Some more random shots with the new Thypoch Simera 50mm f1.4 lens. It's adorable.

It's been hot here in Austin, Texas for the last week or so. I go to swim practice, have coffee and breakfast, read the news and return emails. By the time I've finished with the daily rituals it's generally past noon and already in the mid-90s. By the time I get motivated to go out to photograph it's nudging the 100° mark and it just feels kinda stupid to go out in the heat to walk around aimlessly, taking photographs that aren't really part of a logical, unified project. But not today!

Today a Northern weathe front came through town and cooled us down into the 80s. And it rained. And the rain was most welcome. After a late lunch I fired up the VSL studio car and headed over to South Congress Ave. to play with a Leica M-E (typ240) and the 50mm Thypoch lens. It was raining but not a hard, continuous rain --- more of a drizzle punctuated by bigger drops at random intervals. Stochastic rain?

I wore a hat even though the UV threat was low. The hat is a convenient camera rain cover for those times when the rain picks up and seems more threatening. Mostly paranoia on my part but I'm unsure about the weather sealing on the lens so it seemed prudent to take proactive care of a temporarily unproductive camera. Worked pretty well and I sure didn't mind a few drops of water on my head as I walked along.   

I made one gear mistake. The camera I picked out of the drawer was wearing a +2.0 diopter on the viewfinder. I was wearing my eyeglasses so I didn't really need any correction to see the  50mm frame sharply but I didn't have a convenient place to stick the little, easy to lose, diopter. I stopped and had a quick self-debate. Was it more important to jettison the diopter and just use my glasses; as I do with most other cameras, or should I just stick my glasses in a convenient pocket and continue on with the diopter? I decided on no glasses/yes diopter which, of course, meant that the world around me, when my eye wasn't glued to the viewfinder window, wasn't tack sharp. Not even rusty nail sharp. More like Nerf Gun Bullet sharp. But I decided that I didn't really care if the world around me was a bit diffused and I went on photographing just the same. 

The only real issue, should you decide to go with a +2.0 diopter and no glasses comes when you want to review something you've shot, on the back screen, or when you need to engage the menu for something. Fortunately my eyes aren't so far off that squinting won't work. It does. It just makes me look dorky in the moment. Oh, who am I kidding? Any 69 year old man in shorts, Birkenstock sandals and a goofy hat, with a camera hanging around his neck, is going to look goofy anyway so why bother worrying about it?

I could go on and on about the lens and get lost in the weeds of detail but essentially it works as well as all the other M mount 50mm lenses I've tried. More than sharp enough, good detail, nice mechanics, etc. I like shooting this one wide open because I always feel like I'm getting away with something. You know, f1.4.

I walked through the touristy area for an hour and didn't really see much I wanted to photograph beyond the mannequins and a few details, but that's okay because it's an hour spent moving and taking in the weird consumer culture of one of high end shopping destinations. And it feels weird to write that because when I first came to Austin to go to school this area was very dicey. Lots of really slimey XXX theaters, sex workers working the intersections, drug deals going down and Texas State Legislators routinely being busted by undercover cops for soliciting sex or buying drugs. It was almost a thing to read the newspaper on Monday morning to see which devote, Bible thumping, conservative lawmaker had been caught with his hands in one of the cookie jars --- so to speak.

Now it's one of the pricier neighborhoods in central Austin and filled with high end retail shops and restaurants. One of three or four epicenters of tourism in the city. And still a lot of fun to walk through. If Austin really needs extra revenue the sheer number of parking meters in this areas should be a huge help...

The rain picked up a bit. My previous dose of coffee was wearing off. My hat was getting soaked. It was time to head home through the traffic generated by the 100,000+ people who'd come to watch a football game at UT Austin. And I needed to make sure I had some presentable clothes for later. A nice dinner out with the spouse. A dressier location. Might even spiff up the shine on those shoes...

Here's some more: 

I just missed these two young women taking selfies while holding a tray of pastries. 

I'm not too shy so I asked them if they would do the selfie thing all over again. 

They did. And I photographed them. And they were happy. And so was I. 

Glad NOT to have been wearing felt hat out in the rain. 

Wet felt hats always smell funky in the car on the way home...

Office window at the Hotel San José. 

And a  walkway between rooms below...

I always thought this was a fun car. 

In other news:

MJ at TOP is doing a fundraiser: details:

https://www.gofundme.com/f/the-online-photographer-would-like-to-relaunch

if you like to read his writing about photography (and other stuff) you

might consider making a donation to the cause...

Just sayin.

 

New News about Michael Johnston and the renovation and relocation of THEONLINEPHOTOGRAPHER blog. Just below.

 At the behest of one of his regular readers Mike has set up a GoFundMe site to help with all the work that will need to get done to ressurrect his blog. Seems like a great idea!

Here's that link: https://www.gofundme.com/f/the-online-photographer-would-like-to-relaunch

I have no connection to the fundraiser or the TOP blog other than that I consider Mike to be a long time friend and a great writer. I wish him continued success and a quick restart to his world famous blog. 

Every time the blog clocks another million pageviews I like to note it. It "seems" like an accomplishment. We just passed the 36 million mark.

 B. holds an umbrella in a sleet shower in Paris. The original was in black and white. Shot with an old, Leica M3 and a 50mm Summicron. I used Neural Filters in Photoshop to add color to the image. Same with the image just below...

These images were taken about 39 years ago.

I like that I've been taking photographs for such a long time. 

There is a feeling, for me, of comfortable continuity with the past.

Blog Note: MJ's blog, TOP. Info as delivered by MJ

https://visualsciencelab.blogspot.com/2025/09/news-from-michael-johnston-aka.html

Selling furniture is not that difficult. Adventures with a 4 megapixel camera and some lighting. New, old school.

 Olympus E-10 camera. Many years ago. Near the dawn of easily accessible digital cameras.

All lit with traditional, big, Profoto strobes.

Photoshop is getting better and better at colorizing black and white files. Plus, Frank showed me something from Google unofficially called "Nano-Banana" that was nothing short of miraculous.

 

From film. A Contax RTSIII and a Zeiss 85mm f1.4 lens.

News from Michael Johnston, AKA: TheOnlinePhotographer. Please read: TOP NEWS FLASH!!!

 Mike runs theOnlinePhotographer blog. It's probably the longest running, best produced photography centric blog on the web. He recently got a message from Typepad which has hosted his site for well over a decade that they'd be closing their doors and he would have until September 30th  2025 to move to another host. Mike was in the middle of archiving the past content and getting ready for a complete re-design and re-launch of TheOnlinePhotographer elsewhere; under the gun (so to speak) but out of nowhere, yesterday, the existing site disappeared. I noticed it yesterday evening and thought it might be a short term thing so I checked back this morning and .... drat. Nope. Something to do with their servers...

Seems the rug got pulled out early.

I sent a quick note to MJ asking if he would like me to send a message to his readers who also read my blog. He agreed, and I think I'll offer up this site as a communications portal for him till MJ gets his blog back up and running. 

Mike sez: He is in the middle of writing to all of his Patreon supporters and they should be hearing from him shortly. He is diligently pursuing options to get TOP up and running again as soon as possible!

Given that he's smart and resourceful and has plenty of dedicated supporters I think it's only a matter of time before we're again reading smart stuff about photography --- and anything else MJ is interested in. 

Anytime MJ sends me an update or a message to pass on to you I'll headline that post with "TOP NEWS!!!"

Stuff happens that is sometimes beyond our control. Keep checking back and we'll keep you in the loop. 

Send good thoughts and energy to Mike.

That is all for now.

"You take the baggage of doubt with you". - Kirk

 One of Yoda's most famous and impactful quotes is, "Do or do not. There is no try". This quote emphasizes the importance of full commitment and decisive action, encouraging individuals to devote their complete energy to their goals rather than approaching them with a mindset of mere effort. Or even worse, a mindset of fear or doubt.

I find that most people carry around ideas that seem to blunt their ability to make the photographs they would really, really like to make. They would doubt that the men in the image above would approve of being in this photograph. They doubt people will tolerate them if they spend the time needed to get just the right shot. They doubt that they can pull something off without some sort of confrontation so they don't try. They fear they will be told "no." They doubt they will be "safe." 

Or they doubt their ability in the first place to go on an adventure, or even point a camera at a stranger in the first place. Very few external constraints actually exist in the practice of photographing people in public. Most of the limitations are self imposed. Self moderated.

I don't have a secret formula that will convince all the people who think they will be robbed in the street for their camera that this isn't something to worry about. Not unless you've made a target of yourself --- which is also mostly self-imposed. I can't guarantee that no one will be unkind if photographed.

The role models in all sorts of photography were and are fearless. Or at least good at tamping down the fear because they feel that the cost/benefit tradeoffs of getting the shot they want skew wildly in favor of taking the chance, taking the shot, taking the time and giving the shot your best try. Much more important than the "safety" of not trying in the first place. 

Maybe it was a parent that led you to believe it's always better to be safe than sorry. Maybe it was a gym teacher who bullied you into quitting something so you wouldn't be embarrassed by a temporary failure. Maybe it was a spouse who "helped" you believe that the thing you most wished to do was impractical, unimportant and .... impossible.

But life changes all the time and you can reject the thoughts and ideas that might be holding you back from doing the very thing you wish most to do. It's a question of challenging a restricting mindset. And fixing it rarely works in baby steps. Sometimes, to get what YOU want you need to take bold action. Reject the mindset that holds you back and plunge in. You won't get what you want the most by sitting on the sidelines, growing older by the day.

Carpe Diem? or Just Cave Canem?  

I think the Leica 11-V is imminent. Beyond rumors.

What makes the Leica D-LUX 8 so good? Well, great color but even more important is the beautiful EVF. 

What makes the Leica Q cameras so popular? Yeah, it's the EVF.

Why do so many pros swear by the Leica SL2s and SL3s?

Again, it's the EVF...

I had lunch yesterday with a friend who has been doing a deep dive into Leica and Leica cameras. Much deeper than me. He was in New York for the tennis Opens and made a trek to the Leica store to see what might be new and ripe for the picking. He mentioned the rumors of an M11-V to a clerk thinking he'd get the usual Leica store disclaimer that, "Nobody knows until they announce..." but not this time. This time he got a knowing nod and every indication that the camera is coming. Why did he believe this person? Because they offered to put him on a waiting list for the new camera. That's pretty convincing. 

So, what might a Leica M11-V camera be? I'm thinking it's pretty obvious; it's probably going to be a basic M11 body but without the rangefinder or viewfinder windows to the front of the camera. They'll keep the rangefinder focusing in order to maintain 70+ years of backward compatibility with M series lenses, and because rangefinder users prefer rangefinder focusing, but the camera will be focused and composition will take place on an EVF screen, a la the Q series cameras. 

Even though it's a move that will remove some mechanical complexity I expect that it will hit the market at a higher price point than the current M11 models. And since the expected name is M11-V it's very likely that, like the P cameras and the monochrome cameras the traditional M bodies will continue to be part of the product line up. 

This new style of M, with an EVF, is what a large segment of Leica aficionados have been asking for since the highly successful launch and acceptance of the Q2 (the original Q had a sucky EVF by comparison). An M camera with an EVF for those old, tired eyes. Fully functional with the vast collection of M lenses. All presented in a historic and well loved body configuration. 

The only thing most people will not love? The $10,000 to $12,000 price tag. 

Want one? I'd be calling my Leica dealer right now to get on the secret lists I'm sure the stores are keeping. Even if they won't admit it to the general public. 

Gotta go. I've got a phone call to make.

 

Two photos from a shoot at Primary Packaging in NYC. From the film days.

 

Totally off topic. Self indulgent. Repetitive?

 

Well, it's Monday but it's also Labor Day. We usually don't have swim workouts on Monday's at our primary pool but since it's a holiday one of our coaches decided to offer the WHAC Masters group a nice, long, Labor Day morning workout. She combined our usual 7 am hardcore group and our 8 am semi-hardcore group together and extended the workout from one hour to one and a half hours. 

The workout started at 8 am but I was up at 7 making coffee and eating some trail mix. Brushing those teeth and shaving my face. Being extra careful around the area on my face with the scars from the recent surgery. Covering myself with SPF 50 water resistant sunscreen. Doing the first push ups of the day. Listening to the Chris Issac's classic, "Wicked Game" and choosing just the right pair of Birkenstocks to wear to coffee after practice. 

I hit the pool at 7:55 and we sorted out who would be in which lane with whom. When mixing two different groups of workout participants there are weird overlaps where one lane my be faster at the first workout but the territorial imperative slides in and those folks want to stay put even if the later group users have different, slower paces but also want to end up in their usual lane. The same lane. Whatever.

I swam with Ken and Lisa this morning. They usually swim at the early practice. I'd never swum with them before but I'm nothing if not flexible so I hopped in. They are both a bit faster than me but since we do sets and we do them on timed intervals it just means that I can keep up with them if I get a bit less rest than they do. It was an absolutely smooth lane share. Of course we all swim circles. You have to in a pool that has, on average, four or five swimmers in a lane. 

We swam straight through from 8 to 9:30. The total yardage was about 4500. Roughly three miles. Mixing up competitive strokes. Not a bad way to start the day if your goal is to stay in shape and to be fully engaged. No chatter in our lane. Just moving along on one side or other of the black line on the bottom of the pool.  Generally, for me, I get five seconds on the wall between 100s. At 69 I've been doing this for nearly 63 years. Muscle memory comes into play so it's probably important to make each stroke align with good technique. Why practice something incorrectly over and over again? What's that old saying about insanity?

After workout and a shower I met my friend and former assistant, Anne, at the Whole Foods flagship store to catch up on life's endless events. Now I'm back home, my towel and suit are hung up. I ate a sandwich. Drank ever more water and settled in to write a blog that few people will read because it's not about photography it's about swimming... Ah well. 

One of my many "happy places" in Austin... going on thirty years of masters workouts in this particular pool. Routine is comforting and efficient. Hard to quit something that's so much fun... so I won't.

118/70

56

I need a few new pairs of goggles...

What camera and lens am I using for portraits these days? Any issues pop up?

 

When I shoot portraits in the studio I almost always use a tripod. Really. Can't stand handholding a camera  for work in the studio if a tripod is available. Why? Mostly because I want to lock in a composition and sometimes it's important to put a bit of "air" around the shoulders of a subject in case I need to composite the subject into something else. Another background? Too close to the shoulders handheld and eventually I find the expression I want is on the frame where one shoulder or the other is cut off. Not fun if you need a clean and believable composite. Yes, you can always reconstruct the missing shoulder in post but....what a pain in the butt.

If I'm on a tripod I don't need or want image stabilization so I turn it off. That means I can use older cameras that don't have built-in image stabilization. Like the Leica SL. 

And there's something about the sensor (not a Sony!) and the in-camera color science in the original SL that I like very much. Even more so than newer SL2 variants. I can't explain why I like the SL imaging so much but it just seems like Leica got the first one out of the gate mostly perfect. And, I like working with 24 megapixel raw files better than 47.5 or 60 megapixel files. Usually the extra resolution is not only unnecessary but also a time waster in post. 

I had been using the SL in combination with the Sigma 90mm Contemporary lens and also with the big, Leica 24-90mm zoom lens. But a few weeks ago I impulse purchased the TTArtisan 75mm f2.0 AF lens for L mount. Don't fret, it was cheap.  The TTA 75mm is more mellow than the other two lenses which works with the majority of photographs I do. Maybe too much hard detail isn't a wonderful thing for every photograph. Especially of faces. I also find that I like the wider field of view for a lot of portraiture these days since the formalist days of "heads and shoulder" or tight "headshot" portraits are mostly behind us.  A bit of "air" around our subjects seems to be a more contemporary stylistic choice now. 

So, what's the catch about using the TTArtisans 75mm lens on an SL, an SL2-S or an SL-2? As far as I can tell there is only one fault and while it's not a "deal-killer" it's more of a nuisance for me. 

The issue I have is with the automatic lens profile setting the camera uses with this particular lens. And you should know that the profile comes with the lens, from TTA,  not the camera in this instance. When I look through the viewfinder of the camera and get the exposure just right, as I have done over and over again for the better part of five years now with other lenses, when I take the photograph the resulting review frame is about half a stop, maybe 2/3rds of a stop lighter. And when I open the file in Lightroom it is still...half a stop or more lighter.  

Which means it's half a stop lighter than I want the file to be which means more touch  points during processing and, if I miss on the wrong side of the exposure line I might even blow out some highlights, which I'm never happy about. 

I conjecture that the lens maker was trying to correct for vignetting while the lens is wide open, programmed in a correction and then didn't figure out how to back out of the correction as the user stopped the lens down past the point where physical vignetting was an issue. By lightening the frame overall, and with all emphasis on the vignette, they succeeded in messing up the accuracy of the exposure as set by visual confirmation in the finder by the user. 

If there was a way to turn off the lens profile setting in the camera for the lens I would gladly do that as I know quite well how to handle vignetting if it becomes an issue. But I can't. The menu item for lens profile accurately shows the TTArtisan 75mm f2.0 lens is selected but the entire selection is grayed out which means that there's no way to change the setting. Drat. And since vignetting is variable with distance and aperture setting the TTA setting supplied seems only accurate for the widest aperture at a specific distance. A coarse correction for a nuanced issue.

I like the lens enough to work around the issue by shooting a test frame and then adjusting exposure. Then working with a darker preview frame and double checking my work if I change aperture or distance. The lens does have a USB-C port so I'm hoping that there is a firmware update at some point. Sooner would be better than later. 

It's the same on the other SL2 variants as well. Oh heck. What do you really expect from an under $200 prime delivered in a metal lens body and with good optics? Compromises happen. If it really pissed me off I'd be using the little Voigtlander 75mm f1.9 M mount lens instead. The lack of communication between that lens and the cameras ensures that I can always dial in the corrections I want and they'll stay put. 

That's all I've got for you right now. The week ahead is lining up to be busy. Not with work but with lunches, coffees and meetings. And as a special Labor Day treat we actually have a coached workout on Monday morning (that's tomorrow if you are reading this on Sunday). It's from 8-9:30. My first meeting is over coffee at 10. Tight but do-able. Heads up. 

A Canadian mannequin and a bevy of the toniest mannequins I ever remember seeing... Boston. Of course.

 

Montreal ^

Boston. Below.

I love walking through town with a camera. There's always so much new stuff to see. Even if I've already seen it before...

 

I seem never to get tired of things. I've been partnered up with the same person for nearly 50 years and I still find her as engaging, sweet, compassionate and interesting as I did when we first met. It never occurs to me that I would ever be bored by the relationship...

It's the same thing with photography. I've shot well over a million frames over the last 52 years and yet every day that I step out of the house with a camera, a lens and a reasonable destination in mind I find all sorts of reasons to enjoy photography anew. Even when I go back to the same places over and over again. There's always something new. 

If it's not a new visual aspect it may be the chance encounter with an old friend, an unexpected intersection with an interesting person I've never met before. Or just the feel of a warm, weighty breeze across my face and hands as I walk down a familiar sidewalk with the camera swinging over my left shoulder on a fine strap. 

My friends call my continual focus on aspects of life and work, "discipline" but I call it "curiosity" and in some way, contentment. 

I have friends who are always flying off to climb the next mountain, the next ski slope, the next Michelin starred restaurant, the next girlfriend or boyfriend, the next museum, and to crouch near the next live volcano. They never seem to slow down. 

On the other hand I have friends and relatives who are happiest sitting in their favorite comfortable chair, next to a luminous window, reading a wonderful book. And maybe having picked up the wonderful book for the second time, looking for a different feeling this time around. A different way to enjoy the same story. Reading till the light through the window fades into twilight and someone close by is calling them to the table for a dinner made from scratch and served under warm lights in a cozy dining room. A bottle of inexpensive but serviceable wine over on one corner. Fresh bread steaming from the oven. Like warm breath on a chilly day.

For me, there is an indescribable pleasure in just walking with a camera. Walking till the light falls and it's time to head home to my own dinner and my own cozy dining room and my ever interesting companion. 

And we share stories about what we saw during our time apart. Something as simple as describing really seeing the neon "Stetson" sign for the first time. Or maybe a short discussion of a hutch that she saw that might work "perfectly" just behind the sectional couch. For placing small lamps for reading, or half drunk glasses of something in a comfortable intermission from holding the cold glasses or hot mugs against our fingers. 

Not everything needs to be accompanied by the prickly rush of adrenaline and as the old saying goes, "There is nothing new. Just new ways of looking at it." 

A camera you know forwards and backwards is more like a pair of comfortable walking shoes than a complex and needy tool. Match it with a good lens and fair weather and you've got the makings of another really nice day.

The 50mm lens is always on the lookout for a good mannequin shot. And my favorite camera seems to love the color red.