8.10.2023

Combining photographic technique testing and exercise. Working on the black and whites. AKA: Monochrome.

 



I spent some time yesterday morning walking along some old, familiar trails through downtown Austin. I had one of my favorite "walk" cameras with me; a Leica Q2. I'm not one of those classic, old school photographers who love to overthink shots and I don't believe very many people who make a big deal about pre-visualizing a photograph and then endlessly tweaking before the actual taking of the photograph are really taking better photographs. Reminds me too much of amateurs standing at the scenic overlook of the Grand Canyon in front of a group of ten or fifteen bored family or tour members waiting, waiting and waiting for the photographer to get the focus.....just right. Mind numbing. Temporal wasteland. Overthinking things that should be easy or automatic. 

Want to get everything exactly just right before clicking the shutter? Then build a set and hire some models.

With all this in mind, if I am multi-tasking at photography and walking, and walking is the "primary" activity, then the photographic part should be mostly auto-pilot. So I set the camera to raw (bigger mishap buffer), set it to Auto-ISO, dial in a minus one stop exposure compensation (easier to recover shadows than non-existent highlights) and then shoot everything using aperture priority with an f-stop that matches my usual vision for a particular focal length. For the 28mm lens on a full frame camera I find that either f8 or f5.6 handles most outdoor scenes well. With the camera set this way it's so easy to respond quickly and without a bunch of ineffective fussiness. Less second guessing.

This is also the way I'm approaching black and white casual photography with handheld cameras now. I've given up even having to see the image in the EVF as a black and white. I just try to capture the best image I can in a color DNG file and then use the ever-improving Lightroom presets and controls to make what I consider to be good black and white conversions. With this new (to me) approach I thought I should include some "before and after" samples. Along with an image of the current (non-Tilley) hat of the month. Is there a "hat of the month" club? Should there be? 

So, each set of images started out life as a quick shot on a handheld Q2. No fussing, no recomposing and no second guessing as to whether the scene would be better or worse if I waited. It's a process that honors the belief in the power of first impressions. See the scene in a flash of recognition, bring the camera to your eye, quickly compose (and by that I mean to figure out where the edges of the fixed frame should be positioned) and then click the shutter. And, the shutter having been clicked is my cue to move on.

Most of these images I actually prefer in color. But I wanted to work on my conversion technique to black and white. Especially after having been challenged by adherents of the Monochrome Camera Cults. I have a Leica M10 monochrom coming on loan shortly so I can really, really see how much of the difference is apparent and how much is placebo. Placebo still being a very powerful thing...

Anyway. It's a peek at how I think. Move fast, shoot stuff, go home and work on it.








No B&W on this one. just a palette cleanser. 





20 comments:

Dick Barbour said...

"Move fast, shoot stuff, go home and work on it." My way also, particularly in this heat!

I like your B&W conversions, but the one of the canoes really looks nice in color, with all the subtle hues of blue and grey, framed by the green at the top.

Dick

Steve R said...

"just a palette cleanser"

Well played, sir.

Kirk, Photographer/Writer said...

Thanks Steve!

Anonymous said...

I too prefer the canoes in color. It's a beautiful shot. The B&W might work really well as frame "wall art" in an upscale hotel room near a vacation area with nice water. Well shot.

R.A.

Anonymous said...

I like that one of the canoes, I don't think my screen is set up very well for blacks

just noticed a new voiglander for X mount, 35mm f0.9, I blame the TTartisans of this world for starting the aperture blades arms race, I think the mainstream guys jumped on it after that, this one has 12 blades

also a new 28mm 2.8 looks like it might be in M mount, not sure, it's VM mount but there's a type 1 and 2

adam said...

I expect some japanese youtubers will have those very soon

Andy said...

The B&W might work really well as frame "wall art" in an upscale hotel room near a vacation area with nice water.

A bit harsh. I prefer the B&W. One man's peach etc....

DIS Ottawa said...

It's a well known and incontrovertible fact that all photographs made while wearing a Tilley hat are superior to those made while not wearing a Tilley hat. Well, outdoors pictures anyway. Why, wearing a Tilley is almost a requirement when shooting landscape. Again, fact. Really.

jim said...

I just don't "get" this issue?? of needing to view the scene you are photographing in monochrome if you are planning to make the final image monochrome? But then i spent my first 50 or so years of photography with film. Didn't need to look through a filter to know what effect it would have on the film either, except for a polarizer- and you needed to look through it to use it correctly.

Kirk, Photographer/Writer said...

Hi Jim,
I only have some 40+ years of experience as a professional photographer and I, of course, remember shooting with nothing but glass viewfinders for a long, long time. While it's nice to see the "finished" image in the viewfinder I think a careful (er) read would show that I'm saying that I am abandoning that working methodology and just shooting all the images as RAW and developing them as either black and white or color as desired....after the shoot.

I agree that an experienced photographer has a really good idea of what an image will look like as black and white whether they see that in the find or not.

Kirk, Photographer/Writer said...

DIS Ottawa, I see why so many photographers from a certain era complain bitterly about the cost of camera gear. They spent all of their money on the very, very pricey Tilley Hat leaving nothing left over for photographs....

I can't afford to be both a slave to 1970's fashion and also an unrestrained camera buyer so I've had to make hard choices in life...

karmagroovy said...

The bridge shot is soooooo much better in B&W than color... it's not even close.

I'm hoping that this will prompt a full on flame war. ;-) And go ahead and add me to the color canoe contingent.

Roland Tanglao said...

i prefer the black and white canoes but i'm kr*zy that way of course :-)

JC said...

I like the canoes in color, because the color is very suppressed and that's something I've always had a taste for. I think very light color tones in portraits are also attractive (as is good B&W of course.)

I'm traveling, went to a Barnes and Noble to get reading matter, and picked up a very expensive magazine ($29.99) called "Master Black & White Photography" with a subhead that says, "178 pages of expert advice." Amazing. 178 pages away from mastery. Who would have thunk?

On the first three holes of the back nine today, I went par-birdie-par, which I attribute mostly to my wearing one of my three Tilley hats, this one in white.

Anonymous said...

What is a Tilley hat? Why do you dislike them? The internet has always the home of over think. N
c.d.embrey
There is a difference between lighting and illumination.

bishopsmead said...

I love the canoes, but I would go with the monochrome version. How about isolating the canoes in colour and rendering the background as monochrome? I seem to recollect these canoes appearing before (or was it different canoes?); it would be interesting to see how today's canoes compare with the ones from previous years! The other shots are good too, especially the Tilley hat, in colour of course!

Richard said...

Kirk wrote “ I agree that an experienced photographer has a really good idea of what an image will look like as black and white whether they see that in the find or not.”. Ah, but if it’s black and white in the finder do you have a good idea d what it will look like in colour? I’ll get me coat …

Kirk, Photographer/Writer said...

Richard, Interesting question. I'll meditate on that one.

What's a "coat"? We don't have those in Austin anymore... Just the thought of owning one is too hot...

jim said...

Kirk,
I get what you are saying. I follow the same methodology, except i shoot JPEG only. A discussion on that choice would have to be in person :) If i was shooting for a paying client it would be in RAW. I generally intend for most images to be B&W, but the flexibility to examine a color shot in processing can lead to the bonus to an interesting color image.
To clarify my earlier comment, it seems to me that lots of photographers seem to "need" to view the image "finished" to have any idea if they "have" what they imagined. Visualizing the completed image always used to require an idea of what would needed to be done in post processing. And post was more limited than it is today. Yet another in person discussion:)
I type with one finger!

JoeB said...

KT,
Hat of the month club- great. How about camera strap of the month club, camera bag of the month, f.95 lens of the month club. And of course the old favorite the f64 photo of the month,
m4/3 folks need not join.