Monday, October 11, 2010

Looking back at optimistic writing. This started life as a side bar.


I wrote this in the beginning of the year.  I'm sharing it now because I feel that the optimism reflected here is warranted.  The markets may have shifted but business is coming back.  Let's get ready:


It's a new year. I'm smiling

So it is 2010, the market for advertising and commercial images is in shambles and no one really knows what to do.

Why am I smiling?  Because I think the market will recover and build and be stronger than ever before.  It's just that we might be doing different things than we were before.

I'm pretty sure we're going to be doing video.  That's fine.  I've owned my own sixteen mm Bolex film camera.  I've shot projects on Super8, 16mm, 35mm, one inch video, Beta SP, Hi8 video and now Mpeg video via a DSLR.  And you know what?  The lighting is the same across the formats, the camera moves are the same and the tradition of visual storytelling hasn't really changed much either.

My favorite assignments are magazine style videos for websites.  I've been doing a bunch of them for Glasstire Magazine with my friend, Will van Overbeek.  I love the idea of creating video content for different media.  I'd love to make a bunch of programs for the iPad and for the other tablets that are sure to come shortly.

I think there is a market for really good decorative art.  Perfect pieces of art to hang in homes, offices and business public areas.  I've recently had a few sales and much interest in my work from West Texas.  Finally,  I think that the market for good portraits will revive and grow.  It's just that now a portrait might be a combination of still and a short introduction interview.  Multiple uses and multiple formats.

Finally,  I think the market for advertising and editorial images will grow again as art directors rediscover their courage and push clients to do work they can both be proud of.  That will take imagination and the budgets to produce custom work with well thought out concepts.  To participate we'll have to hone our stylistic chops and show what we want to share in.

If you are a potential client here's what we should do together:  1.  Make great art.  2.  Come up with new concepts and styles that will give you or your final client real differentiation.  3.  Leverage moving pictures on the web and in handheld presentations.  4.  Integrate writing, photography and video into cohesive creative packages, like a meal prepared by a great chef instead of selecting each portion of a meal from a steam table......cafeteria style.  One vision, one team.

Who knows what we'll be able to accomplish.     www.kirktuck.com


Crazy Business. The search for alternate lighting.

One of the crack staff at the Visual Science Lab holds the KRT-LF2007zorbato beta 2.0123.  An assembly of "under the sink" florescent fixtures, white gaffer's tape and, of course, a well placed Bungee cord.  The background is subtly lit with actual daylight.


The universal lighting instrument doesn't exist.  Yet.  But that doesn't stop intrepid or misguided photographers from spending time and energy looking for alternate light sources.  Something different from the ubiquitous shoe mounted flash unit.  Witness the proliferation of low cost florescent lights recently aimed at the gut of the photo market.  Marvel at the sheer number of "me too" monolight flash units pouring out of China.  And share the agony and the ecstasy of my breathtaking dive into the pool of LED lights recently.

There area couple things driving this new lighting evolution.  One is the introduction of generation after generation of digital cameras with built in (and very, very capable) HD video capability.  It's like having a chocolate bar or a small bag of potato chips;  you just have to try them.  Take a bite.  It's the same way with the video stuff.  After most people take a big bite of supposedly sexy video they recoil from the whole enterprise.  Holy crap!  Video actually takes enormous amounts of both planning and work to do well.  Surprise!  But that won't stop people from giving it a try.  And when they do the first two things they discover are:  Lighting helps.  And flash doesn't work.

This leads them on the "Journey of Continuous Lighting Tools".   At first blush the time honored tungsten movie lights comes to mind.  But the joy is short lived.  The lights are hot.  Hot enough to quickly destroyed the filters you put on them to convert their tungsten light balance to match daylight.  Hot enough to effect your air conditioning bills.  And the lights suck up power.  Lots of power.  Enough to pop circuit breakers left and right.

That leads people to florescent lighting.  Which leads people with deep pockets to beautifully color corrected Kino Flos but leaves those of us with shallow pockets to try our best with Home Depot fixtures or the cheaper camera store/Frankenstein lighting units.  Some are really good.  And with high quality, full spectrum, high CRI lamps can be really, really good. But most miss the mark when it comes to color matching with daylight.  And the tubes, being glass, are big and fragile and filled with toxic mercury (well,  not "filled" but there is mercury in them....).

That leaves LED lights.  And so far I'm having fun playing around with them.  I've bought a couple of "no name" bigger panels from vendors on Amazon but I'd really like to play with the entire Lite Panels catalog of lighting units.  The panels I have now put out a fair amount of color correct light and are both "green" and cool.  The one thing none of the continuous lights do is to freeze action well.  For that you either need a lot of light or a bright FLASH of light.  But I've been eyeing  progress from Lite Panels of a version of their product that can be synced to your camera and, when you trip the shutter, the panel's LED's do a quick burst of light that's 400% stronger than regular "full power".  Makes sense since the turn on time of the LED's is nearly as instantaneous as that of a Xenon flash tube.....

When the manufacturers perfect this instant flash technology and bundle it in with their regular continuous performance these LEDs could become the Universal Light we've been looking for.

Related but having nothing to do with technical details is the fact that I'm always looking for interesting looking light.  (That was a convoluted sentence.....)  and the ability to use LED's close in, and in radically different configurations, means a different aesthetic lighting method and that means a new look.  Or the creative adaptation of an existing look.  At any rate, it means constant exploration, which = fun.

More fun is a good thing to have.

Note:  I just found out that two local cinema rental shops in Austin rent Lite Panels......hello?  Also,  if you've purchased on of the ePhoto 1000 LED lights will drop me a line and let me know how you like it?  It's next on the list.  Must hide list from family.....

Saturday, October 09, 2010

My take on the Canon 60D.

So.  I have had a Canon 60D for all of two days but I've already learned a good deal of stuff about the camera.  When my friends who shoot Canon ask about it they generally ask me two questions.  The first one is about how good the autofocus is and whether it will work for sports.  The second question is usually about how good the high ISO image quality is.  As for the AF.......works fine for me.  But lately I've been more interested in how well the camera can assist me in manually focus different Zeiss lenses.  When it comes to IQ and noise at high ISO's I guess the easiest way to find out is to round up a snarly looking teenager and have him sit still as I try a few exposures at every ISO setting and then plop them onto the computer and take a look.  

What I've shot below are images of Ben at 100 thru 6400 ISO.  I shot with two 500 LED lights covered with Rosco toughspun diffusion.  I set an aperture of 2.2 all the way through and changed the shutter speed in step with my changing ISO's.  I didn't change the lighting intensity, distance of subject to the lights or any other parameter.  I shot in basically the default settings.  Most importantly I shot with the noise reduction set to standard.  The files are Jpegs.  They started life as Large/Fine.  No changes were done in post.  No extra noise reduction added.  The color setting was "Standard".

It's pretty easy to see that the color and the exposure remain pretty consistent from ISO 100- 6400.  If you enlarge the 6400 exposure you will find some color noise which I think could be pretty well ameliorated with a bit of noise reduction in Lightroom or PhotoShop.  The sharpness remains high.  I could have done this test in raw but then it becomes, partially, a test of the raw converter as well.  If the camera can do this nice a jpeg right out then chances are the raw files will be pretty easy to handle as well.

Yes.  I know I would have gotten more hits if I used a "hot swimsuit model" but Ben was already hanging out in the studio and the fee was reasonable.

Ben ISO 100
Ben ISO 200
Ben ISO 400
Ben ISO 800
Ben ISO 1600
Ben ISO 3200
Ben ISO 6400


So much for the nerdish pixel peeping.  A camera is only half measured by its performance around these parts.  The other half of the measure is the way the camera handles.  While some of the controls have been moved around and some button commands that were dedicated on the 7D and 5D2 have been placed on the "Q" menu I was able to move through the "what the hell does this do?" stage pretty quickly.  Most of the menu items remain the same.  I have medium sized hands and find that the 60D fits me much more comfortably than either the 5D2 or the 7D.

I think the autofocus is faster and more assured than on the 5 and less lethally quick than on the 7D.  As I only shoot swimming, and then usually in bright daylight, I think the performance will be great for me.  Most of my use is for walk around art.  And that doesn't happen at the speed of light.

Here are five random things I like about the 60D:

1.  It uses the same battery and charger as the 5 and 7.  Yippee! More back up batteries and chargers.

2.  It is smaller and a bit lighter than the other two cameras.  Big bonus if used as a street shooting machine.

3.  It still feels solidly built.  Very solidly built.  Perfect balance, too.

4.  It does really great video.  The footage looks nice.  The sound quality is good.  The menus are straightforward and the swivel LCD is perfect (and beautiful to look at).  If you needed to choose a good, all around video platform I think this is the body I'd pick.  I'll let you know more after I've had a chance to shoot it in hot weather.  That's the nemesis of the Canons for video.....

5.  Strangely enough,  I like the SD card memory.  I have a ton of cards.  You can carry a pocketful.  They're plentiful, cheap and work.

Here are a few things I think are not so good:

1.  ..................


Okay.

As far as image quality goes I find that I like the way it renders flesh tones better than its predecessors.  I also like how quick the black out time in the finder is.

The bottom line is that the camera is sharp enough and fast enough for professional work at a high level. Two of these cameras and a small selection of lenses would be a great starting point for someone who wanted to venture into both still photography and the world of multi-media.  For my shooting I'd choose the following lenses:  15-85,  60 EFS macro,  70-200L (whichever one you can afford.  They are all good.  My preference is for the f4 with no IS.  It's cheap and lightweight but very, very sharp).  The whole package would be under $5000 and you'd be ready, from the camera angle, to compete in the professional arena.  Of course the lights and stands and microphones and stuff are a whole other post.

Why did I buy a 60D if I already had a 7D and a 5D2?  I wanted a stealthier camera to take out on walks and when shooting for myself.  I wanted a back-up for the EFS system which I find myself using more and more.  The 5D2 makes nice files but I find myself not particularly enamored of its feel and ergonomic functionality.  I'm keeping it around for the really nice background blur I can get with sharp lenses but, at ISO 100-400 I feel that the other two Canons yield files that are just as nice.

Cameras need to hang out in pairs.  The EFS cams are my day to day cameras.  The full frame seems to always be a special use tool.  Especially in video, where my problem is usually not enough stuff in focus rather than too little.

Should you buy this camera?  Hmmmm.  How the heck should I know.  Maybe you're very happy with your 1DSmk3 or your D60.  If it works I guess you don't need to change.  I spend a lot of time with a camera in my hand and a lot of time messing with files.  If this keeps me from having to change lenses as often when out on location and the files process better then I can easily justify the expense.  Especially since the markets are visibly starting to recover.

Hope life is good.  More to come.

Friday, October 08, 2010

Twenty seven years at the bakery.

Every weekend for twenty seven years, barring those weekends when I was out of town,  Belinda and I would go to the bakery, meet friends on Sunday morning and drink coffee.  When Ben came along he became a bakery regular as well.  The other family member that never failed to tag along was my camera.

This was taken with a Leica R8 and an 80mm Summilux.  Color E-6 transparency film.  The special treat for little kids at the bakery was a drenching rain on a hot summer morning.  The best of all possible worlds.  Then getting dried off and finishing your chocolate croissant and milk.

The image that makes me think of snakes and danger.

Do you remember the first time your child was face to face with a water moccasin? I do.  And while I was too busy scooping him up and rushing him away to photograph the snake, this image brings back all of the sights and smells and sounds of that late afternoon in September.  We were out walking near the Lake.  It was called Town Lake back then but now it's called LadyBird Lake, after the late LadyBird Johnson, the wife of former president, Lyndon Baines Johnson.

It was a Sunday afternoon and we were on the docks of the Austin Rowing center.  Everyone else had long since gone home.  Ben was trawling the waters with a stick he'd found on the trail.  Boy+Water+Stick= Big Fun.

I was on the far end of the dock when it happened.  Ben was in the middle of the dock. At the very opposite end from me a big, mean looking water moccasin (cottonmouth) lazily slithered out of the water and started doing his snake locomotion toward Ben.  Uncoiled, the snake was easily six feet long.  I ran to scoop up Ben and move him out of danger.  At the same time a blur entered the scene from the land to one side.  It was a large black dog.  It ran straight for the snake, barking furiously.    It's owner was running up behind it.  I had Ben in my arms and I was moving off the boat docks.

The snake took a look at the dog and gave it a,  "I could take you if I wanted to...." sort of look and then slid back into the water.  I love the idea of that dog.  The dog as protector.  The dog's owner called him over and they continued to run around the lake as though nothing important had happened.  I'll never forget that dog......

I was too into the "parent moment" to step back and record the process.  And I hope if you find yourself in a similar situation you'll make the same choice.   But every time I see this image the whole adrenalized memory comes rushing back.

The power of the photographic still is to translate a whole afternoon into one inch by one and a half inches of transparent film.

Looking forward, Looking back

Right now I have a living room full of teenage boys playing some video game with great enthusiasm.  My son is now almost 15 years old, and yet,  it seems that only a few months ago he looked liked this and smiled like this.  I'm lucky.  I have photos from every stage of his life.  Photos taken in the stream of living and not just at "special occasions".  What was this special ocassion?  Nothing more than a mid-week lunch together in the Summer.  We'd gone to Hilbert's for some old fashion, Texas burgers.  Grilled.  Mustard, lettuce, tomato and onions.  And fries.  We sat on the stools that spin around.  The yellow light came through a yellow shade on the window and I haven't corrected it because that would change what it really was.

Ben's mom is in the background.  It's hot outside but our car is parked in the shade with the windows open.  We went home after this and Ben and I sat on the floor of the living room with the ceiling fans twirling overhead and the air conditioning pumping out cool, clean tasting air.

I remember exactly how I shot this.  Almost as if the exif info was embedded in my brain:  Leica R8 camera.  50mm Summilux as close to wide open as I could get it.  And I can see the film in my scanner:  Kodachrome 64.  The camera doesn't matter.  Only the presence of mind to shoot while the expression presented itself.

Isn't this one of the rewards of photography?  To be able to look backward as the whole world moves forward?

Wednesday, October 06, 2010

I spent monday evening talking about business. Wanna know what I said?

I'm including this photo of my third book at the top of this column because this is the official textbook for the photography business courses at Austin Community College.  That's where I lectured Bill Woodhull's classes this past Monday evening.  Here's what we talked about:


After the usual introductions we plowed into the general topic that Bill wanted me to address to his class and that was The Business of Photography.  Basically, how to cut thru all the conflicting stuff you pick up on the web and on the street and put together a strategy to have a sustainable career.  The talk was pretty much non-linear but I'll put it down in the order I remember it.

1.  We are not creating a product for a one time sale, like plastic flowers or beer or a meal.  We are creating intellectual property which we own.  We keep the copyright and we license uses of that intellectual property (cleverly disguised as photographs or movies) to our clients.  They pay us to create it and then they pay us to use it.  And we can sell it over and over again.  Just like all the software you "buy".

2.  Why would companies pay a lot for photography when they can get it cheaper?  An ad project is like a big inverted pyramid.  The huge costs are for the actual placement of ads or commercials.  Next down is the huge cost and overhead of the advertising agency.  Next down on the pyramid are all the costs of production.  From printing to all the crew and models you'll use to create the photography.  At the very bottom of the cost pyramid is the photographer's fee.  If the project budget is $100 million dollars then a fee of $10,000 is way less than one percent of the total budget.  In fact $100,000 is way less than 1% of the total budget.  Incredibly, even if you were to charge $999,999 it would still be.......less than 1% of the budget.  But if the image in the ad is the biggest and most important element in the entire ad isn't it the most important lever to move the intended audience?  If the agency screws up and hires a photographer who can't get just the right image then they've actually blown the entire $100 million dollar campaign.

So if they have a choice between a really good photographer at $10,000 and the "almost the best" photographer at $25,000 and the ultimate (done this before and everyone loved it) photographer at $50,000 do you really think they'll take a chance in order to save less than one tenth of one percent of the budget?  I didn't think so.  BMW didn't get to be BMW by scrimping on parts.  Right?

3.  So one of our biggest challenges when we're starting out is not to confuse the amount of money in our own pockets (meager though it may be) with the amount of money other people have to play with.  You have to come into the game knowing that people have money to spend and they are going to spend it with someone.  Rarely in the this world do things other than commodities get chosen by consumers based solely on price.  And if your work looks exactly like everyone else's then you've got a vision problem and not primarily a business problem.  Just because you're broke doesn't mean clients are broke and "need a deal".  You need to price your usages based on the value of the intended use.

4.  We talked for a while about how to find your cost of doing business.  What does it cost you to be you and to keep the doors opens and the lights on and your bills paid?  How will that affect things like the rate you'll charge for doing work?  How do you figure that out?  This was by way of review since they were required to read the book.

5.  At some point we moved on and I introduced the curve of efficient money generation as predicated by time in the market and the "aging asset"; meaning "you".  My curve goes up from 20 to 30 or so years old, hangs in a straight line till 55 and then begins to descend again.  The curve is an indication of the money you can expect to earn from commercial photography assignments.  The first part of the curve is the ascendency you experience as you learn to business more and more efficiently and as you make more and more friends in your age range in the business.  Things hum along (barring economic catastrophes) pretty well for about 20 years and then, in your 50's you begin to experience your art director and art buyer friends moving on and retiring or taking teaching positions or being moved up into management, where they are not responsible for hiring creative talent.  You also lose cool as you age and it is a business of implied coolness.

The take away is that you better start saving now so that you can deal with the declining income from this part of your business as the Kirkian Curve comes home to roost at your studio.   That means generating good income in the "hot" years and investing it in something other than your business.  It might also mean diversifying into other products, services and market sectors.

6.  #5 brought up #6 which is "handling your money" and saving intelligently.  I introduced them to the concept of "opportunity costs" with a real story from my checkered past.  In the mid 1990's my business was going crazy.  Dot com clients were tripping over themselves to spend money.  And in a fit of ego and business stupidity I bought a five series BMW automobile.  A quick tally on a napkin revealed that the total cost to buy, maintain and own that car for five years was nearly $100,000.  That's money that was just flat gone.  Back then Apple Computer stock was trading for $12 per share and all my friends were buying it.  Hey, we're all artists and we drank the Kool-Aid and we were sure of the second coming of Apple.  I couldn't buy the stock in any quantity because I lost my financial opportunity by putting my money into the depreciating asset of a car.  I missed the "inverse bubble" of Apple.  If I'd put the same $100,000 in Apple stock at $12 per share I would have made some $24 million dollars at this point in time.  I lost that opportunity because I spent the money on something else.  I'm still kicking myself.  But it's certainly something to remember when you are considering big purchases, like cars and houses and studios.  Opportunity cost is real and it is part of your business decision making every day.

7.  Someone asked how a "broke college student" could put together the capital to get started today.  The implication being that no one has any money.  I asked for a show of hands.  "Who has cable service?" "Who has an iPhone with an unlimited data package?"  "How much do you spend at happy hours and how often?"  And on and on.  All hands went up for most of the questions and we went back to the whiteboard so people could see that all those purchases add up to significant dollars and none of them are necessary expenses.  My question to them:  "Why are you wasting time watching TV if you've got a business you are trying to get off the ground.

8.  The we talked about your best friend and your worst enemy and the fact that they are one and the same.  That entity is:  Compound interest.  If you owe money you're getting beat up by compound interest every minute of the day.  If you have money and you invest it your money makes money even as you sleep.

9.  We talked about the quality of photography.  There are more great photographers "out there" than ever before.  That's the consensus.  My point to them was that there might be hundreds of people in my market who are better at using the cameras, at visualizing, at making pictures.  I am not afraid of better photographers.  I am afraid of better marketers.  Marketing is the key to just about every business.  Only monopolies can get away with doing mediocre marketing.  You can't afford not to do it right.

10.  When we talked about marketing I was very frank about two things:  One.  This is a numbers game. The prizes go to the people who have crafted a compelling message, understand their unique selling proposition, target the right audience and finally, who deliver the message to the target.  Two.  The paradigm of good marketing hasn't changed because of the web.  You can't expect to reach very many people any more with e-mail (free) marketing because millions of photographers have simultaneously spammed the e-mail accounts of the handful of art buyers and other ad agency clients.  What cuts thru?  Alway moving from a new direction.  Right now direct mail is hot.  But that will get saturated and you'll need to move on to something else in order to avoid the crowds and get through the filter of mail box grid lock.  But each iteration will get you clients.  At some point, when there are hundreds of thousands of online sourcebooks beleaguered clients may turn back to one or two printed source books.  I can't predict the specific future but I learned from the movie The Incredibles,  when everybody is special no one is.....

That's why it was a really smart move when the first person showed his portfolio on an iPad.  Now, only a few months later, it's already old hat.

I answered a bunch of questions and talked about how my career started.  I reminisced about my first show and how I spent my last $13 on jug wine.  Thank goodness someone called me and took a chance a day or two after the opening reception.......some times you have to take risks.  But nearly always you have to know what it cost you to be in business and who your potential clients are.  And always you have to know what your unique value proposition is.

This pretty much sums up the two hours or so that I spent with Bill's students.  Bill does a great job teaching them the realities of the market and which tools they need to survive and thrive.  They were a bright bunch and I don't think they have any delusions about the business.  But there's good reason to be optimistic.  The future is unknowable.  You step to the edge of the pool, hold your breath and dive in.  The water may be just right for you...