Monday, March 30, 2026

Victory Lap. Today is: "Shoot everything with a 50mm lens locked to f2.0 Day". Happy to be fully back. Oh! and some cool Leica rumors!!!

 All material ©2026 Kirk Tuck and presented exclusively at www.visualsciencelab.blogspot.com  If you are reading this on another site, without proper attribution, it is not an authorized use of the material. If you are reading this on unauthorized site DO NOT CLICK on any links in the body copy as it may infect your computer with serious viruses. Sorry to have to put this warning here but a recent search turned up dozens of similar infringements. Thanks for your authentic readership.   

No coffee for a week? That's just criminal...
Note ready ice cream scoop just to one side.
"Be Prepared." 

Recuperating from life's little setbacks if boring. Very boring. I was in the O.R. on Thursday afternoon but I was out on South Congress Avenue today with a Leica SL2-S and a 50mm APO SL and I was feeling as though nothing had ever happened. No pain. No side effects, and a distinct memory of my surgeon saying, "You'll do well. You are in great shape." 

The plan for recovery was two days without pushing it. I puttered around the house and studio, doom-scrolled the ill-conceived war in the mideast, and did laundry. I didn't lift anything heavier than 10 pounds. I didn't shave. I let people wait on me. I was compliant about not drinking stuff with caffeine or alcohol, and all that droll stuff. By Sunday I was bored to tears, had already read through the two novels I had put aside just for this whole recovery thing and was ready to get back to real life. Everything was running clear and the pain almost totally subsided. All vital stats measured and seemed to fall in the small envelope in which they are usually maintained. Homeostasis is pretty frickin' miraculous. 

When I got up this morning I broke training for recovery, headed to Trianon for a large coffee and one of their addictive walnut scones. Returned emails, turned down job offers and firmly stated that I am now retired from commercial work. I paid the cellphone bill. Looked dolefully at the stock market and decided to be fully recovered. I grabbed the SL2-S, made sure it had one of the newest SCL-6 batteries, that the battery was fully charged and that the camera had a newly formatted 256GB SD card in each slot. No sense getting sloppy. One thing I wanted to do when I got back on my feet was to spend a couple of hours shooting the new (to me) SL 50mm f2 APO lens wide open all day long.

The mantra from Leica, since the introduction of the SL APO lenses, has been that the entire family of these APO prime lenses has been designed to be fully and well usable at their maximum aperture of f2. Even the MTF curves they provide are calibrated at 40 line pairs instead of the industry standard of 30 line pairs and show high sharpness even when the lenses are shot wide open. Written data is nice but I always like to see for myself. "Trust but verify." 

I waved goodbye to B. who cautioned me to....be cautious --- but the high today is only 82° and I had on my sunscreen and a wide-brimmed hat. I jumped into my car, listened to the delicate whine of the turbo and the throaty pulse of the twin exhausts and pointed the car to my current favorite walking street in town. Traffic was light. The car felt wonderful. How silly that four days of not driving can make one feel....rusty! On the way over I drove past my favorite gas station (is that weird to have a favorite gas station?) and noted that regular gas was priced at $3.89 per gallon. I guess that was to be expected...

I really didn't know exactly what to expect from shooting at a wide open aperture in broad daylight. I was happy to be reminded that the SL2-S has an electronic shutter that goes all the way to 1/16,000th of a second and most of my exposures fell under that. I parked a couple blocks south of the part of Congress that gets busy with people. A slow plunge into the more populated parts to come. The sun was bright and, at times, quite harsh. You got warm quick in the direct rays but the shade made everything tolerable. 

I tried for a mix of medium distance shots and close ups, and more adventurous close-ups. At a certain point you can get too close and with everything falling out of focus so quickly the images shot that way have a tendency to lose context. There's a happy medium that depends partly on the distance at which one is shooting and also how much non-important detail there is in a scene. The more detail, the more you want to see what's surrounding the item you are spotlighting. I think detail shots benefit from having the main object of your visual desire standing alone and having a less detail rich close background. But that may just be my inclination. 

There's a rhythm to my walks down S. Congress Ave. I start in front of Byrd's Barber shop because it's close enough to be a convenient place to park, and except on the weekends there is always a convenient space. I pay the meters on the Avenue because unlike other places in town where I become a scofflaw, and take my chances with parking meters, the Avenue is popular enough to support roving bands of city parking enforcement officers whose only duty is to write tickets. Outrageous tickets. I don't know about other cities but failing to pay the meter here means a minimum fine of $50. I was always willing to take my chances when the fines were $20 but now I consider $50 "real" money. I use an app on my phone to pay for the "privilege" of parking. Today's bill was $2.90 for 1.5 hours of hang time. 

After parking gets sorted I find some shade to stand in and configure my camera for what I think I want to be shooting on any given day. Today I set the color temperature at "daylight" instead of waffling around with AWB. Since the camera has only 24 megapixel files I felt fine shooting raw. Don't know why I worry about file storage, since I have close to 30 terabytes of storage on the desktop, but I do. Maybe because it gets progressively harder to keep track of everything.... But whatever. Today was a "raw" day of shooting. And I wanted to be sure to set the aperture to f2. Lens cap in back pocket. EVF diopter set to its null position since I was wearing my current prescription glasses. All set and ready to walk down the strip to see what might have changed and what definitely would draw my attention. 

Walking by Torchy's Tacos is always a good starting point if we're in full sun. The bright red details on the restaurant are a fun contrast with the rich blue of the Texas sky. I was happy to see that, given enough distance from my subject, the depth of field of a wide open 50mm f2.0 is sufficient to render enough of my subject sharply to give a satisfactory impression of detail. 

The 50 APO is very quick to focus when using a single point focusing mode. S-AF. I tend to be a "center point" photographer and don't spend a lot of time moving the focusing point around with a joystick. If the methodology is good enough for M series rangefinder shooters it's mostly good enough for me. I generally move the camera to center the AF point on my subject, half press the shutter button to lock focus and then recompose as needed. It works about 95% of the time. The rest of the time I just punch in to magnify and use manual focusing instead. If I designed a digital camera for serious photographers it would only have a center metering point. Everything else takes one's attention off the image itself and makes the capturing of photos into more of a video game. You can argue but that would be a waste of time because eventually you would come to understand that you are wrong... kidding, everyone gets a ribbon...

It seems sometimes as though nothing in the neighborhood changes. Stores will remain open and in business for years. Same with restaurants. Then there is a flurry of old, established businesses moving out and new ones moving in. Last month saw the closures of two very well loved restaurants. One right next to the other. Both spaces are now under construction and it looks to me like it's going to end up as one big restaurant. And in three or four years everyone will think of the new restaurant as an "old, established" business. It just seems to be the organic nature of a tourist magnet. 

There are things that I think show off the qualities of lenses like the 50mm APO. Especially when I'm playing around with narrow depth of field and exploring the wide open imaging capabilities of a lens. Two that come to mind are cowboy hats of most varieties and very fanciful cowboy boots. Mostly details of the boots. The boots in general are, to my mind, the latest "artistic" canvases for popular art. Most are hand stitched and actually quite fun to look at. When I see an interesting pair of boots; especially intricately decorated women's boots, I can't help but want to photograph the details. It's the lens nerd in me. Well, that and having lived in Austin, Texas for the last five decades. Seen a lot of progressive, semi-authentic Texana in my time...

The place I go to take photos of boots in Austin and Fredericksburg is Allen's Boots. They've been on the Avenue for as long as I can remember and they've always been most welcoming to photographers who are fascinated by the vast inventories. The place I go to take hat photos is called Maufrais and I love the store because it is always so well merchandised. Well displayed product is just so much more fun to look at. And, again, the staff at Maufrais is both welcoming and professional. I drop by once a week or so and do a loop through the store just to see what's new and see how the light at any particular time of the day changes the look. They also have a flower stand with custom arrangements and also a coffee stand which makes very good, espresso-based coffees. 

I recently got acquainted with Guerro's Taco Bar (full service Tex-Mex restaurant) which is near the center point of my usual route. I was hanging out with photographer, David Ingram, at Jo's when we decided we both felt a bit peckish and he suggested we go to Guerro's. While they mostly cater to tourists during the weekend they are a solid choice for lunch or dinner at most other times. We were there at a crossover time. Late lunch on a Sunday. But we got seated quickly and plowed through queso and a big plate of beef fajitas. I don't think I should write "beef" fajitas because true Tex-Mex aficionados know that beef is the only authentic protein ingredient. Chicken is for non-professional Tex-Mex diners. The sides were good. The guacamole was good and while I'd like to write a review about their margaritas I can't because I had ice tea. 

David was in good form and our dining discussion was wide ranging and most interesting.He's currently shooting with a Canon R5 and Canon's 85mm f1.2 lens. I don't think I'll ever be able to convert him to the cult of Leica because he seems to be doing very good work with what he's got... 

After Guerro's is the Hotel San José with the lovely little swimming pool and the comfortable courtyard with bar and appetizer service. A wonderful place to go for a glass of wine and a plate of finger food on a nice Spring or Fall evening. A quiet respite from the rowdy nightlife outside the walls of the hotel compound. And, if truth be told, the San José is the original source of the gentrification of S. Congress; as far back as at least two decades ago...

If I wanted to do a portrait of someone while on S. Congress I would probably take them into the courtyard at the Hotel and use the open shade that's always available at different spots during the day and use a lens like the 50mm APO as close to wide open as possible to de-distract the background. No one would care or shoo you away. It's too laid back for that.

Every camera and lens combination feels different when you pick it up and begin to use it. It's like the trepidation of a first date. If you push yourself to use a combination of lens and camera over and over again you begin to develop not only a muscle memory but also a tactile affinity for the tools. A trust as it were. One of the benefits for me of having both the SL2 cameras and the SL2-S camera is that, as far as "hand feel" goes they are all identical so switching between the cameras for different uses is very, very fluid. From the handgrip to the support of the lens by your left hand, to the pages of the user interface, there is very little to slow down your flow while shooting. And the menus match.

The combination of the APO lens and the SL2(x) body is heavier than most other consumer cameras. It just is. If you are looking to lighten the load the cameras to look at, if you want to stay in the L mount family and you are anti-weight, would be the Panasonic S5 and the S5ii. But you miss out on the simplified interface and body style of the Leica cameras. You would also want to sub in a less weighty 50mm lens. The Lumix 50mm f1.8 is light and at the same time a very good performer for a lens that can be had for one tenth (or less)  the price of the SL 50mm APO. Everything is a compromise and I know for some people the weight is a serious thing. I'm not there yet but I understand it. Maybe that's why I keep the little D-Lux 8 around. 

When I'm out walking through an environment like this one I tend to keep my gear inventory really, really simple. I leave my phone and my house keys in my car. I use only one lens on one camera. I carry one extra battery for the SL Leicas but if I'm using an M240 rangefinder camera I don't bother with an extra battery because, unless you depend on live view, the batteries last pretty much forever. Or at least a few days of ample shooting. The less you carry the more attention you can pay to everything around you. 

The phone is the worst thing to bring along because it mostly just begs you to play with it, check-in relentlessly, instantly "research" shit, and basically suck up as much attention and brain power as the software programmers can manage to harvest. It's a sad trick to see a once great photographer slowly careening down the sidewalk endlessly scrolling on a phone held out in front of him like a divining rod, leading him by the nose down one dead end path after another. Leave the phone in the car. If that's too insecure then just leave it at home. If you absolutely must transport it with you at least turn it all the way off. Power that bear trap of attention all the way down. You'll notice more. You'll shoot more. You'll meet more and more interesting people. I pretty much guarantee it. 

The stop over at Jo's Coffee is a great place to slow yourself down and pay attention to the flow of the street. Grab a coffee, pull up a bar stool to the counter that faces open to the sidewalk and just be content to look and really see what all these people are doing as they parade in little groups up and down the street. Slowing down removes you from being in the middle of the traffic and gives you, mostly, a better point of view. Slowing down makes it easier to track interesting flows in the traffic. And to see people who go by in one direction and then, a half an hour later, go by in another direction. 

If you visit often enough you can become somewhat of a regular which means other regulars to the establishment get used to seeing you there with your camera. Eventually conversations are initiated and over time it gets easier and easier to ask if it's okay to take someone's portrait. If you are a congenial customer the staff looks out for you. Gives your order priority. Invents a "senior discount." Makes your visit feel more familiar and familial. It doesn't take time; it takes consistency. 

Jo's is a good place to catch your breath before you head on and discover more stuff on both sides of the street. And the street is different in the morning than the afternoon. Fewer people and the light from the sun lights up the buildings and courtyards that face east. In nice weather the afternoons and early evenings have the sun lighting up the buildings on the other side of the road and there are more people heading there for happy hours, dinners and the same kinds of walking that we all end up enjoying.

I worked with the camera and lens until my old, automatic watch (50 Fathoms) told me my time at the parking meter was running out. I was about  to head back down the street, mostly uphill and heading south when someone called out to me from a café table near the store that features my favorite mannequins. A young man sitting alone at a table with a coffee. I turned around and we struck up a conversation. He wanted to know if the camera I was carrying was a Leica. We spent half an hour yakking about cameras, cars, wines (he's training to be a sommelier) and...automatic watches. We exchanged Instagram info. A nice fellow and well traveled. It will be interesting to see if he opts to buy  the Leica Q2 he's been researching. Another friendly face I hope to run into on a future visit. 

So, finally back to the car and a quick trip back home. Into the office.  Battery on the charger. SD card plugged into the aging iMac Pro. Camera resting on an old horse blanket. My cell phone somewhere in the house. Dinner plans made with B. And then some quiet time looking in Lightroom at what I shot today and then playing around with basic tweaks to the files. Taking a bit of magenta out of the clouds, pushing up the odd colors like the reds. Looking quickly at how the files hold together when blown up. Choosing some to share so I can ask friends who come here what they think about the color and tonality I've dredged up with this particular combination of lens and camera. Every lens is different. Every camera is different. You only get to know them if you shoot and shoot and shoot. And then look and look and look. 

Life is back to normal. Tomorrow is the final follow up from the medical stuff. I'm pretty sure it will be a piece of cake. And, if it is, I'll go and find a really nice piece of cake with which to celebrate. And coffee. Always coffee. But now? always with a side of water.... 

I ran out of time to get to the Leica rumors. They're all over the web. M12 with Leica made sensor, not Sony. S4 medium format, mirrorless camera with Leica sensor, not Sony. Over 100 MP. New lenses for the S4. And, an update to the Q3; the Q4, which has more of everything we like about the Q2 and Q3. 

I'll write more about this tomorrow. Thanks!

Captions on some below.
Torchy's is a fun place to go for all kinds of tacos. Even tacos with crazy combinations of
ingredients. It's closer to fast food than to fine dining but it's a great, quick budget option 
right in the middle of everything. 



the "Hey Dude" shop is starting to overwhelm its neighbors. 
I love "Big Top" they have the widest selection of nostalgic candy brands I have 
ever seen. And ice cream. And shakes. But mostly, and importantly, candy.

If you see a nice message on a tile in a shop you might want to send 
a photo of it to your significant other. They might like it. I buy a lot 
of greeting cards, thank you cards, birthday cards, etc. at this 
particular shop so I didn't feel too guilty not buying the tiles instead. 
Be a saint, if you want, and buy the tile instead. Either way...

Vespaio was here from about thirty years. A great and early sophisticated Italian 
restaurant for a city graduating from chicken fried steak to fine dining. Well liked
by natives. Now gone to make room for something new. Someone needed to document it.



Details from Allen's Boots. Nice details from the wide open APO. 
Blow it up and see for yourself. 




Hats at Maufrais. Really nice hats. Someday I'll buy one.




Another shop closed for good. Mannequins stripped and abandoned. 

Part of the courtyard at the Hotel San José. 



People who might love their dogs just.... a little ...... too much. 

Every native Austinites nightmare. A middle aged man in leather pants, wearing mismatched driving loafers, one cell phone shoved into a back pocket, pacing back and forth while talking loud and non-stop on a second cell phone, hair dyed blonde. Super ugly sunglasses and no situational awareness. Sorry... I just had to vent. Don't be this guy. 

from the mannequin H.Q. 


Back to the San José courtyard for some mineral water and respite from the clamor of the street. 

Look what f2 does to those clouds. Soft, puffy and non-descript. 

Years walking here and this is the first time I noticed this ceramic and metal ornamentation just off the main sidewalk. Interesting. 



I'm going to say that I think the "f2 Experiment" today was successful. I like the way the images look and especially so when I blow them up and look at them splashed across the full screen. It's fun to single out a lens and use it in a very tightly boundary-ed way. You get the flavor of it more quickly than you would if you'd brought along a zoom or two or three other primes and interchanged them. Rather than fitting a lens to a scene it's sometimes more effective to fit the scene to the lens. 

Remember: Abandon your cellphone. It's tricking you into becoming dumber and more distracted. Kinda evil. We can do okay without them tagging along everywhere.... really. 

 

Saturday, March 28, 2026

I like this series from a café directly across from the Pantheon in Rome.

 All material ©2026 Kirk Tuck and presented exclusively at www.visualsciencelab.blogspot.com  If you are reading this on another site, without proper attribution, it is not an authorized use of the material. If you are reading this on unauthorized site DO NOT CLICK on any links in the body copy as it may infect your computer with serious viruses. Sorry to have to put this warning here but a recent search turned up dozens of similar infringements. Thanks for your authentic readership.   

Keeper. 

I love this image. I shot it many years ago and it's in the entry hall to our main house. I made a print that is much, much better than the above scan because it's on 20 x24 inch, double weight, Ilford Gallerie paper and I slaved over the burning and dodging for multiple renditions. It's beautifully framed and matted and has been hanging at the entry to the house for nearly 28 years now. It doesn't get old. 

I show it today to talk about a tendency some photographers have of seeing a scene, getting a quick snap and the rushing off; either out of fear of being discovered by the subjects or because they didn't slow down and think about ways they might have made the shot better either by changing the composition, changing the point of view or just slowing down and waiting for the scene in front of them to change on its own, in a natural way. 

The images below are the ones that came in the moments before the image above. Each has a different look and a different energy. I was waiting and sampling to see if I could get exactly what the fast part of my brain would identify as "the one." The slow and plodding part of my brain wanted to think about it some more and maybe go for some gelato. In all I shot eight frames. Not being very surreptitious because I was using a big, loud, medium format film Hasselblad camera with the shutter and mirror slap volume turned up to full. And I was maybe five or six feet behind the couple. I assumed that they assumed I was actually photographing the 2,000+ year old landmark in front of us (behind them) so why should they care? But to me the secret trick of this set of images is the thought/intention of not retreating after getting "a" frame. But waiting to get "the" frame. Maybe the waist level finder of the camera was an aid to the whole exercise. After all, who can work quickly looking at a screen that shows you everything backwards and dark? That sure slows one down. On the other hand I was using a 6x6cm camera so after 8 frames I was getting near the end of my 12 exposure roll and, well, film wasn't free. Usually. 



Printing an image quite large (for the times) and living with it in your home for nearly three decades goes a long way toward confirming how you feel about the work. We took all the art work down last year so the housepainters could work without endangering the frames and the glass on the prints. When the walls were bare B. and I both felt the house seemed empty and unsettled. Not finished. Once the prints went back up the equilibrium in the space returned. We have more wall space to fill but we haven't decided on more images just yet. Give us another 30 years. ...

I woke up with a start. I thought perhaps my camera and lens package was too small. Too light. And that carrying around more stuff would make my photographs better...

  All material ©2026 Kirk Tuck and presented exclusively at www.visualsciencelab.blogspot.com  If you are reading this on another site, without proper attribution, it is not an authorized use of the material. If you are reading this on unauthorized site DO NOT CLICK on any links in the body copy as it may infect your computer with serious viruses. Sorry to have to put this warning here but a recent search turned up dozens of similar infringements. Thanks for your authentic readership.  


Tech notes about this photo (above): 

It was lit with a Nanlite RGB FS-300C LED light
through a 36x48 inch softbox.

The camera used to take the image was the Sigma fp
The ISO used was 32 and the image started life 
as a Jpeg file. In Monochrome.

The lens was the Sigma 45mm f2.8 i set to f16

I decided to reward myself in advance for my extreme bravery in approaching my recent medical shenanigans. I am usually quite skittish, cowardly, anxious and unhappy to undergo any treatment but in this instance I thought I'd at least try to tough it out and appear less wimpy to my spouse, who has had years of experiences such as watching me faint at a routine blood test...

Since I thought in advance that I might finally pull off a courageous event with doctors and nurses and scary medical equipment I thought it only fair to reward myself for the effort. And since I didn't know how I'd be feeling afterwards I decided to pre-gift myself since shopping in advance might mean having a clearer head. More reliable decision making and what not. 

Knowing that I'd be out of the swimming pool and away from athletic pursuits of all kinds for about a week I was concerned about developing sarcopenia. Or muscle wasting. In order to stave that off I thought I should add a bit of weight and girth to one of my favorite cameras (the SL2-S) by adding a battery grip and by carrying the camera, the grip and a beefy lens around with me throughout the coming week. Post op.  I figured the added weight would help create a good workout scenario and at the same time would extend the run time of the camera package by way of the addition of a second battery!

So far it's working out mostly as planned. I say "mostly" because I don't think I was much more brave or resigned than usual but I have been using the camera package to do curls for my biceps and I've done quite a number so far. A big bonus is that I have not dropped the camera, lens and battery grip even once!!

The added battery grip makes the camera look as big as one of the giant Nikon or Canon sports oriented DSLRs from the first decade of the digital awakening. In retrospect, while the whole assemblage looks pretty cool as a still life subject, sitting on a tripod, it was probably one of my less well thought through purchases of late. Especially since I'm now rarely running through even one battery in a casual day of shooting and have never done jobs that require me to trudge on and on without the chance to stop and quickly change out a battery. But again, it all looks pretty sweet just sitting there. 

I rarely give out advice but if I did I might gently shoo you away from spending $400 on a used battery grip that you will most probably use once and then recant. But there it is.

The medical procedure went well. I no longer have the deed and title to a big, nasty kidney stone. Now...what to do with a heavy, ponderous battery grip? 

Just sayin. 

On the other hand the Sigma fp pretty much nails it as a studio camera. I'm loving playing around with ISOs as low as 6. That's right, SIX. Not much grain in the files but more detail than you can imagine. Perfect match for powerful LED lights....



New note: The battery grip for the SL2 is still available at some Leica dealers.
Current pricing for new?  $1,088.  USD

Friday, March 27, 2026

A guest post by Henry White. Progress report on my boss at VSL...

 All material ©2026 Kirk Tuck and presented exclusively at www.visualsciencelab.blogspot.com  If you are reading this on another site, without proper attribution, it is not an authorized use of the material. If you are reading this on unauthorized site DO NOT CLICK on any links in the body copy as it may infect your computer with serious viruses. Sorry to have to put this warning here but a recent search turned up dozens of similar infringements. Thanks for your authentic readership.   


As you might know my boss, Kirk, is usually as healthy as a ghost shark. Yesterday he went in to surgery to get a huge, recalcitrant kidney stone demolished by a high tech laser. He begged the doctors not to anesthetize him but rather to let him bring a camera into the O.R. to record every exciting minute. The request was denied. As was the request for the pre-op extra large latté with three extra shots of espresso. 

He was a bit groggy from the anesthesia when he got back home but wanted to "take a few laps around the neighborhood" and he was already tying his running shoes when the VSL chairwoman of the board stepped in and put a stop to it. Chagrined and multiple times denied he comforted himself with a large carton of Trader Joe's (amazing) Chocolate Mint Ice Cream. And then watched educational television from England old episodes of "The Big Bang Theory" intermixed with old James Bond movies...

It's less than 24 hours since the procedure but he already seems overwhelmed by having to "take it easy for a few days.." When I descended into the cavernous underground offices of VSL this morning at 7 a.m. he was already at his desk re-writing some Anthropic LLM code to make it quicker, neater and more proficient for his personal projects. And he had already sent a few suggestions about neutrino communications to a friend at Space-X who ..... quite frankly was stunned by the elegance of K's solutions. 

He seems to have made an effective and spirited overall recovery but every once in a while I hear a howl of agony from his bathroom as he attempts to pee. Screaming, "This too shall pass!!!" 

Argh. 

He should be well enough to write his own stuff tomorrow....   Best, H.W.



Wednesday, March 25, 2026

Revisiting the Sigma fp as a low light, night time camera. Plus: renewed respect for the Sigma 45mm f2.8 i lens.

 All material ©2026 Kirk Tuck and presented exclusively at www.visualsciencelab.blogspot.com  If you are reading this on another site, without proper attribution, it is not an authorized use of the material. If you are reading this on unauthorized site DO NOT CLICK on any links in the body copy as it may infect your computer with serious viruses. Sorry to have to put this warning here but a recent search turned up dozens of similar infringements. Thanks for your authentic readership.  

Spouse out of town. Dinner dishes washed up. No desire to spin my wheels streaming anything. What to do? Oh, yeah, grab a camera and a lens and go out for a night time walk and see how different everything looks after dark. But which camera? Which lens? Which shoes? 

The shoes were easy. It's been warm here this week so, of course, Birkenstock sandals. As far as cameras go I've been bumping into my little Sigma fp all week long so I took it as a sign that I should show that six year old studio veteran some attention. Seemed natural to pair it with the 45mm lens since it originally came bundled with one. I made sure the battery was charged and a memory card was inserted. Switched the camera to shoot black and white Jpegs and headed out the door. 

While an fp without an EVF, or the jumbo sized hood for the rear LCD, is never my first choice for shooting in bright daylight at night it's a totally different thing. The LCD is easy to see when everything but your subject is plunged into darkness... I like the monochrome settings on the fp after I've added a couple notches of contrast to the mix. I've got the camera set up to go to sleep pretty quickly and it's kind of annoying to have to wake it up but that goes a long way toward providing more battery life. Which can be a weakness with this camera since it's doing a lot of processing with a mini-sized battery. Add in an "always on" screen if that's your preference and you'll need to pocket a couple batteries to get through a shooting day.

The Sigma fp and the 45mm were an antidote for my recent foray into the Leica "nose bleed" region of SL APO lenses. When I bought the Sigma and its lens the purchase price was under $2K. And over the years I've often been impressed by Sigma's color artistry. (As opposed to the idea of "color science"). 

The fp is an odd-to-handle camera for those raised on the usual SLR, DSLR and mirrorless cameras from  other makers. It's a small brick with a few controls on it and no frills. No EVF ( you can add one...). No In-body-image-stabilization. No ergonomic grip for your right hand (you can add one). No comfy curves for happy handling. It's just a brick with a lens on the front and a (non-flippable) screen on the back. But it's the perfect camera for the photographer who keeps whining about "wanting more friction in the process..."

And, that would be me. 

The camera has a great imaging sensor that's 24 megapixels. It's got a generous range of color modes and a few techie touches such as ISOs down to 6 (six) (you'll want to use a tripod for those lower ISOs). Another feature that went missing is a mechanical shutter. You get an electronic shutter. You learn to live with it or you move on to another camera. I've learned to live with it since I am not a sports photographer. You won't see me at the F1 track sucking down Champagne and trying to decipher some arcane Sony menu so I can shoot at one hundred frames per second... But lacking so much equals so much less to break, wear out, fail. 

No mechanical shutter = far, far fewer moving parts. No floppy screen delivers self-explanatory robustness. No IBIS means no sissy photographers will own the camera... only those with arms of iron and wills of steel (dreadful hyperbole). Actually, I'd love it if this camera had IBIS...

And so, quite obviously, this is not the camera for everyone. But I had fun with it and that counts for something. It was a nice break from perfection. And a nod towards classical minimalism. Which is refreshing. Especially on a warm (but not too hot) evening when one just wants to ramble around and look in the windows of closed shops and restaurants and maybe photograph a few neon signs. 

The hardest part for me last night was resisting the urge to bring the camera up to my eye to focus or compose. I had to resort to dirty baby diaper hold (which has been subsequently renamed as: cellphone dysmorphia paralysis, a condition in which any photo subject causes you to have tiny Tyrannosaurus Rex arms with which to hold your picture taking apparatus at kinda, but not quite arm's length). I'm embarrassed to hold a camera in this fashion and embarrassed to compose on a rear screen with the camera held at arm's length but I'm working on it with a team of photographic psychologists, one of whom suggested sticking a two foot dowel out of the back of the camera to keep my face at the right distance. One poke in the eye is enough to convince that's a bad idea. Another suggested that the traditional grip, camera-to-face, had its birth during Freud's career, positing that those eye-to-machine photographers were suffering from the fear of loss of intimacy with the camera. And the camera being a substitute for a human partner. Alternately the result of unresolved Oedipal issues. 

But resisting the urge to commit face-to-camera contact I finally got used to using the camera in this primitive mode and soldiered on into the night. 

While it might be more exciting to write that I was in constant danger during my after sunset walk, that predators lurked around every corner, that the risk of theft or even armed robbery was enormous, the truth is that the walk was mundane, adrenaline and cortisol free, and actually quite comfortable. I am of the age now at which younger woman smile at me in passing almost with a small dose of pity. Young men nod and are well behaved when I walk by. Older couples seem delighted to see another of their cadre out enjoying the moment --- while I'm pursuing a hobby that most have just assumed has passed its expiration date. So, happily ignored or treated with gentle greetings. And if I had been robbed at gunpoint what would the perpetrators have gained? A six year old, well used and not very popular camera, and a couple replaceable credit cards. A lot of stress over not a lot...

I have an embarrassing little thing to confess. I do a better job fine-tuning unhurried compositions when I can see the image on a two dimensional screen. A flat screen. As opposed to putting my eye up to a finder tunnel. Even a very well made finder tunnel. It's probably mental muscle memory of the decade or so in which I used a Hasselblad with a waist level finder and....a flat focusing screen; no pentaprism. Or the decade before that when I did my composing on the upside down and reversed focusing screen of a 4x5 inch view camera.


Look at the file firmly holding on to the highlights on the polished, 
white surfaces of the shop mannequins. A nice test of highlight 
resilience. And with nice tones. 

I've written above about the faults and weirdness of using a brick of a camera without aids to better photography but now I should talk a bit about why I continue to like the camera and why I use it every time it surfaces from under a pile of paperwork or old swim towels. Or why it sometimes spends weeks at a time in the backseat of the car, also covered with old hats and books I meant to read at the coffee shops. 

I love it because the Sigma fp, with the 45mm f2.8 Sigma lens, is so small and easy to carry around with a rope style strap. It's because the sensor was near the first of a current generation of BSI, full frame sensors that can deliver relatively clean and noise free files at ISOs we only used to dream about. Some of the images included in this particular blog post were done at ISOs as high as 32,000 and even though they started life as Jpegs and were NOT subjected to A.I. noise reduction schemes, I can barely tell them apart from the ISO 1600 or even 800 photos. 

The files are not only clean but endowed with great dynamic range in that even Jpeg files, when shot at their highest quality, have highlights that don't burn out and shadows that beg to be opened a bit in post; and without penalty. Work with the raw files and the camera's imaging chain is incredibly competitive with anything currently on the market. And, to be honest, I prefer the Sigma fp color renditions to those from my herd of Leica cameras. I'm never sure which ones are more accurate but I'm certain about which I find more pleasing.

I'm sure the young couples walking along the sidewalk and eating bespoke ice creams from various posh vendors thought me odd as they passed me by while I was carefully making photographs of mannequins in my favorite windows. Thought me odd for using an actual camera instead of my phone. Thought it odd that an old man would be interested in female fashion. And found it exceedingly odd that I was able to resist the strong lure of freshly made ice cream, in all of its varieties. But they passed by and seemed, as a group, to be enjoying an uncrowded and comfortable visit to the area. 






Much has been written about the 45mm f2.8 Contemporary lens from Sigma. Some laud its "character" which is code for: this lens is blistered with anomalies. Others, who perhaps waved the lens next to a camera for a moment before writing about it, have bought into a fable that the lens is "soft", "unsharp" or soft focus-y when used at its maximum aperture.  But they are mostly wrong. Yes, the lens has its own look but it's not about lack of sharpness or contrast. One can see this in the texture of the clothes on the mannequin just above, or in the sharp edges of the in-focus ceiling fan in the shot just below. 

The lens is sharp even wide open as long as you aren't trying to trick it into becoming a macro lens. It's a lens that's designed, I think, to be used from about four of five feet to infinity for good sharpness. And, surprise!!! but most lenses without floating optical elements are only optimized to be at their best at one focused distance. Generally about 50X their focal length --- but in the end the actual, optimum distance is decided by the lens designer. If you want a lens that's sharp everywhere, at every focused distance, you'll want something like the Leica SL APO primes which have floating elements to compensate for every change in distance. But be ready to pay for them even if, for most images, it's hard to see the differences between them and fine lenses like the Sigma. I know. I own and use both...
I think I was drawn to this combination last night because I had been reviewing a post about my maiden voyage, as a young photographer, to Europe, and I liked the black and white images I took then. There was both a softness and a sharp focus to the images and even when I missed the "ultimate" point of sharp focus I liked the feel and the tonality of the files. Much the same way I like those from the fp. 

One of the big "knocks" on the fp is the lack of IBIS. I know, I know, once you've had it you never want to do without. But what I found is that by setting the Auto-ISO to about 1/125th of a second or, even more conservatively, 1/250th of a second as the slowest shutter speed, the need for IBIS vanishes with normal focal length lenses. Even more so with wide angles. Sure, the camera might need to venture up to 1/32000 ISO to nail the exposure but the camera can do that and any imperfections seem to add to my appreciation of the final image. 

IBIS really comes into its own when shooting things that don't move while using longer lenses. Introduce subject movement and faster shutter speeds take precedence as the primary means of making sharp photographs. I hedged my bets last night and used 1/125th of a second because there was little to nothing at stake. And because I've done this stuff before and could predict a lot of how things would turn out. Would I like it if the fp had IBIS? yes, but then it would be different; it might need to be bigger, heavier, or slower to use. I bought the camera knowing it didn't have IBIS and just as I thought six years ago, knowledge is as helpful as a feature. 

I only paid to park for an hour and a half and when I looked at my watch I found my time on the street was almost at an end. I kept looking as I walked back up the street I'd come down. I don't know why I thought the street would be different in appearance from the opposite direction but it was. And that felt nice. 

When I got home I looked at the images on the rear screen of the camera and I was pleased. The images had the feel I was looking for. A continuity with images I'd made almost fifty years ago with Tri-X film  and a rudimentary camera (which I don't really need to remind anyone but that old Canonet (film camera) lacked IBIS and fast ISOs and all the rest of the photo-crutches and we were still able to come away with images that have grown in nostalgic value over these long years). Having a current camera that focuses itself is about as much automation as I wanted last night. 

After I reviewed the images while sitting on the couch I called my spouse to check in with her. She was visiting relatives and all was well. After the call I raided the refrigerator and freed up the remaining chocolate mint ice cream from the freezer. It was delicious. A nice capper to a day and an evening well spent. 

The boot shine station at Tecovas Boots. 




shot of a Daft Punk (band) poster through a shop window. 


An early face plant at something silly I said some 50 years ago. 
A nice way to sum up a group of images about....nothing. 

What an adorable, little watch.