This is post #3600. That's a lot of post. Let's talk about lenses and other stuff.

Black's BBQ on Guadalupe St. in Austin.

I'm having a blast with the Nikon D700 camera and a small assortment of lenses. Nothing is new, nothing is luxe and nothing would turn heads if I was sporting it over one shoulder at a workshop or expo. 

One of the lenses I picked up recently was a nicely used 24mm f2.8 AF-d lens that was languishing on the used shelf at Precision Camera. I'm betting that if I made an enormous enlargement after shooting the lens wide open and I looked into the corners with my handy, dandy Zeiss 5x loupe I'd probably find the extreme corners to be a little soft. I wouldn't care because the lens seems to be nicely sharp and well behaved for the situations in which mortals photograph. 

I took the lens and the D700 camera with me when I went to Black's for lunch with art director/friend, Greg. The sliced brisket sandwich was sublime and the sausage link filled in the few empty spots not assuaged by the sandwich. Oh, the lens? I shot a couple of handheld shots of my lunch, just like a hipster, and I'm happy with the way it looks, works and focused.

As is my habit, whenever I have acquired a new lens, I took a spirited walk around the Austin downtown area, snapping away with the same camera and lens. I find it to be a nice combination even though I am usually averse to using wide angles for my personal work. I am thawing toward the wide angles and, at the same time I am softening on the whole issue of optical view finders. I still hope Nikon launches a professional camera with an EVF and that they decide to keep the current lens mount but I'm not holding my breath and I'm not holding these views against the D700 because it's from another era....

The other lens I'm having a good time with is the now elderly 24-120mm f4.0 zoom (the newest version).  It's funny, when I use this zoom I sometimes check the focal lengths I am using and typically find that I'm normally hanging around in the 35-70mm range. That's fine with me. I keep the longer and shorter focal lengths in reserve.

All the images below are from the 24/120mm f4.0. The lens has a plastic shell but is dense and seems solidly constructed. It's also pretty heavy but the zoom doesn't droop when you walk with it dangling by your side from a strap. Optically it's nicely sharp but does have ample distortion at the wider angle settings. The distortion should be correctable in Lightroom or PhotoShop but as with all camera and lens combos a software corner correction always spreads pixels and lowers sharpness. Starting with a high resolution sensor is preferred if you care passionately about perceived corner sharpness. 

The image just below is a handheld image from the long end of the 24/120mm. Again, I'm sure that a giant enlargement might show up all sorts of issues but anything smaller than 20x30 probably won't trigger your criticism.

Nikon D700 + Nikon 24-120mm f4.0. At the long end.

All the images below were done with the D700+24/120mm f4.0. It's a pretty fun rig. I don't mind the weight when I'm shooting for $$$ because there's so much else we're bringing along on a shoot that the heft is meaningless to me. But after spending a week getting used to the bigger Nikon stuff it was a relief to grab a Panasonic GH5 with which to shoot the product photo at the top of the blog post and to also take along to coffee in the late afternoon. Viva la difference.


  1. Ha ha. I feel like your post about BBQ was an arrow meant straight for my neglected palate. :-) First you post about eating Tex-Mex and I mention how much I miss it and Texas BBQ and then now you post about eating Texas BBQ. Oh my. I feel under attack. :-)

  2. Great to see you enjoying some classic Nikon DSLR's and lenses. I recently scratched an itch and acquired both a D300 and D700 to use alongside various more recent mirrorless cameras. Yes, they are heavy and the shutter noise not exactly subtle, however, the handling is fantastic, AF is fast and accurate (no fine tuning required on a whole raft of different lenses), the batteries go on forever and the images generated are very pleasing to (my) eye. Also, great fun to use....
    Thanks for this and all the other wonderful 3559 posts!

  3. By far, before my move to Fujifilm, the most often used lens on my D610 was the 24-120. I have no idea why that lens doesn't get more respect. It isn't perfect, but it is -so- versatile and has really great color and contrast for a wide ranging zoom. Though larger and heavier, the D610/24-120 combo made more sense than the Sigma 17-50 f/2.8 on my D7100 because of that extra reach when you needed it.

    At some point, while Nikon prices are still somewhat repressed as they are now, I should pick up a D610 or D700 and that lens. And maybe that Sigma 50 1.4 Art. Yeah, just that .

  4. So I can only conclude from Andrew's post that he must think that 40 of your 3600 previous posts must suck! I guess the elephant in the room is which 40 is he thinking about?
    I think he may have miss calculated.


  5. Doug, I only ding people for bad math if they are my accountant or a retail clerk making change. It might have been Andrew's intention to call out some of my poorer work. I can think of a few that should never have made the cut....

    (smiley icon implied).

  6. Sounds like your in training. Runners will add weights when practice, then obviously take them off for the race.
    To me I think your doing the same, practice with a heavy weight, then on a paid job you will be zipping around with the super light GH5 and 12-100.


Comments. If you disagree do so civilly. Be nice or see your comments fly into the void. Anonymous posters are not given special privileges or dispensation. If technology alone requires you to be anonymous your comments will likely pass through moderation if you "sign" them. A new note: Don't tell me how to write or how to blog!