I never got this gentleman's name but he was downtown, just outside the city council building enjoying a cool, early Spring afternoon. I saw him and thought his eyes were expressive. Just like everyone else I am a little nervous about approaching strangers and asking them if I can make their portrait. But the only alternative to not following through is to stand back, out of the circle of most interest, and shoot a bit wider. And without their collaboration. And that means you get less energy from your subject. It's a tricky choice.
There seems to be either power toward, or a detraction from, success in making the right decisions based on your core intention. At least as far as getting an interesting photograph is concerned. On this particular day I was mostly intending to get photographs that, in combination with other photographs, which would paint a collage for me about the people I come across when I'm out for a pleasant, no-agenda walk.
I guess I could have shot wider. I could have used a telephoto lens. But it was his eyes that drew me to him and that's what I thought should be emphasized in the final image. I also knew that I wanted to have the background drop as far out of focus as possible so the viewer would have no choice but to pay attention to the man's eyes. It would have been easier to stand back, shoot with an 85mm lens and a full frame camera. I would have had more control over the camera-to-subject distance. I could have kept my distance. Stayed in my own circle of comfort.
The camera I had with me was an older, cropped frame (APS-C) Sony and the lens I had on the camera was a fast 50mm. I went with what I had. If I had a bag full of lenses I could have stopped and changed to something longer but I know I would not have taken the time because all permissions from strangers feel like they come with a time constraint attached. After all, you are pulling them away from their own self-guided free time. Their own schedule. Their own safe space. So I kept the lens I arrived with.
Whatever dialog we had together is lost to the mists of time. I try to be honest and not fawning. I might have said I was drawn to the power and calmness of his eyes. But I just as likely smiled and said I would really like to take his photograph...if he didn't mind.
With the burden of my years of commercial experience I find it nearly impossible to take only one or two frames and then to walk away. When I got back home I looked through my images for the day and saw that I'd snapped away for nine or ten frames. And, as I expected, the frames followed a familiar pattern. Good energy but a guardedness on the first few frames. Then the subject feels like he should deliver a different pose or expression and we do that for a few frames. Finally, the subject starts to feel either bored or comfortable and drops his guard enough so that, if you are quick, you can capture something that feels authentic. That has the right energy. In nearly every encounter you know when you've hit the peak of expression and you sense, if you are awake to it, that the subject has had enough attention. Because people aren't used to being stared at by a Cyclops camera. And most people are used to a snapshot being one frame.
The image was taken on a camera with a 3:2 aspect ratio but the tight, square crop seemed to mirror what I was thinking when I made the portrait. I think it's successful. You may not. And that's okay. As long as you have a reason other than the idea that it's wrong to crop out the top of the subject's head.
12 comments:
Great write-up Kirk and love the portraits. That's one of the things I love about your writing, the signal to noise ratio is REALLY good.
Eric
guy on saturday saw my camera and sort of looked at me as if to say "want to take a picture of me?" so I asked if he wanted a photo, he wanted some with his phone and my camera, mine were a little dark on the camera screen but seem fine on my pc, he seemed quite well practiced, he did a kind of catalogue man pose, staring off into the middle distance, he was nice, very pleased to have his photo taken :)
I agree with Eric Rose's comment.
Like it. You should do these closer street portraits more often.
I like to take street portraits, too. This article really resonated with me and I learned some things about how to connect with people and parlay that connection into a successful portrait experience. For me, that was a master class lesson. I'm saving it in my collection of photography articles for future reference. This is why we need you, Kirk. Many thanks.
It may take you out of your comfort zone, but it's a good habit to get into. Although it seems harder in the changing times we live in. You'll get better results.
really interesting. I noticed that talking to strangers might be one of the regular keys to happiness, according to this University of Bristol experiment https://archive.is/ofZ5o
I think leaving out the top of his head (and giving a little extra space under his chin) is a large part of what makes this portrait. It gives space and draws one's eye to his eyes.
Brilliant.
Oh, I forgot to ask - just out of curiosity, what crop camera were you using that takes a Sony lens? I thought that you'd gone pretty much just Leica these days.
Hi Tom, First, thanks for the nice critique!
The camera was a Sony SLT-77. An APS-C camera from around 2008-2010. Just preceding their launch of the A7 series fully mirrorless cameras.
Post a Comment
We Moderate Comments, Yours might not appear right after you hit return. Be patient; I'm usually pretty quick on getting comments up there. Try not to hit return again and again.... If you disagree with something I've written please do so civilly. Be nice or see your comments fly into the void. Anonymous posters are not given special privileges or dispensation. If technology alone requires you to be anonymous your comments will likely pass through moderation if you "sign" them. A new note: Don't tell me how to write or how to blog! I can't make you comment but I don't want to wade through spam!
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.