Saturday, January 10, 2026

Afradet. Early LED experiment. It seemed to have worked.

 


I'm having a renewed love affair with LED lights since I recently purchased two of the Nanlite FS-300-C RGB LED lighting units. I feel like we've finally hit parity (or close enough) with electronic flash units when it comes to color accuracy and overall usability. 300 Watts of LED output is more than enough to work with most studio portrait needs and having that much power also allows for bouncing clean light off high ceilings when working in remote locations. 

(Added just for fun...)

Many of the previous LED lighting units I've owned were designed with power supply and control apparatus contained in a separate enclosure and the light head separated from that box by a cable. There were nearly proprietary connectors on the cables and forgetting any one cable on a location shoot would have spelled disaster.  The current lights I'm using were designed almost light flash monolights in that the power supply, control interface and the light are all contained in one body. It's conveniently mounted to standard light stands and this makes daily use quick and easy. Fast set up and fast tear down.

I'm currently playing around with two of these lights to make portraits. I'm setting the main light up behind 4x4 foot panel with two layers of one stop silk on the panel frame for a nice, soft and controllable light source. The second one is being used with a grid spot on the reflector for illuminating backgrounds. It's nice. It's also the way I always liked to work with flash ---- so it's familiar. 

Big, soft LED sources are great for still like work because they fall so perfectly into the "What you see is what you get!" category. And that makes composing and lighting so much easier. 

It's Saturday now and our club pool is still closed for maintenance and upgrades. I've been swimming this week at the Deep Eddy Pool; an Austin City public pool which is open year round, uses no chlorine and is filled and drained nearly every other day with water from deep wells. The water temperature stays within a narrow range. Right around 70°. That's about ten or eleven degrees colder than our usual workout pool and you can really tell the difference when you get in. It's shocking!!!

The cold always pushes me to go faster to stay warm but it can be a negative as the cold temperature means tighter muscles and more effort. It's also harder to get warmed up and swim as relaxed as I usually try to do. I often come home with sore muscles; especially triceps. I have to do more stretching after each swim to try to maintain flexibility. I can't wait until my main pool is back up and running. 

Rumor has it that the sacred container of perfect water will be up and running on Tuesday. I hope it pans out this way because the weather report predicts that winter is finally arriving here. Swimming outside  when the temps drop into the thirties and forties is just fine if the water is warm enough but a cold pool, cold temperatures and a cold wind are much less comfortable... I guess it's all part of the discipline. 

Hope you are happy and well. Comments always (mostly...) welcome. 

Coming up shortly: A preview essay about Will van Overbeek's "Wet Dog Show." The opening is coming up on the 24th. 30 wonderful and funny, big photos. And wet dogs!!! What's not to like?


Embracing our irrelevance. One person's take on the "demise" of popular photography...

 A photo friend sent me a link to this Australian bloke's video. I found it true, somewhat funny and kind of resolved at the end. 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K8uydkwD344

Fun Kirk images below added after the fact. Just for fun. Irrelevance? What we are now practicing everyday...





Thursday, January 08, 2026

Some images I made with the Leica DLUX 8 with the focus switch set for macro. You can still focus on things further away but you can get closer with the switch enabled.

 











It's hot and sunny here. Might hit 80° again today. Tossing a wrench in my plans to wear a new jacket. Making a mockery out of a box, in my closet, filled with various hats and caps, made from everything from fleece to wool, cotton to synthetic thermals. Scarves? Chuckle, chuckle. Can you remind me what those are for? Maybe next week I'll get to wear my UT sweatshirt around town. Probably more like t-shirt weather... At least it's less daunting than swimming outdoors with a 40 mph wind and 18° on the thermometer... 

The days are getting longer. Thank goodness. More time to shoot.



Wednesday, January 07, 2026

One of my favorite posts ever. From all the way back in 2010. A "reprint".

 

Why you shouldn't run your life like a business....

image of an actor portraying the famous Louisiana governor, Huey Long, for Zach Scott Theater.  Hasselblad 201f, 150mm 2.8 Zeiss lens.  


When I was young I never thought about money.  There was always enough.  Never too much.  Only rarely did I long for something I couldn't afford.  I was happy chasing beautiful women, eating euphorically great Tex Mex food and sleeping on a futon on the floor of my small downtown studio.  (Now we would call this a "live/work space").  I stayed in school at UT for nearly ten years if you count the teaching jobs.  And I certainly wasn't thinking about the money as I abandoned electrical engineering for English literature and then for photography. 

What I was thinking about is how to make photographs.  And why to make photographs.  And how to enjoy my working life.  Even though it seems harder to make money in photography now I know that there is a flip side to that perception.  It may be that now I've had the inertia of hundreds or thousands of people in my life who either tell me directly or thru their actions that making money is vitally important, being a "smart" businessman is vitally important,  that dying rich is mission critical.  And for a moment I started giving in to the inertia.  I started to believe the upscale, white bread vision of the American Dream.

Thankfully, this blog, which generates no real money and sucks down hours of time delivered me a left handed gift in the guise of a reader who suggested that I run my business in a way that makes sense.  He read about the death of my favorite umbrella on yesterday's blog offering and took me to task for not taking an assistant with me everywhere.  No matter what the logistics of a shoot the entourage trumps my comfort and my "working methodology".  He went on to say that my belief in focusing on my portrait subject with all my conscious intention, and not being distracted by other people, and not letting my portrait subject be distracted by other people was "BS".  And I don't think he meant, "Bachelor of Science".  This is not meant to be a spiteful rejoinder to his well intentioned (I assume) post but as a paean to Hunter S. Thompson and the spirit of having fun in your own special way.  All fictional, of course.

So, according to the great, homogenized business plan of universal commercial photography a smart businessman would have an assistant at his side in every shoot.  Ready to lunge for falling light stands and take one for the team, when necessary.  To sweeten the pot I get the unalloyed joy of spending all my waking hours in the presence of said assistant.  They are to provide me chauffeur services when I get all noddy-offy.  And I'm sure I can look forward to hours of lively conversation about all sorts of things that twenty somethings are interested in during the endless dinners, lunches, breakfasts and coffee breaks we'll be taking together.  Sounds worse than dating and I've succeeded in avoiding that particular pleasure for over thirty years now.

But, indeed, this would be a smart business thing to do.  I can picture it now:  Yukio, all dressed in assistant black with tattoos , and I, are heading down farm to market road 123 in north Texas.  Yukio is at the wheel and is a picture of intensity.  The lines on the road whip by like the bullets in the Matrix.  Scenery? Screw the scenery! We're on fire.  I've got an iPhone in one hand and a laptop in the other.  I'm manically calling my clients every five minutes to check in.  When I'm not calling the clients I'm calling suppliers trying to bargain down their pricing to maximize our profit.  I'm on one call when the other phone rings.  It's my broker.  They need an answer right away.  Back to the first phone with my broker on hold and I'm speed dialing my attorney to make sure that the insider information I got from yesterday's client won't land me in hot water if I short a butt load of that client's stock before the closing bell.  We resolve that and I look over at Yukio.  She's in the zone.  We're making good time.  She's holding the Element right at 105 (mph).   At this rate we'll get paid for a travel day and a shooting day all in the same day.  To maximize profit.  Yukio hasn't slept in days.  I keep putting amphetamines in her coffee.  Makes her much more efficient.  And a much faster driver.

West coast should be awake now so I start dialing anyone who will listen to me.  The prices went up on a bunch of stuff I bought last week, some Canon stuff, and I haven't had it shipped to me yet but I'll probably sell it at a profit to some guy in LA who needs it bad and can't find the cool stuff in stock.  Is it wrong for me to screw the whole market and corner needed gear, selling it a week later at a much higher price?  Naw.  Gotta keep moving relentlessly forward.  Like a shark.  Or with Yukio, like a whole school of sharks.

We stop at a small gas station in Armpit, Texas to scrounge up Red Bulls and No Doze.  I notice Yukio shaking violently and think this can't be a good thing.  When she heads to the restroom I start dialing replacement assistants just in case.  Yukio comes back looking refreshed and starts crying when I offer to drive for a while.  She's out cold on an equipment case in the back, seconds later.

I stop a bit later with the intention of running into a Starbuck's for a quad shot latte and I wonder if I should wake Yukio.  Who am I kidding? It's been so long since I've carried my own coffee to the car I wouldn't know how to do it.  And I'm not very good with the lids on top either. 

We stop in Texarkana where I've agreed to do an evening shoot in return for a slightly higher fee.  Yukio and I sleep walk through this one.  You gotta hand it to the assisting school the Yuk-ster attended.  She can dive for a falling light stand like no one I've seen.  I have her set up ten or so lights to impress the client and, at the end of the evening when I get bored I randomly knock them over to see just how many Yukio can handle under pressure.  Haven't lost one in months.

My turn to nap in the car while we drive on toward Dallas.  I wake up to find that we're somewhere west of El Paso and the engine is on fire.  I leave it all to Yukio while I sun bathe next to the interstate to build up my reserves of vitamin D.  Don't know how she pulled it off but apparently we've (she's) loaded all of the gear into a minivan that she commandeered at gunpoint and we're racing off to catch up with Dallas. We toss a couple cans of Red Bull to the elderly couple whose minivan we're borrowing so they don't get too dehydrated while walking across the desert. 

I'm bored with the music I brought along on my cheap MP3 player (can't buy an iPod.  Not a sound biz decision) and I pout for a few minutes till I remember that I have an assistant in tow and I force her at gunpoint to start singing Beatles tunes for me while I cold call on the phone and look over some spread sheets I got from my business coach.  Real estate, baby.  All counterintuitive.

We make it to our location with minutes to spare and I watch with awe as Yukio loads the equipment cart high.  It would be easier on her if I could make up my mind but, because of the perilous nature of my business I require her to bring all four brands of lights I worship,  and three brands of cameras into each location so I can decide based on the spiritual vibes of the space.  What's six hundred pounds between friends.  No, scratch that.  Between employer and freelance contractor, uncovered by insurance or tax withholding.  Magnanimous photographer that I am I do hold the elevator door so that it doesn't crunch that bag of my favorite lenses.

It's a portrait shot and we've done thousands of these before but for the life of me I just can't make up my mind.  Six lights?  Ten lights?  Double backgrounds?  I leave vague instructions for my assistant and wander off to find the client and some coffee.  My client is a bit concerned because she's sure we discussed the exact lighting set up on the phone and in e-mails.  She even produces drawings of the intended shots which she claims to have sent me weeks ago.  I do what any self-respecting photographer might do.  I blame Yukio.  I dress her down right there in front of client and camera.  She doesn't mind, she knows that every once in a while everyone has to take one for the team.  As long as it's not me.  I gobble down a few Xanax to offset the coffee jitters.  Thank God for chemistry.

I'm on the phone with another client and Yukio is skimming Craig's List looking for a new job when the CEO of the company we're working for comes in.  He's ready to be photographed and he's like a beige bowling ball with a shiny, sweaty complexion.  No problem, Yukio will take care of that in a heartbeat. She's the Swiss Army Knife (TM) of assistants.  Ready to powder a "glistener" in a heartbeat.
Thank God I've got an assistant in the room because I haven't got a clue which direction we're shooting in.  All looks and feels the same to me.  She gets me lined up and ready.  Focuses the camera and sets the exposure.  We shoot.  She stands behind me making faces and twitches, staring at the client to get his attention.  We have a strict rule:  the client should never directly engage the camera.  It's the assistant's duty to distract them into a more natural pose and expression.

Just as we're about to pull off the perfect shot the power in the building goes off.  Not a problem,  the crafty and enterprising Y pulls a contraption that looks like an exercise bike out of one of our cases and sets it up.  On either side of the back wheel is a heavy grey casing that looks a lot like a car generator.  She plugs the power packs into the contraption then gets on the bicycle seat and starts peddling like Lance Armstrong running from the French.  She's sweating buckets but the packs are back up and recycling.  We finish shooting the CEO and as the last frame gets saved to the CF card my assistant falls to the floor, insensate.  She's inarticulate for a while.  Then we dowse her with a bucket of cold water and she comes to.  Just in time,  there's packing to be done and a bucket's worth of cold water to sponge up off the client's floor.

Looking back, we've billed three shooting days and two travel days in the space of two 24 hour days.  I wonder if I could be more efficient with a second assistant.  Seems counter productive but both Madonna and Oprah have larger entourages and they are far wealthier than me.  Seems like it's worth a shot.  Can I keep up this pace?  Will Pfizer and Sandofi keep making interesting chemicals?  Will the coffee run out?

Then,  I wake up with a start from this bad dream and realize that the assistant thing is an acquired taste.  And every photographer has a different comfort zone within which to work.  I don't mind coming early to set up.  I don't mind having dinner alone.  I'm okay handling most stuff. I don't have an iPhone.  I cherish my time writing and thinking.  I think I'll leave things just the way they are.  In the days of digital assistants are for big productions, or complex stuff. 

Now,  when  it comes to post processing, Yukio and I handle it so well we've already post processed the stuff we're going to shoot next year.

To bring the whole blog back around to the beginning I have an observation to make:  When I actively think about doing things to make money stuff rarely  works out.  I do my due diligence. I send contracts. I follow up.  But when I focus on money as the reward everything always goes south.  When I enjoy the process or the challenge, when I love what I do, the money rolls in.  The more I desire the less I get.  The less I desire the more I get.  So, by that logic, if I desire nothing I'll get it all.  Whatever.  I just like the feel of a camera in my hand and a project in front of me.

Business note:  The IRS is busy redefining contract workers, employer obligations and YOUR tax obligations to contractors whom they may (almost certainly) classify as regular workers.  They (assistants) do work under your direction, with your tools and all the stuff that serves as a litmus test for who is an employee. If you think that freelance assistants are vital to your business you owe it to yourself to check with an attorney who is very familiar with payroll issues so that you don't wind up getting a big, unintended consequence in the pursuit of photographic business practices from the film days.......

Having fun with the Carl Zeiss 85mm f4 lens. Small and light. Sharp and optically near perfect. No other news that's relevant.

 


I got this little lens a couple of days ago and I just really had the opportunity to do more than point it outside the studio and take enough shots to make sure it worked. Most of my photographs here are little more than test pictures to see about things like vignetting, overall sharpness --- even into the corners, and the color rendering when used with one of my favorite cameras. From my time with the lens this morning, shooting mostly at its sharpest aperture of f5.6, I have to say that it's capable of high contrast and high acutance, create nano acuity and at the same time it's about as discreet as a short telephoto could be. Since the max aperture is f4 you can't get the same kind of gooey background you could from a lens with an f1.4 aperture but then, not everything needs to be cotton ball soft in the background of every photograph. 

I used a Leica SL to make my tests. The first version of their professional mirrorless line. I think I like the sensor in that model more than the later Sony sensors. I certainly like that I'm able to shoot with native ISO of 50 when the light is strong and the aperture I want to use is around 5.6 or larger. And I have to say that I find the colors to be very clean and precise. It's interesting, always, to see how much of a difference various sensors make in the imaging systems of modern cameras. 

On another note, my second Nanlite FS400-C light arrived at the local Fedex office today and I was able to pick it up right before lunch. I plugged it in and ran it through its paces before heading off to warm up some left over Ropa Vieja that B. left in the fridge for me. Along with slices of avocado. Everything works well and now I can flatten the shipping boxes and recycle them. I am vigorously opposed to keeping random equipment shipping boxes around. They take up too much space. 

Finally, I have to report that our usual swimming pool is closed for maintenance all this week and until Tuesday of next week. At least that's the promised re-opening day. Construction projects of any kind are fraught with various unexpected delays. In the interim I'm swimming at the spring fed pool called, Deep Eddy, where the temperature is at least 10 degrees colder. It's bracing and requires a lot more discipline to get over to and get swimming early in the morning. Brrrrrr. 

All the images here are from the Carl Zeiss ZM 85mm f4 lens that was designed and produced for the M mount. Zeiss even made their own M film camera in the early part of this century. I believe that camera is now discontinued but most of the lenses Zeiss made for the system are still available, still great, and very usable on any Leica M mount camera. They focus quite well and bring up the appropriate frame lines. Well, with the exception of the 85, which brings up the 90mm frame lines because...there are no 85mm frame lined in the current M camera finders...

Hope your pools are open and well tended. Hope your lens inventory is happy and snappy. 

One thing to remember when reading "opinions" on the web couched as fact: Data, and cherry picked anecdotal stories, are NOT the same thing. I guess there are so many new ways to look at "facts." 





















Monday, January 05, 2026

Newly arrived at the office. A new lens to play around with.




In the past few years I've read a bit about an elusive lens that Carl Zeiss made specifically for M mount cameras. It's the ZM 85mm, f4, Tele Tessar. It's a tiny short telephoto lens with a small maximum aperture but it makes up for its slow speed by being optically very, very good. Even when used wide open. I didn't actually buy this one. No cash traded hands. One of my friends bought the lens on a lark and was interested in trading me for a wider angle lens of which I had several copies. Always eager to play with new lenses so we quickly consummated the deal over coffee at our favorite downtown Whole Foods flagship store. 

Here's what Google's AI has to say about the lens: 

The 
 is a highly regarded, though niche, short telephoto lens for M-mount rangefinder cameras
. It is often praised for its extreme sharpness and portability, making it a favorite for travel and landscape photography. 
Optical Performance
  • Sharpness: It is considered one of the sharpest telephoto lenses for M-mount, delivering world-class results from f/5.6 onwards.
  • Distortion: The lens exhibits virtually zero geometric distortion, making it excellent for architectural and landscape work.
  • Micro-Contrast: Reviewers frequently highlight the "Zeiss look," characterized by high micro-contrast, vibrant colors, and 3D separation.
  • Flare & CA: It features a T* anti-reflective coating that effectively resists flare and ghosting. Chromatic aberration is minimal and generally only visible in extreme high-contrast situations. 
Build and Handling
  • Compact Design: Its modest f/4 aperture allows for a remarkably small and lightweight profile (approx. 310g), making it easy to carry.
  • Mechanical Quality: The all-metal barrel and manual focus ring are noted for their smooth, precise, and durable feel.
  • Focusing: It has a minimum focus distance of 0.9m (approx. 3 feet). 
Key Considerations
  • Frameline Inaccuracy: Leica M rangefinders lack 85mm framelines; users must use the 90mm lines, which can lead to imprecise framing as the 85mm view is wider.
  • Slow Aperture: The f/4 maximum aperture is "slow" for an 85mm lens, limiting its use in low light and reducing its ability to create heavily blurred backgrounds (bokeh) compared to f/1.4 or f/2 alternatives.
  • Status: The lens is discontinued, meaning it is primarily available through the used market. 
Verdict
Pros Cons
Exceptional sharpness and zero distortionModest f/4 maximum aperture
Extremely compact and travel-friendlyNo dedicated 85mm framelines on Leica M
Robust all-metal build qualityLens hood often sold separately or is bulky
Strong flare resistance and micro-contrastManual focus only (typical for rangefinders)
All the human reviews I have read, by people who actually possessed and used the lens, say pretty much the same things. I just got the lens this afternoon but I look forward to testing it throughout the week. 
It's unseasonably hot here and tomorrow is predicted to be even warmer. We're looking at an early January high temperature of about 85°. Definitely not weather in which to show off those new Christmas sweaters we all got. And it's sunny so the goulashes aren't getting a workout either....

I have high expectations for this lens. I've owned the 50mm, 35mm and 28mm ZM lenses and have found each of them to be sharp and very nicely contrasty. I'm expecting the same for this one!

Hope you are staying cool/or warm in this wild weather. A zany start to 2026 for us here in Texas.

Got the lens hood as part of the deal...


 

Reprint from 2016: Daily Practice is a good thing for swimming, playing the piano and making art with a camera. Familiarity engenders comfortable knowledge.

 

Daily Practice is a good thing for swimming, playing the piano and making art with a camera. Familiarity engenders comfortable knowledge.

Post Swim Self-Portrait.

When I look around at the contemporary landscape I am often surprised that no one carries their camera with them anymore, unless they are on some sort of photographic mission. I guess the rationalization is that everyone is carrying their phone and so are equipped for those times when an image presents itself. Then, of course, if the image doesn't turn out well they have a built-in excuse to trot out --- "it was just shot with my phone." 

When I was a student at UT Austin I was fortunate to make the acquaintance of a photographer named, Garry Winogrand. He was a visiting lecturer in the College of Fine Arts, and also a regular habitué of the hi-fi shop where I worked part time. One semester I took his class. It was a revelation to me; that photography could be nearly totally immersive.

It was back in the 1970s and everyone was into photography around campus. Olympus, Nikon and Leica cameras dangled casually over shoulders, and over the corners of chairs at coffee shops and bars. It was common practice to people watch on the patio at Les Amis Cafe with one's camera on the table; exposure set, ready to capture some wry and interesting moment that might unfold in front of us.

We wore our cameras to class and we took them along with us everywhere but into the pool. 

Garry Winogrand was a role model for some of us. He didn't take his camera with him most places. He took one or two or three Leica M cameras with him everywhere and he shot all the time. He could load those cameras and set exposure and focus without ever having to look at the camera. As he walked down the main drag across from campus he was continually adjusting focus and exposure, and constantly shooting whatever caught his eyes.

Garry made a lot of images but he never had to make the excuse that this picture or that picture turned out poorly because it was taken with his phone. 

Thinking about this now I believe that Garry carried his camera at the ready in order to train his mind to be always ready. To train his mind not to be self-conscious about the idea of, or the act of, taking photographs of strangers in the street, or strangers in the hallways. 

As photographers we seem to have become sensitized to society's anxiety about the use of images. We fear that our behavior will be interpreted as intrusive and sinister, or that it may cause discomfort to the people we observe and photograph. We self-restrict because we are part of our culture and feel the unspoken, but quite real, constraints and pressures that events of the last two decades have cumulatively hobbled us with.

And, like most habits, the surrender to the pressure of the group is ever self-reinforcing. The less we carry our cameras around the more uncomfortable we come to feel when we do carry them around. Some of us become more furtive in our efforts and some quit the field altogether to become "landscape" photographers. Only shooting images without people in them in order to remove one more source of friction from the process of making photographs as personal art. (Even though some artists would say that all good creativity involves some amount of friction in order to be manifested into existence...).

In essence this surrender seems to signal that we have become cognizant that we are doing something almost tabu. Something almost perilously outside the mainstream. But in reality our acquiescence to perceived social norms may be, at least partially, our response to merely the general disappearance of cameras in our everyday lives. We don't see as many cameras. We feel segmented from the group by nature of our extra "plumage." The camera over the shoulder comes to signify our implied differentiation from our social groups. We become outsiders. And the cycle of reinforced behavior continues, and continues to constrict. 

The level of highest comfort will be achieved when we achieve homogenous parity. But.... If we fancy ourselves to be artists then the discomfort of exclusion is part and parcel of the artist's experience. We need to be a bit outside to see past the objective self-image of the group in order to make subjective images as commentary on culture. Just as Robert Frank (a Swiss citizen) was able to step outside the collective emotional reticence of 1950's U.S. culture to shoot "forbidden" images of our tender psycho-social underbelly we, as artists, also need to stand outside the group's self-censorship if we are to express our real and authentic voice. Otherwise the cameras exist just as toys for tactile enjoyment. 

What photographers like Garry Winogrand showed me was that we don't wear our cameras through our daily lives to make a fashion statement or to show off our buying prowess but to become personally comfortable with the "idea" of being able to respond to visual and social stimuli wherever and whenever our muses favor us. By keeping the camera close by we are making clear (to ourselves and the public body) our intentions to photograph. And we do so by, if necessary, walking against the current of our contemporary culture instead of being swept downstream by our own emotional trepidation of seeming to exist on the periphery of "the group." We trade a certain amount of social safety net for a larger amount of autonomous thought and action. 

But the constant carrying and use of our cameras isn't really about thumbing our noses at cultural convention, it's about building a fluidity of both practice (eye, hand, brain and subconscious coordination) as well as re-building our own understanding that one of the rights and privileges of living in a free society includes both our free expression, and the covenant to protect our individual rights as a group. 

I carry a camera with me everywhere and, like the "worry beads" of my Turkish friends, I have the camera in my hands when I am in between meetings, on buses, in waiting rooms. My fingers come to know where the controls of the camera are and how to hold the camera to reduce its movement. The familiarity takes hesitation out of practice.

As a swimmer I know all too well that a week out of the pool means I am "out of practice" and "out of shape." In photography the "out of practice" translates to a weakening of intention to be photographically present now. "Out of shape" translates as a loss of muscle memory and habit. 

Like all rights, the more we ignore our privileges, and underestimate their importance and relevance, the quicker they go away. Our hoped for immersion into our art and our craft suffers when we allow the momentum of popular opinion to sway us into abandoning our public pursuit of our arts. 

But we need to make sure we aren't (in)actively complicit. Making good images in public has always been hard but people have always succeeded in making valuable artifacts of their cultures anyway. The first step is to make sure that our intention to create follows through to bolster our courage to publicly embrace the process. To make other people comfortable with the idea of people carrying their cameras we must first make ourselves comfortable with that idea. 

First step? Well, it's lunch time here and Belinda and I are heading out to our favorite burger joint for a couple of burgers and a shared bag of fries. You can count on me having a camera over my shoulder. Who knows what art may transpire if someone drops the ketchup in a particularly interesting way....