Search back to july 2 if you want the original comments...
FRIDAY, JULY 2, 2010
Is technology destroying art? Does anyone care?
This is the naked die of a micro something or other. We shot it last month for the semiconductor company that makes it. Its brethren will go into some sort of consumer product that will make some person's life more efficient. And the promise of that increased efficiency should have meant more free time for that person to do things for themselves. Play with their kids, wash the car, see a movie, or do art.
But it isn't working out that way. Society is using the increased efficiency to get more out of the next person. More lines of type per hour. More lines of code per day. More products more quickly to the marketplace. Cameras that autofocus faster and have aquarium modes. More profits to the shareholders. More stuff.
Cellphones seemed like such a good idea. They would free us from the umbilical cord that tethered us to the desk or to the house. But it didn't really work out that way. Faceless corporations found that they could get more "free" work out of their workers by using a virtual umbilical cord that keeps workers connected to their offices nearly continuously. And injects a sensibility that there's duty to make the job one's life.
And please, make no mistake, when I say workers I don't mean it in the old communist way: as a description of the uniformed factory people who made things with their hands or dug for coal. When I say workers now I also mean the lawyers and executives and nearly anyone who has a job working for anyone other than themselves.
I've watched the progressive strangling of people's time by new technology. Executive dads sitting in the bleachers frantically jabbing at Blackberries with their thumbs trying to get in front of a new "issue" while little Johnny makes a soccer goal that dad doesn't catch. I watched three investors glued to their iPhone screens in the middle of a play and wondered why they'd taken the time to come to the theater. You could quiz them and they wouldn't know whether they sat thru "Oklahoma" or "Romeo and Juliet".
Everyday I watch couples at restaurants staring into their screens instead of each other's eyes. They seem afraid that they'll miss something. That the world will introduce the next miracle and they want to be in on the genesis and get the announcement. So much so that they miss all the important stuff.
So, efficiency was supposed to give us time to exercise and relax and invent and enjoy and do our own art. But what it's really done is increase the work week of the fully employed, robbed them of their own un-contracted leisure time, convinced people that a salaried position means 24/7 contact (and mindshare) and left them ragged and unable to concentrate on the present and the here and now. It robs them of living life as it's happening.
And the ability to process great volumes of information hasn't done much for us either, as far as I can tell. May be it's good for predicting sales or elections. Data mining can't stop hurricanes or earthquakes but endless data availability progressively robs us of our privacy and financial security.
But none of that really bothers me. I understand better than you might think that the nature of western man is constant innovation---for good or bad. No, what bothers me is that we've used all these tools to turn our lives into something that's measured based on productivity. Volume. Throughput.
I heard a great actor speak two days ago. He defined art. It's not about which lens renders hairs on the kitty photo the sharpest or who's got the best toys. And it's certainly not measurable. He defined art in this way: Art teaches us what it is to be human.
But this is a problem because art is notorious for being unmeasurable. And in a society that values ranking and measuring above all else it gives one the feeling that art, which teaches us what it is to be human, is being replaced more and more by craft just for the sake of craft. And the craft is powered more and more by precision, performance and production and less and less by ideas and translations of human experience.
It starts in school. We, as a society, need to give as much weight to the study of art and art history, music and drama as we do the math and science courses. We need to make sure our kids are as content literate as they are process literate. I can assure you that, as technology becomes more and more pervasive the real value; the "gold", will be content.
Multitasking? I've got a bridge in Brooklyn you might be interested in.....