Leica R8. 135 Elmarit.
At the same time I still have drawer full of quickly depreciating Sony full frame cameras and lenses, no real love for the new Sony a7 or a7r and the downsizing itch that makes me want to get rid of equipment clutter. Every time I ponder the purge I seem to get an assignment that might be better served by the bigger cameras but a week or so ago I even put that to the test. I had an event assignment that I would have done with the big cameras in the past. It was all on camera flash, generally bounced off whatever was handy (a boring proposition, aesthetically). I put the flash on one of the big Sonys and was again reminded that their flash control capability isn't one of their shining features. I put the same flash on the Sony RX10 mini-cam and it provided perfect frame after perfect frame (perfect flash exposure at least...).
For the next few days the thought of downsizing hit me more and more often but just as I got ready to pull the trigger someone would call me about a job that really would demand a more shallow focus than I can get with my current m4:3 lenses, or the client would specifically request the highest possible resolution for a monster blow-up.
In the past I have capriciously capitulated to my consumer brain and lunged for change. But as I sat here contemplating it all I decided to hold pat. I'll just linger in place until something radical changes.
Funny that I am so fickle about still cameras and yet I see the video oriented cameras as nothing more than convenient tools.
I do like the look for files I get with the Sony a99 and the 85mm 1.4. It's nice. And it reminds me a lot of the kind of photos we used to routinely pull out of the Leica SLR cameras back when.
I guess no deciding is also deciding.
Hope your Monday is a fun day.
Might as well keep those full-frame Sonys. They are already heavily depreciated. You wouldn't get much for them, and they might come in handy from time to time.
ReplyDeleteIf it were me, I think the only two reasons I would get rid of equipment now is if it is broken or I really need the money.
ReplyDeleteThe A99 is already a "Sunk Cost" and why tempt Murphy the day after you sell the A99 stuff. Could be the last FF camera you ever bought/buy.
ReplyDeleteHang with the 99, as someone said it has *already* depreciated, it will further, but not by much. Smallish sensors only do so much, as you perfectly well know ;-)
ReplyDeletePerhaps rent the new Nocticron 42.5mm 1.2 for the GH3, or one of the 0.95 manual lenses available to see if they can put another nail in the coffin for full frame?
ReplyDeleteMakes perfect sense to stand pat on the still front and see video as a moving target.
ReplyDeleteSeems to me that video in still cameras is roughly where still imaging was in around 2006-7(ish): most are decent, a few are still bafflingly poor (or just odd in ways that don't really make sense - Olympus with your small range of options for decent quality video with an amazing IS system, I'm looking at you...), and a few are clearly at the front of the pack. Give it a couple of years and the video will get to where still was ca. 2009-10: basically all good, with differentiation increasingly based on outlier use cases or the way you happen to mesh with a particular camera haptically.
It seems like you would be a prime candidate for renting the occasional larger format camera, unless that's too much of a pain to do when you need it in a hurry. But it would free you up to even renting a medium format sometimes.
ReplyDelete