is different if a certain level of saturation and clear discrimination between colors is built into the optical formula.
This is the lens I took with me to Vancouver and, for the most part, I'm very happy with my choice. It was just the right package for casual shooting on vacation. The only thing I would want to change would be an assurance that the lens was water resistant. I didn't have any issues with the lens but it would be comforting to know that steps had been taken in manufacturing to keep moisture out of the system. But that's all psychological; I'm pretty sure.
In normal practice I never use a "protection" filter on the front of my lenses but in this instance I decided to spring for a B&W filter to use on the front. Just an extra barrier between rain drops, snow and the front element. I'd rather keep wiping drops off the front of a replaceable filter than off the optical element.
Several people have commented that the images from my vacation trip look different than the ones I usually post. I would have to say that a large part of the difference in "look" comes from the characteristics of the lens. The rest come from the use of the lens on a different camera. It's a good combination with the Lumix S5. The only real difference I can think of in the whole shooting process was to consistently shoot cooler (more blue) color corrections than I usually do. And I added fewer changes in post processing --- letting the camera and the lens express themselves more transparently.
I think that because of the influx of so many technical people into the field of digital photography over the last twenty some years there is a belief in the binary nature of everything. This would include that, other than sharpness, all lenses of a particular focal length are interchangeable. Or, if there are big differences between the way two lenses render an image then the extension of the technical-oriented thought process is that the differences can be squashed down and homogenized in post processing.
The follow on thought to that is the assumption that there is a universal color/contrast/D-range look that should be the standard for all images. Which is absurd.
I like the 40mm V. lens not for any particular thing it does brilliantly but for its faults and peccadillos. I love the vignetting. I love the soft flare over small areas of a sharp image when shooting into small light sources. I like image edges that aren't samurai sword sharp. In short, sometimes I like a lens more for its "faults" (which aren't faults but are instead signatures) than I like most lenses for their purported perfection.
There are many cases where high performance and a highly accurate documentation are necessary. An example would be commercial still life photographs of small objects which look best with high sharpness and detail. A "clinical" macro lens would be the choice for those situations... But there are many times when a less accurate lens provides the differentiation from the typical rendering which actually makes the resulting photograph more interesting. More intriguing. Less a slavish documentation.
When I shoot with a lens like the 40mm I know I'm not getting a direct and complete representation of the object being photographed. But I am getting an interpretation of the object and that interpretation is something I understand will happen when I choose a certain lens.
It's part of the reason LensBaby products endure. Or why some older Canon FD lenses are in high demand. It's because of their personalities that people buy them. If they were craving accuracy overall they'd probably choose a Zeiss Otus lens instead.
Clinical versus Personality. There's a place for both and it's dictated by the intended final use of the image.
11.11.2022
It was recently brought to my attention that I've been woefully behind in posting swim information!!!