Monday, November 20, 2023

Trying out the FujiXWeekly recipe for the Tri-X film emulation for Fuji cameras. Camera used is the Fuji GFX 50Sii. The recipe was originally created for use with X-tran sensor cameras. Seems to work fine here.

 

So, FujiXweekly is an app that is free to download from the Apple Store or the Google Play store. It gives you literally hundreds of "recipes" for setting your Fuji camera so that it works just like your favorite film in your favorite camera. It's aimed at Fuji camera users because it uses settings specific to Fuji camera menus in order to create the final profile. 

Here's a sample: (paragraph below from the FujiXweekly.com website). 

"I found that this recipe looks best when set to ISO 1600 or higher. From ISO 1600 to 3200, the results more resemble newer Tri-X 400 film. From ISO 6400 to ISO 12800, the results more resemble older Tri-X 400 film. I want to give a big thank-you to Anders Lindborg for creating this recipe, and sharing it—you are appreciated! Thank you!

Acros (+Y, +R, +G)
Dynamic Range: DR200
Highlight: 0
Shadow: +3
Noise Reduction: -4
Sharpening: +1
Clarity: +4
Grain Effect: Strong, Large
Color Chrome Effect: Strong
Color Chrome Effect Blue: Off
White Balance: Daylight,+9 Red & -9 Blue
ISO: ISO 1600 – 12800
Exposure Compensation: +1/3 to +1 (typically)"


The selection of film recipes is in no way limited to black and white or "monochrome." I like this Tri-X recipe so I tweaked it to my taste and saved it into on of the four available custom settings. Now, when I feel the desire to be more Robert Frank-ish I spin the dial from "A" to C1 and I'm ready to shoot.

As far as I know the apps on both platforms are free. If you have trouble with the phone apps or you are religiously or philosophically opposed to apps in general you could go to FujiXweekly.com and scroll around till you find the recipes you want. Just thought I'd share this so you can try a different way to dive into black and white imaging without tearing your hair out.

If you are going to browse the images please consider looking at them on a big screen. Thanks!




































Sunday, November 19, 2023

It's getting to be the time of the year when bloggers and vloggers fire up their keyboards or their video cameras and troll for affiliate cash in the biggest way. Get ready for those top ten lists!!!

 They are revving their engines. Doing their research. Trying to find out which photographic products will be in stock and which ones are in infinite backorder status. Why? Well, there's no cheese at the end of their tunnels if the "influencers" get you excited and give you links to products you can't buy. No sale means no commission, no spiff, no affliliate cash. So you wonder why each influencer touts different stuff and different brands throughout the year only to coalesce around best sellers in the last run up to the holidays? Wonder no more. It's much easier to reach into your wallet if there is a ground swell of consensus about "how great" a product is. And how much you need it. 

Here's my biggest prediction for this coming holiday season: No one will make a top ten list that includes: a Fuji X100V, a Leica Q3, a Ricoh GRiii, or just about anything else from Fuji, Ricoh or Leica. Why? Because they are mostly backordered. No sale means no cash. 

Here's another holiday sales prediction: The Panasonic S5ii will suddenly become many influencers' favorite new camera. Why? Because it's going on sale for $1699 and B&H and others would not promote a sale item if they could not fulfill the demand for the product. The price drop and the availability means a bonanza for bloggers and vloggers because people who want/need/covet a new camera will default to the products that yield instant gratification. Stuff you can get right now. Do you think the Ricoh GRiii X will make the "top ten cameras we want for Christmas" list? Not a chance as long as it's back-ordered everywhere. The S5ii, on sale, hits a price level with less resistance too!

I predict that influencers will try to differentiate between categories in their articles this year in order to get more reach. Instead of just a "top ten cameras" list I'm pretty sure we'll see a "top ten prime lenses" list, and a "must have ten zoom lenses" list, and a "top ten on-camera flash" list, and a "top ten favorite light modifiers" list (even from the "professional" available light photographers who never use flash). 

Once they get on a roll you just know that the next category will be: "The most professional and sought after camera bags." This from photographers who only weeks ago wrote about the fact that they abhor camera bags and only carry one camera and one lens at a time. 

Essentially our "favorite" content creators will steer you only to product that's readily available because, for them, back-order means "deal-killer." So what if they shoot with something different altogether? They are not in the business of making photographs, they are in the business of making you believe you must have certain products in order to be successful as a photographer. And they are in the business of linking you up with a retailer to supply you with those products. That's how they make money...

Remember the good old days when the photographers who blogged (and who we assigned credibility to) actually made their income from.....making photographs for clients? Or the tepid old days when they started to monetize their blogs and vlogs by hawking workshops? At least when they were selling workshops they posted examples and educational tutorials while trying to get you interested in traveling somewhere mildly interesting in order to stand around with many other photographers and soak in the "valuable" insights of the "pros." Now all pretense has vaporized and what's left is salespeople who are somewhat adroit at writing or producing video that's both entertaining and manipulative. Let's make a deal!

Gone are sentences like: "We shot with this lens as we were climbing Longs Peak in Colorado..." and have been replaced with: "I haven't shot with this lens yet, nor do I work with that brand of camera, but I've heard great things about it! Here's a link." Followed by, "Please use our links and support our site." 

I guess if I had my guilt gland surgically removed I would have written about a dozen posts praising the silver/chrome kit edition of the Leica SL2 camera with the 50mm APO Summicron lens. If I did and I wasn't as lazy about blogging as I seem to be I'd scatter links for the combo everywhere. Why? Because it's got an absurdly high price, looks cool, is an aspirational buy in some circles, and its high purchase price would net me huge affiliate commissions. Is it my favorite camera? At the tippity top of my top ten list? Naw, but it would be profitable. And right now it would be a lot easier to acquire than a Q3 or an X100V. And I'd get that payment from the outfit I linked to. Hell, I could hedge my bets and have affiliate links to multiple stores...

Is all this blogger and vlogger list making and promotion a "service" to loyal readers? Are they somehow being better educated by hungry bloggers? Naw, in most cases they are being guilt driven into supporting someone else's hobby. At best. 

But "no harm. no foul." Right? Every blogger will tell you --- hell, they'll put it in writing, that they get a small kickback from the retailer but it doesn't change the price you will pay for the product. So why should you care if they get paid for taking 30 seconds to prep a link? Well, hold on there for a second. Since there are now hundreds of thousands of photography "influencers" spread across TypePad, Word Press, Blogger, YouTube, TikTok, etc. their content has killed photo magazines as an advertising venue. The market for camera is too granulated and small for national TV advertising or wide audience targeting in other mainstream media so the camera and lens makers have turned to influencers and web channels as a sole conduit for advertising. (The influencer "firehose.") And it's easy to measure sales success in a digital universe. The data is right there. The gear makers and retailers have to set aside the percentage of the product price equal to the money they pay the influencers to "influence."  To convince you that you are doing a real service to a deserving content creator by clicking through their links. And that buying the product was a good idea which might even have originated from your brain. This raises the prices everyone; influencer audience member or not.

If you avidly read a blog or tune into a YouTube channel about photography frequently, and the crux of the content is about the gear (sometimes wrapped around fluffy essays about the "art" of photography) I think you may have discovered what caused your G.A.S. in the first place. It's the continuous bombardment about products and the relentless normalization surrounding the idea of continually upgrading that product. Going after a better and better grade of crack... "Upping your game." (So cynical).

I think it's a bit sinister that blogs and video channels have become nothing but defacto sales tools. In the beginning blogs and then vlogs were made with the idea of freely sharing information with other like minded people. Now going online to actually read the very limited amount of real, original content, is like wading through a thick and poorly designed catalog to find a sentence or paragraph positioned in the middle of mercantile propaganda which is remotely interesting or instructive. All the rest is the science, conscious or otherwise, of writing or generating content that makes you feel a kinship, a resonance, a commonality with the writer whose basic purpose is to turn their relationship with you into a business --- in lieu of holding down a real job or practicing a profession. If you have any doubt, ask yourself what these people would be writing about if there were no links. No cash incentive. No candy at the end. 

I can almost guarantee you that the content would not, week after week, be about the thrill of making a photograph of a neon sign on a brightly lit street, speckled with strangers walking by,  and how the experience of emulating what real photographers were able to so 25, 50  or even 100 years ago with much more primitive gear but much more creative talent, fills current creators with pride and wonder. It wouldn't be. We rarely get that good stuff now. Mostly it's just another top ten list of crap you should buy. Or an article insinuating how much alike you and your favorite content creator are. (building that bond). 

Want a real thoughtful blog about actual photography and art instead of gear? Go read Andrew Molitor's site: http://photothunk.blogspot.com/ He's damn sure not trying to sell you anything or to introduce you to the cult of Leica or Sony or Canon.

When I first started this blog I was hawking my lighting books. I had links back to Amazon and while I rarely wrote about the books in the actual content I did include the links at the bottom of articles, hoping not for affiliate cash but hoping instead that people would buy my books. I'd get a royalty payment for each one sold. But after a while it seemed too mercenary. So I stopped. And now I write about what I want to write about and while I'd love it if the content was enjoyed and appreciated by you the end result is NEVER to sell you something. Never to pull the money out of your pocket. I think it's more honest this way. And it's a hell of a lot more fun for me.

I wrote this because I had a visceral, negative reaction to all the top ten lists I saw during all the last 10 or 15 holiday seasons. I can't believe it's profitable enough as a business to make much sense. Maybe for a tiny few but most bloggers and vloggers are working for subsistence fees. I wonder if they would be happier just having a normal job?

Please keep this in mind while reading your favorite blogs and call me out on it if I ever join the "shopkeeper" pack. 

My takeaway? I think writers and videographers should decide to just put up a paywall and see, once and for all, if their readers at large really value the content they create. It would be an interesting experiment. I'd surely pay money to read or view a site with outstanding content and no commercial interruptions. Just as Flickr does with their professional level membership. Makes sense. At least to me.

Happy Holidays! Don't buy anything on this site!!! 

Saturday, November 18, 2023

I had fun writing the "art history" posts over the last few days. Didn't like em? There are other photo blogs by the more "serious" and stodgy pontificators out there...


today we cover the idea of "selective retirement." I was having coffee with my friend Anne this morning. I made the mistake of asking about work. I should not mention work to people who still feel compelled to work full time for various reasons. Most people (not artists!) hate having to go to work and having to be at work for something like 8 hours a day, 40 hours a week. And they dislike (intensely) having to spend (USA #s) between 40 minutes to an hour each day commuting in their own cars. And not being compensated for that time. Or the gas used. Or the purchase of the vehicle required to commute. 

Being polite and empathetic Anne got around to asking me how retirement is going. And here's the disconnection between the self-employed and everyone else; we can choose to be selectively retired if we want to. 

When you work for the "man" and you would like to stop working you really don't have the option of going into the corner office and saying that you'd like to cut down to 10 hours a week. Or maybe 10 hours a month. Resigning from a job or retiring from a job is a pretty binary thing. On or off. You decide it's over and then...it's over. 

But if you are self-employed and in an arts oriented business like photography you can choose to "retire" clients you don't like and, bonus, you can pass on the jobs that don't sound fun. You can decide that next week would be a great time to go on vacation. And you go. You can decide that some clients are actually fun and gracious and you can keep working with them on projects that you've always enjoyed. There's no public forum, like the classified ads in a newspaper, in which you are required to state with conviction that you've ceased to do business or that you have retired from the field altogether. 

In the go-go years of our business (1980-2002) we averaged between 150 and 200 projects per year. After the collapse of the economy in 2008-2009 that number dropped to between 100 and 125 projects per year. As individual relevance and the bite of digital democratization dug in we were down, by 2020 to about 80 projects a year. Covid dropped the numbers much further. We started experiencing a comeback last year but it came at a time when the Covid rest break revealed to me that having free time, spare time, personal time and general screw around with your own hobbies time was a good thing. A calming way to live. A less stressful existence by far. 

In 2022 we undertook about 35 projects. And in the middle of the year I started having a conversation with myself centered around "how to retire." How to back out of stuff I no longer wanted to do. I felt like I should discontinue "cattle call" portrait shoots. I should stop doing jobs for anything less than premium paydays. I should stop working for clients with sky high expectations and insanely short time frames. And I should stop working for any company that felt like we were walking into a dystopian scene from a movie like "Blade Runner." Or any company that badly exploited its workers. Or any company that mandated an 8 a.m. start time on projects. Or any company that didn't pay their bills in less than 30 days. Or any company that required me to sign a contract with an indemnification clause. Or any company that even broached the idea that I'd sign over to them my copyright for less than a king's ransom. That brought my project workload down to about 20 projects this year. And it was wonderful. 

I only "got" to work with people I've worked with for a long time. People I enjoy working with and who value what I do. People who have good ideas and an understanding of what it takes to execute good ideas. 

So, to answer the question my friends often ask, which is: "Are you retired?" I can honestly answer that I am only selectively retired. Working on selected projects and then, in my spare time, writing a devastatingly good blog about art manifestos and photography. 

The funny part of all this is that cutting back on commercial work has had zero effect on my lifestyle, my habits and my hobbies. It's actually been a hard lesson to learn to spend my own saved money instead of operating solely out of cash flow but it's getting easier all the time. And by intentionally driving one's income as close to zero as possible one can take money out of tax deferred accounts to spend in those years with incredibly low tax burdens. It's actually a very sweet way to shift from an earned income life to something profoundly different. Funding your own life.

Which jobs have I liked this year? I still like packing up and going downtown to my favorite law firm to make portraits of partners and associates. It's environmental portraiture at its best for me and I couldn't imagine a better client. They actually have a Sumo version of the Annie Leibovitz book on a stand in their lobby. It's huge book with an even bigger price tag. https://artwareeditions.com/products/annie-leibowitz-sumo-by-taschen To say that the lead partner values good photography is an understatement. 

There's an ad agency here in Austin called, Hahn. I'll work on anything they ask for because they treat me incredibly well (waiting for my invitation to their holiday party again this year....) and they really take care to do the best work possible. Which makes me look good. In addition to photographing all the portraits for their website this year they also graciously tossed me my two most fave jobs of the year, The Texas Beef Council shoot and the Capitol Area Food Bank shoot. Wonderful stuff and very well used. Both jobs were a chance to break in the new medium format Fuji. 

Work for medical technology giant, Abbott, was fun, wonderful and a continuing education in the magic of micro tech for medical outcomes. Learning during every hour of the shoot. And with good budgets, great concepts and superb art direction. And almost instantaneous pay.

I also did a couple of book covers I like. But the difference this year? Not a single job on which I caught myself thinking: "Why in God's name did I accept this train wreck of an assignment?"

And I did not accept any jobs this year that would preclude attending swim practice. You have to have priorities.

So, we're on selective retirement. Made easier with Medicare, and with the anticipation of enjoying my first regular, monthly income since I ran an ad agency many years ago. 

Yes, I'm speaking of Social Security---starting at age 70. My first regularly scheduled "paycheck" in three decades. Seems like a fun thing to me. Mad money. Counting down the two years till.... 

The only downside of selective retirement is that it makes rationalizing the purchase of new gear more difficult. After all, why buy new cameras, lenses and lights if you have no big projects to use them on and no big clients to help fund them? I'll try to skirt that problem by having less good sense and leaning into a lifelong habit of buying what I want. 

And that's the blog about how retirement is shaping up right now. 

Dude!? You have a hole in your head?


Friday, November 17, 2023

I am curious to hear from any one of you out in the world who have actually owned and used a Leica M 246. It's the monochrome version of the M 240, which I have. Did you like it? Were there issues? How did/do you like the files?

 


I've lately reverted to shooting more and more of my work in black and white. Or, if using a camera for general purposes, selecting frames that I want to see in black and white and converting them from color raw files. There are a number of used M 246 cameras on the market. Some are very well cared for and come with valuable accessories such as multiple batteries. I'd like to hear what your opinions of the camera are and how to best use one. 

If you just want to chime in and bitch about Leica being "Veblen" goods that no rational human should ever purchase please refrain. And yes, I know about the monochrome Pentax but am NOT interested in investing in yet another system of lenses --- although I am sure the Pentax is a worthy product. 

For the most part I am happy with my conversions from color sensors but am curious if I could do better. Most of the ones I've found that are well preserved or even just back from a Leica CLA are in the $3600 to $4000 range and might make some photographer a wonderful Christmas present. It would certainly have a place in the Leica camera Christmas wreath I plan to make hang on the front door. 

Images added because I liked them the first time....








Leica M 240 with 35mm Zeiss ZM lens. 

A gallery for endless contemplation. Weeks and months in the making. Each photon and caption carefully crafted. Fully curated. Cloyingly perfect.

Plate #1. Aristolean Angles 

There is nothing magical or engaging or creative about putting a mismatched lens on an expensive camera and walking around aimlessly looking for images that might be titillating to some diffuse audience at their wit's end to read something, anything about photography --- unless the writing makes it so. Why else do we put up with the ego, snobbishness, posturing and various personality disorders of the people who blog? 

Spice rack.

So, without further ado, here is a story "methinks" might satisfy the "ole" gaping hole of emptiness in the world of post modern, post technology, post webanalia photography...

I got in my late model, small size, canvas white SUV and drove through the plush hills of my home town, heading off to buy some plastic screws with which to install a bidet onto the toilet in one of our many historic-era bathrooms. On the way to the hardware store, which cheats me and overcharges me at every turn, I decided I had enough consumer commerce for the day and decided to focus instead on my other relentless and pointless compulsion. Walking through an uncrowded and largely uninteresting urban space with a camera in my hand and a spirit of gloomy hopefulness looking for progress in that illusive practice we've come to label as "street photography." 

I walked by an interesting looking person with horns growing out of her skull and a t-shirt which read: "eat now, before it's all gone!!!" but I was too uncomfortable to photograph her. I fear potential confrontations with strangers. As I walked along in my Brentwood canvas sneakers I stuck my hand into the front left pocket of my Brooks Brothers Casual Grey Light Wool Trousers and pulled out a wad of cash. I caught myself wondering where that cash from. I lost the train of thought. But then, up ahead I saw a grizzled old man in a shiny, silver space suit. Around his neck hung a sign which read, "Please, feel free to photograph me." But I was uncomfortable with the whole situation and side-stepped it by looking at my feet and not looking up as I passed by. During which I felt the weight of my eccentric camera and weird, limited edition lens, tugging at my shoulder. But, of course, I fear confrontations with strangers so I felt justified in taking a "miss" on that particular photograph. No long term regrets.

doilies. 

Then I saw the lovely diagonals of the structure in plate #1 and a smile broke out across my chubby and precisely shaved face and I thought to myself, "finally. a subject worthy of my august and highly capable camera rig. I'll present the finished image to my friends so that they too can enjoy the spirited dynamism of the diagonal and the luscious and heady palette of gray tones. From coal black, zone zero all the way up to the barest, feathered touches of highlight as the frame flirts with 255. And so I adjusted my stance and went into the camera's menu to make a myriad of adjustments and aesthetic choices. As I was doing so a parade of nudist college cheerleaders ambled by and called out a vigorous morning greeting to me. One even gestured toward me provocatively with her pom moms.  

I'd have shot some frames but for two reasons. Firstly, I was embroiled in the many manifestations of photographic control presented by the camera's seemingly bottomless menus and secondly, because I was uncomfortable with the idea of photographing strangers. Especially so since they were nude young woman walking vigorously through a public space. Instead, I concentrated on perfecting the camera settings and mapping out how I would make the actual photograph of the modern building. How many inches to the left tor right would I have to commit to in order to get the "perfect" frame? What angle of inclination would be acceptable in order to include all of the careful geometry of the frame? Should I wait through several cycles of wandering cloud cover in order to display the gray tones in their highest glory? Should I take a break from the arduous task of making this solitary frame, which was so filled with potential energy, to go off in search of a nice sandwich (complete with farm raised tomatoes straight off the vine and glorious fresh bread, fragrant with promise?) or perhaps one of the "new-fangled" wraps everyone is discussing on the talk radio streaming channel featured on my home computer? In the end I persevered and got the shot. Its true glory is lost here but on my dedicated website I've carefully placed a 290 Gigabyte version for your viewing pleasure and edification. (Does edification have anything to do with edifices? and if so, is that word really about the science of studying buildings? Methinks it does but your mileage may vary and as long as you don't hurt anyone too much you are, of course, entitled to your own opinions...).

tea cups. 

Fortified by my first success of the day, and having already entitled it as "Aristolean Angles" I felt as though I had justified all those years of drudgery and debasement that comprised my university education ( at a convincingly prestigious school) and brought to the fore a poetic notion of photography that competed but also aligned, readily, with the work of the poet, Wallace Stevens. This image would be my "Palm at the End of the Mind." I was motivated from my very core to move on and find more "treasures of the lens" to share with you. Excuse me for a moment as I stop just here to do a quick re-write. One of many this morning.

semblance of...

Plate 2: "As goes Sisyphus there goes the lollipop of a butterfly."

In the scene represented in Plate 2 there was originally a driver standing by the door of the truck, just off center of the frame. He was dressed in a lime green jumpsuit that was festooned with thousands of tiny electric light bulbs which glowed and pulsed. He was also wearing a black, felt top hat and had on his weathered and craggy face a handlebar mustache which had been well waxed and was, no kidding, at least eighteen inches wide. When I accidentally made eye contact with him he smiled warmly and nodded, as if to say, "sure...you can take my picture." But as you are probably aware of by now the whole range of ambiguities that photo opportunities sometimes come wrapped in can, these days, make me uncomfortable. So I pretended to fix something in my camera menu and then pretended to check the stock market results on my smart cellular phone and waited for the man in the frame to step away from the scene so I could take a truly compelling photograph which encapsulates the idea of commerce combined with transportation. Truly a nod to the complexities of modern life overlayed by an appreciation for large machines which, in themselves constitute an allegory about the eventual extinction of dinosaurs. Get it? They got too big and could not survive the impact of the comet. The comet in this case being the cultural progression from carbon-based energy sources to fully electric vehicles. So much meaning in one photograph. Right?

Pet ferrets. 

After trying about 15 different angles and using an app on my phone to see if the lighting might be more advantageous in a half hour, an hour, or several more hours, I decided that I really did have a "keeper" and decided instead to move on and continue my search for meaning in an urban environment with a camera. in hand. Dammit. Another re-write rears its ugly head. 

Plate #3. "Inclusion and exclusion. the Athena Paradox.

In nearly all social constructs there is a cohort "looking in" and a cohort "looking out." The politics of inclusion and exclusion. Predicating a hard demarcation between accepted members of an area and the rejected ones. In Plate #3 we clearly see two almost square, horizontal doors near the middle of the frame which serve as metaphorical proxies for an entrance and an exit and all that this entails. As the painter, Jasper Johns, often said of construction like this: "Rectangles are cool but square creations are cooler." To which the composer, Ottorino Respighi, often would kiddingly say, "but Jasper, how am I supposed to hear the differences between a square shape and an opera." A sentiment that is often repeated by other composers. To my ears the almost squares here (hear?) represent the repression of outsiders and the regimentation of access to and from the prime collective. One touch that didn't become clear until the work was printed in a size of four by six feet is the well placed rodent trap in the lower left corner. This might symbolize a secondary and very playful repetition of the basic idea of inclusion and exclusion given that the targets for the trap may enter but not exit. But it could also be an allegorical statement about the distraction from art of death. Morbid but buttressed by the conjectures of David Hume. 

Plate #3. "Manifestation of gender pranking. In pink." 

I currently have no essay for this image which causes me
no little consternation. Open for conjecture. 

Plate #4. "The Cloistered Mind. Bifurcating Attention." 

An apparently simple visual essay addressing alienation and loneliness in modern North America. And an odd intellectual conflict given that while the copy of the signage in the background (center frame) speaks to regret for bad decisions the selling proposition is that a hamburger with meat patties, accompanied by fried potatoes cooked in oil might be a selection that would not be regretted even though the levels of fat, sodium and various heat mutated nitrates is generally not considered in some way be a good decision when being introduced for human consumption. 

The underlying assumption of the advertising copy is that a night of alcohol and other chemical abuse might lead to partnering with someone for a sexual encounter that could be fraught with consequences, the nature and severity of which are blunted by intoxication and ignored at the instigator's peril. In that way the sign and indeed the photo speak to bad nutrition as being the favorable choice in a binary selection of activities undertaken after midnight. Or indeed, in some cultures, even after 10 p.m. When in fact an infinite range of other choices could be made. Unless free will and determination have been rendered invalid.

The image leads the viewer into the conversation by canting the building's edges in order to force a secondary diagonal construct (nearly vertical) which throws the human figures out of balance while at the same time bringing a certain sense of balance to the typography on display. The addition of the microscopic-sized human on the right (an effect of converting three dimensional subject matter into the confines of two dimensions via the camera and lens and the ensuing diminishment of object size relative to the foreground subject due to proximity to the lens) plays into the composition as a subtle suggestion of the lesser role she might play in the drama of late night decision making. By capturing the male on the middle/left side of the frame, and in the process of striding forward with purpose,  the topography of the image let's the viewer know that subject's intentionality will in some way be fostered, at least subconsciously, by his exposure to the sign. Even if its effects are largely subliminal. 

Just sayin.

Given the richness of the image and its layering of meaning and context it's hard not to label this as one of the highest examples of incisive modern art. Or, as Leonardo da Vinci often taunted his assistants when observing their own work: "Jesus. My five your old daughter can do better chiaroscuro than that." After which he would use a full brush and flick paint, disrepectfully, on the assistant's work in progress. And, when confronted by historical quotes by Leonardo of this nature, modern psychologists have often said, "I wonder what Phillip Roth's mother would have said?"

That print is definitely a "collectible." 

Turtleneck sweaters. 

Plate #5. "Desolation and Emptiness in post modern urban constructs." 
or "The Honey Badger of Desolation." 

No essay for this. Entirely self explanatory. 

dungarees.

But a quick gallery note. Carefully examine the artist's unwavering talent in creating a perfect matrix of tones and balance. If you were totally color blind you might think, in the moment, that you were 
actually in the scene. A tour de force of presentations, for sure.

Plate #6. "Playful interlude." 

Plate #7. "Magenta Framed by Pink"

Challenging our expectations that true photographic art must always be experienced in black and white, or grayscale, or even monochrome in order to come into its own as being art historically relevant. A powerful visual treatise in the tensile power of color differentiation in this highly structured and confined medium. Two universes co-existing in a single plane.

Plate #8. "Print is not dead." 

Plate #9. "Dolly Man." 

A work that, compositionally, has it all. There are so many diagonals that the eye of the viewer is entranced and becomes absorbed in the angles of the road, the street, the vague and subtle lines in the street and every the perspective rich diagonal of the delivery trucks trailer. Not to be overlooked are the dual diagonals of the bearded man's hand truck. Or, in popular parlance: "dolly." 

When one adds in the implied motion of the cars and trucks receding from the frame on the right you have a combined collection of stationary objects contrasting with powerfully implied kinetic progression. Even the cars, from right to left, anchored near center with their intersection with the truck create both a diagonal and a triangle of objets. (or.... objects) which help to propel the eye of the appraiser willy-nilly through the frame. Susan Sontag might have been so proud.

Easy to make art here as this is a "diagonal rich environment."  Pro tip: diagonals are easy. First stand with both feet on the curb facing directly into the street. Now turn your body 45° to one side or the other.  Now photograph! Easy as pie. (a Thanksgiving bit of humor).


deciduous. 


Plates 12 and 13. "The artist seen by artist on various man made metal constructs of industry."

As general Ulysses S. Grant, Jr. would observe: "the first and most important step it to make sure your gosh damned shoes are well tied. You can't go into battle or the creation of art if you are constantly stumbling over you shoelaces." And "word." 

Now time for a weekend of re-writing, editing and then re-writing. Don't even get me started on moderating the comments. I wish they would just take care of themselves. 

Wooly slippers and the smoking of a Meerschaum pipe strongly encouraged. Corduroy "sport coat" with faux leather elbow patches recommended. Green tea... optional. 

Re-write. 

And, happily, I was not "uncomfortable" photographing my own feet. In fact, it was very comfortable. As were the shoes themselves.

chimney flue.