9.15.2023

Two hours in with the Leica M240. How do I like it so far? What do the files look like? How are the batteries? Would I do it again?


The Leica M240 arrived from the Leica Store Miami yesterday. I started charging the two batteries that came with it. The packing of the product was impeccable. The camera came in the original box along with all the original cables, manuals, and other materials. In addition to an extra battery there was also an accessory thumb grip. Nice. The guys at Leica Store Miami do a great job curating the used equipment the sell. Their standards for accepting used gear are high and that means when you buy used gear from them you get a well inspected, well considered product. This is the fifth Leica camera body I've bought from them in two years and I'm still impressed by their service. 

(Disclaimer: I don't work for them, am not sponsored in any way by them, don't get any free gear and don't even get a mild discount. I asked for one. It was not forthcoming..... just so you know). 

What the heck is a Leica M240? It's Leica's first big attempt to bring the M series rangefinder cameras into a modern field of cameras. It's a well built rangefinder camera in the tradition of the Leica M3 and subsequent film models. It's full frame as was its predecessor, the Leica M9 but where the M9 had a Kodak CCD imaging sensor the M240 was fitted with a full frame, 24 megapixel, CMOS sensor that is NOT a Sony product. The sensor was designed and produced by two European companies. Details from Wikipedia here: 

The M uses a CMOS 24-megapixel (6,000 × 4,000 pixels) image sensor designed for Leica by the Belgian company CMOSIS,[5] and made by STMicroelectronics in Grenoble.[5] The pixels are on a 6 x 6 µm² grid.

The move to a CMOS sensor allowed for the inclusion of video capabilities but more importantly it made the M240 the first Leica full frame rangefinder camera to feature live view. Which opens up other features such as more advanced metering and the ability to use punch in magnification for fine focusing.

Except for special editions the M240 was the last M series rangefinder camera in the family to use brass for the top and bottom plates. Cameras after the M240 used aluminum alloy, which is lighter, but doesn't give you that nice warm brassiness when the finishes wear off on the edges of the camera. The brass cameras feel denser and more stout. 

To keep up with the new features unleashed by the CMOS sensor Leica gave the M240 a much bigger battery that the ones found in previous or newer models. If you choose not to use the live view and video features this bigger battery translates into a much improved battery life. When I was out shooting this morning I didn't take along a spare battery --- on purpose. I wanted to see what one of the two batteries I'd been sent would do in a long walk scenario. I switched off live view and even shut off the automatic review on the LCD screen. I left the camera on from 10 a.m. to 1 p.m. It was set to go to sleep after 30 seconds of no action on my part but the joyous and exhilarating thing I found out first is that it wakes up in less than a second. A light touch on the shutter button and you're ready to go.

The second thing I found out was that in spite of shooting nearly 200 exposures in the raw/DNG format and chimping nearly every shot the battery still had 85% of its charge left in the tank. Nice. Really nice. 

When I was getting ready to leave the house this morning I knew I wanted to use the Voightlander 50mm f2.0 APO lens on the camera this morning. I had several reasons for this. First, I wanted to shoot a bunch of stuff close and wide open so I could make sure the rangefinder calibration with right on the money. It was. Second, I spent a couple of years back in the 1980s shooting with nothing but a 50mm lens on the Leica M3 rangefinder I had back then. It was a 50mm Summicron. Also an f2.0. A bit of nostalgia for sure, but also a nod toward the fact that I'm now wearing glasses and wanted to see the rangefinder patches clearly, as well as the edges of the 50mm frame lines. Too wide a lens and I'd have to ditch the glasses to take it all in.

The camera and lens together are wonderful. Made for each other it seems. If I knew I'd never accept another commercial job I was rush out and find a couple more pristine M240 cameras, sell everything else, sell everything in the studio and never look back. Getting an M camera back in my hands was like walking back into my Grandmother Tuck's kitchen and smelling cookies baking and peaking into the oven to catch a glimpse of a perfect roast... Like coming home.

I have four lenses to use with the M240. Two are Zeiss (28 Biogon and 35mm f2.0 Planar) and two are Voigtlander lenses. One of the VMs is the ridiculously good 50mm f2.0 APO Lanthar lens and the other is the 40mm f1.4 Nokton "Classic." All four are good, semi-modern lenses and they are a delight to use without the need for adapters which end up adding to their size. 

I thought I'd have a much longer learning curve to get back into the saddle but by the time I arrived back home for lunch, around 1:30, I felt like I knew every square inch of the camera, how to set it up and most importantly --- how to use it. Don't know about anyone else but I find rangefinder focusing quicker and easier than any ANY AF camera I've ever used. It just feels natural. 

So, what do the files look like? Well, I've included a bunch below. A couple have adjacent files which are 100% crops. I think the files are nice and detailed but I didn't expect less. There is more noise at ISO1600 and ISO3200 than on a more modern sensor but not much different than the sensor in the SL cameras. And with the new A.I. noise reduction in Lightroom it's easier to fix the noise than it is to talk about it. 

Would I do it again? Meaning buy an M240 after having played with this one? You've got to be kidding. I'm already on the prowl to add a second nearly similar body - -- the Leica M-P. It's an upgraded version of the M240 with a two GB buffer and twice the speed of the M240. The body is pretty much the same. As is the look of the files. But it's also a bit stealthier --- with no red status logo on the front. I will do it again. Count on it. 

Should you buy one? Naw. You should shun them whenever you see one on the market. And then you should send me a quick note with the name and address of the seller. As quick as you can. 

No animals were harmed in this transaction or test. No bank accounts or investment accounts will collapse as a result of this expenditure. The universe will not implode (any time soon). Just thought I'd share my first time back with an M in a long time. And my first ownership of a digital M camera. It's fun. 

Now, you know, you can click on the images below in your browser if you want to see them enlarged...

B. Having breakfast in the kitchen. Reading. Always reading. 

A 100% crop of the above image one above. 

Post St. Patrick's Day? 

clutter collage. 

It's always fun to walk down the back alleys. Well, maybe not at 2 in the morning...
But around the UT campus the best impromptu "murals" are to be found off the 
streets and in the alleys.


Good dynamic range chops.

The current state of print journalism on the UT campus. 

click in because I think this random photo shows off the 3D characteristics at least of the lens.

While out on the walk I went to the Humanities Research Center (aka: The Harry Ransom Center) to see a new show of very old books. I was the only visitor in the galleries this morning. But it was fascinating to see how well preserved some books from as far back at the 1300s were. 
Most books disappear before they age into permanence. Writers hope for immortality
but damn few see it. The first published book of John Milton's "Paradise Lost" was under glass in a case this morning. Amazing. 


Yes. The Leica M240 does fine at ISO 1600. With an assist from noise reduction in Lightroom.
But you would have had to look into the shadows under the table to really see the noise 
originally in the file. 

A section on the importance of the cover art. In some cases books were produced 
with the content merely being filler for the design and craftsmanship of the covers. 



 The first published volume of Shakespeare's plays....



Exterior. HRC. At UT Austin. Also home of the Gernsheim collection of photography. 
World class collection, indeed. 


the Ellsworth Kelly Chapel on the campus at the Blanton Museum. Exterior. 

From the HRC I headed over to the Blanton Museum of Art to take in two new shows. One is a collection of Mayan art from the Los Angeles museum and the other is a show using articles from the Blanton's permanent collection to create a keen dialog about climate change. Both are worth seeing. 
One upstairs and one downstairs. No freebies today. I had to pay the full "senior" fare of $12. 





this was my favorite modern image in the climate change exhibit.

I ended my visit to the Blanton with a quick visit to the Battle Sculpture Collection. It's a favorite of mine. The entire collection used to be housed on the second floor of the HRC but this small handful of replica sculptures are all that remains visitable by the public. And I'm a sucker for statues. Very fun to photograph and they never move when you don't want them to....


Obviously, a tight crop of the image one above. 



"Alley Art. #1"

"Alley Art. #2"

Trying my timid hand at street photography. Got a rangefinder. Just had to try...


Subjective for sure but... my best shot of the day.




More from and about the M240 to come. 

Please stay tuned. Please consider commenting. 

Please consider doing it authentically instead of advancing
some passive aggressive agent. 

As they say:

have a nice day.






 

14 comments:

prk60091 said...

how does it compare to using the Q2? (Asking for a friend)

Kirk, Photographer/Writer said...

Interesting question. The Q2 at 28 beats the M240 with a 28mm at just about everything. But the M240 is better at 50mm and more fun to shoot there. I think one should have both. Just tell your friend to splash out for one of each. Except now I'm thinking two of the M240s... you know, redundant back up and all that. (excuses, excuses).

Brian Caslis said...

I bought my first M (M11) about 9 months I've been hooked. My other camera (Nikon) can always get the shot but the M11 is so much more fun and each photo feels an accomplishment. When you are looking for second body, the M11 is lighter, has even bigger battery, is thinner (just like a film M), and has even better photos. Just saying...

Dick Barbour said...

Nice to see you so excited, and from the photos I can see why. Enjoy it!
Dick

Bruno P said...

Great pictures. Don't really have the money for a Leica here in Brasil and still got young daughter raise, so another time of life..
But your post encouraged me to have a walk tomorrow with my Panasonic GX9 and a manual Mitskon 25 0.95 so as close to your experience as I can get here..

Thanks for the post and enjoy the new to you camera.

Anonymous said...



Interesting post as always,Kirk. FYI, there is a black Leica M 240 for sale on the CAMTEC Leica boutique site (Montreal) for $3385 CAD (about $2500 USD).

Dave

Norm said...

As a longtime user of various Leica M cameras, I continue to love the ability to focus using an aerial image, rather than on the ground glass, or an EVF. As to the notion of Leica lenses being the justification for using these cameras that some espouse, I find my experience echoes your own, in that there are are a good many other lens manufacturers, both current and some now gone, which have provided me with a selection that is wonderful, suiting every need that I might have, from a "vintage" look, to "modern" acuity and contrast. Of course you need/want another M body.

hwulff said...

The chrome Leica M11 has a brass top plate. That's why it's 100gm heavier than the black one. I'd pick the black one.

bishopsmead said...

I sincerely admire this post and the accompanying pictures. I am blown away by the detail in these files. My eyesight is failing so I will likely soldier on with what I'm used to, but I am beginning to covet your current favourite cameras.

adam said...

I thought the GH5S had a great battery life then had a rude awakening when I put an auto lens on it, those pics do look good, ST is a pretty big company, they make a lot of chips in taiwan etc, subcontracted to other fabs, I suppose they must make the high end stuff in France still, there must be compromises sony etc make with theirs which there might be fewer of with a bespoke design

D. Wayne said...

Nice pics as usual. Be careful with the slippery slope of Leica ownership. Next you’ll be getting an M11.

Malcolm said...

Out of my price range I'm afraid. I shall, therefore, continue my habit of enjoying expensive cameras vicariously through your blog.

John said...

The problem with looking at your photos on your website is that I cannot really tell what camera you are using and you seem to have quite a few at this point. I mean there is no wow factor in what is captured. Nothing to distinquish what you take with this new Leica versus what you take with your other options. It just doesnt stand out. Is it more fun for you with the new toy? I am sure that it is. Does it make a difference in what you share with the viewer? Not at all. Is there something “magical” with the Leica files? Nope. Nice photos but they could be captured by any of your cameras. That is what is maybe sad about todays photo world. Where is the “wow” factor? Where is the OMG i could never have gotten that photo with X camera I needed Y camera to capture that? Maybe printing something out would provide some special result but my recollection is that do not particularly tout printing anymore. Maybe I am wrong with that. In any event, I will say the only wow that I ever got from taking photos with a particular camera was with the Sony RX1R II. I would look at those photos and just be thoroughly impressed. They were demonstrably different than anything else I shot with. And of course that was a while ago. Anyway, I love your blog, always read it, and enjoy your stuff. But show us something different or special or a wow factor. Something that you personally feel would not have been captured with just any of your cameras but only able to be captured by one special camera. Just saying it would be hard to do .

pixtorial said...

Kirk, I'm certain you've spoken to this before, but I'll drag out the topic again. Looking at these photos, you've captured lovely examples of color and form. For being "just" walkabout pics to try out the Leica, they are a nice set. Here's my thought: do certain cameras lead you seek out certain type of images? Does the tool sometimes guide the photographer? Is the gestalt of the Leica less about any magic in how it captures images and more about how it lets you see? You've spoken to this to a degree, about how rangefinders give you a unique photographic perspective (at least that is what I experience with my X100S and its rangefider-esque viewport). But is it more than that? Does shooting a Leica M flip a switch in your mind, as it were? I would love to hear more of your thoughts on this.