Saturday, May 26, 2012

Shooting casually with my favorite normal lens..

Note:  I don't own an OM-D.  But I do own a 25mm Summilux 1.4 and I love it.

If you are shooting micro four thirds, and you have a preference for "normal" focal lengths you'll find this lens to be an absolute treasure.  After I shot with this lens I gleefully sold my Panasonic 20mm 1.7 to a friend and haven't had even a glimmer of remorse.  The images below 
are from a casual afternoon out and around with the 25mm Panasonic/Leica 1.4 Summilux attached to the front of a Panasonic G3.  Set (as the Photo Gods intended) to shoot in a square format....  I think the images are also a testament to the G3.  Which is adorable.












Friday, May 25, 2012

Everyone's hyperventilating about the Olympus 75mm 1.8 but me. I've got something even better.....

This image was taken with a priceless and rare Olympus Pen 60mm 1.5 lens.  @f 2.0.  I've blown it up from the original file and taken a good look.  Even close to wide open it gives the best Canon and Nikon lenses a run for their money and it's over forty years old.  Don't tell me Olympus can't make lenses.  Watch out Leica.


I needed an image of my Hasselblad to go with a column I wrote for theOnlinePhotographer.  I could choose from Nikon macro lenses on Kodak full frame bodies, Sony macros on 24 megapixel bodies and 120mm Makro Planars on Hasselblad bodies but I decided to use the right tool for the job and make the image with my Olympus Pen 60mm 1.5 lens on my Panasonic GH2 body.  The file is immaculate. Couldn't do better with anything else.  The background was filled with barbed wire and op art and all kinds of nasty detail but look at that depth of field control...  Okay, the wall in the background is painted gray but it does have some imperfections that aren't showing up because of the DOF.

You can't find the 60mm's anymore.  I'd gladly sell mine for $5,000 if you really need one.  But the 75mm  1.5 is probably just as good.  And a lot cheaper than combing through the collector market.

Part of getting really good lenses at good prices is being able to see the future.  I bought mine in 1982.

My advice today?  Run out and buy some film Hasselblad stuff. Get mint condition stuff.  Not to shoot (you could if you felt moved to...) but to collect.  They're not making it anymore and it really was the soul of film photography...

Thanks for reading.  No ads today.

Bill Beebe sent me this link: http://thetrichordist.wordpress.com/2012/04/15/meet-the-new-boss-worse-than-the-old-boss-full-post/

Read it and think about how artists are increasingly (not) compensated.  I don't want to get into a thing with anybody but it's an well argued POV.

Thanks, Bill.

El Naranjo Restaurant Website is up. Go take a look.

http://www.elnaranjo-restaurant.com/

A new restaurant.  I shot the food images and portraits for the website.



All shot with a Sony a77 camera and a 30mm f2.8 macro lens.


This is the restaurant I shot for last month.  Here's the blog post:


http://visualsciencelab.blogspot.com/2012/04/saturday-is-restaurant-day.html

Thursday, May 24, 2012

What I learned when I dragged a Hasselblad on vacation. The myth of perfection.

Rome.

It was 1991 and most of my assignments were being done on medium format film with one or another camera from Sweden.  There's a myth that floats around the web like a party guest who's drunk and won't leave, that all the pros back in the film days used 35mm cameras.  Well, I know the four or five hundred sports shooters did but the other 200,000 professionals mostly used medium format...except for the ones that used 4x5 inch film.  With the exception of documentary photographers and event photographers very few pros used much 35mm for real work until the late 1990's and, even then, would quickly scurry back to medium format, given a choice.

Anyway, the dollar was strong and Belinda and I decided to take a real vacation, not just a quick jaunt to the coast or a long weekend in San Francisco or New York.  A real vacation.  Two weeks or so and out of the country.  We headed to Italy.  I packed light.  I brought a Hasselblad 500 C/M with two lenses:  a 50mm f4.5 and a 100mm Planar f3.5.  I also brought along about 100 rolls of Kodak Tri-X (magic film).  The camera was rudimentary.  Just a waist level finder and a couple of 120mm film backs. No meter. No autofocus. No motors.  Just my eyes, my brain and as much cool industrial art as Hasselblad could cram into a body.  My back-up plan?  Buy another camera on site if this one failed.  But I was using Hasselblads in the studio, shooting 20 or 30 rolls a day for years and I hadn't had one fail on me yet...

So, what did I learn hauling that around?  Well, to start with I like medium focal length lenses and I could have just left the 50mm at home.  The 100 was about the equivilant of a 60-65 mm lens on a full frame, 35mm style camera and it always seemed just right.  I learned to judge exposure by using the little slip of paper that came packed from Kodak with each roll of film.  They had printed pictograms of the most common exposure situations and the accuracy was better that anything we get using a meter.

I learned, with 12 exposures on a roll to be discerning about what I shot.  I also learned to be patient.  If I shot too much too quickly I'd be out of film just about the time something really cool was happening.  I learned that old, waist level cameras were invisible and anonymous.  And I learned for the 10,000th time that the square beats the crap out of all other photographic formats.

When I got back home I learned that a big negative trumps all the technology in the world for image quality.  I learned that 120 mm film made contact sheets where each individual image was big enough to judge with the naked eye.


Belinda in Siena.


Belinda in Verona

And I've learned over the years that the pursuit of perfection in photography is great if you are trying to exactly replicate a box of laundry detergent or a stereo receiver for an advertising project but that perfection tends to suck the life out of images that are meant to be savored and enjoyed.  

I'm happy if something is in focus.  I'm happy if the image reminds me of an experience and I'm happiest when I can see the grain.  When I can see the grain I know it's art.

Finally, if you are shooting art for yourself you really only need one lens.  Not an all purpose lens but a lens you can believe in.  A lens that, when you look through it, makes everything look more exciting and more real.  A lens that matches the vision in your heart.  All the other lenses are bullshit.  They make them so professional photographers can do stuff the way clients want it.  Really.  If you don't get paid to do this stuff just narrow down and narrow down until you find a lens that makes your vision sing and then sell the rest.  You'll argue and you won't believe me but if you do it you'll be so much happier with your work five years from now.  Honestly.  It's the one thing I've learned chasing business and clients.  You compromise your vision.  One lens is all you need.  In fact more lenses just cloud everything up.

The best fashion shooter I ever met just had one lens.  It was a Hasselblad 150.  The front element looked as though someone had put a cigarette out on it.  She didn't own any other lens so she never had to think about which lens she would use or how she would work.  She just did her work and it was stellar.  No choices, just the right choice.  No confusion just vision.  Amazing.  But now we're all so fearful we feel like we need to have "all of our bases covered" even when we're just doing this for fun.  That's why it's not as much fun.  

Zooms are for sissies.  I have a collection. I'm just a sissy.  Show me the guy with one 50mm lens and no bag and I'll show you an artist.  Or at least a guy without a back problem.....

You won't listen anyway.  Go ahead and buy whatever you like.

Ahhh. The sweet smell of desire.


The shopping gene is irresistible. It's fun and entertaining. And it never stops. The image above was shot on the Via Condotti in Rome. Shopping central. In the spirit of a week spent doing commerce and making money I thought I'd go on a virtual shopping spree and also let you know what stuff I've already bought that I really liked.  Shall we?

So everyone has either ordered or already gotten their brand new, Olympus OM-D cameras and they are delighted.  But have you thought of an extremely cost effective back up body for those times when you want to sport two primes at a time????  You might want to consider the sturdy and reliable little EPL1.  You can pick them up right now on Amazon, brand new, for less than $150.  Why would you?  Have you ever wanted to take your camera somewhere......dangerous?  But you were reticent to do so because, well, it's an expensive tool?  Stick your kit lens on an EPL1 and go forth courageously.  The files are just as good as those that come squirting out of a current EP3.  And you can add the VF2 or VF3 finder for the ultimate in usability.  At $150 it's disposable cheap.  


But you may want something a bit more upscale and a bit more flexible as your cheap as free back up body to your new, gleaming masterpiece.  I strongly suggest snapping up one of my favorite cameras of all time:  The Olympus Pen EP2.  You can snag one right now, new with warranty, for only $269.  You get a second control dial and really nice styling on the body.  Of all the cameras I own it's got to be the most fluid and enjoyable to use.  I'm adding another one at this price because I think cameras like to hunt in pairs, I always like having more batteries and I'd love to walk around and shoot with the 45mm on one body and the 25mm on the other.  VF-2's on both, please.

Included just for show.  Snap up a clean one if you can find one.  It will be the ultimate photo collector's item in five years, or so.....

The next thing on my list is an adapter to use different lenses on my micro four thirds cameras.  I already have an adapter that lets me use the older, Olympus Pen lenses on the bodies but lately I've been thinking about sticking Sony Alpha lenses on the front of the EP2.  I didn't think it would be possible since the Sony Alpha's have electronic aperture settings but apparently Fotodiox makes one.  It's right here.  So, for a whopping $39 I'll have access to even more lenses.  Most interested in plugging the 30mm macro onto the EP's and seeing how that works.  (I haven't tested this one yet so caveat emptor...).

Speaking of Sony Alpha's I've been thinking about the two extremes represented in the lens line.  At one end you have dirt cheap plastic lenses that have great performance in a mediocre container and, at the other end you've got "no holds barred" performance in great tubes of alluring metal and white paint.  Here's my favorite cheapster:  The Sony 35mm 1.8 dirt cheap lens.  $219.  This is my "normal" lens for the APS-C Sony bodies.  It's extremely light weight and very nicely sharp at nearly all of the aperture settings I'm interested in.  If I break it or lose it I won't think it's the end of the world.   At the other extreme though sits my Sony 70-200mm f2.8 G lens.  And if I lost this one I'd be plenty pissed because it would cost me two thousand dollars to replace it.  But it does what I bought it for:  It's fast, it's sharp and clients get all woozy when I pull it out of the bag.  It actually gets about 10% of the use I get from the 35 but when I do need it (for swim meets, cross country meets and fancy portraiture) I'm glad I bought one of the best.

Circling back to cameras for just a minute.  I live in fear of being somewhere far from the studio and being caught with a dead battery in my camera.  But every time I head to the camera store to buy spares I'm stunned by the prices that Olympus and Sony (and Nikon and Canon) want for their camera batteries.  In desperation I tried some no name batteries I found on Amazon in my EP2 and EP3 and I was pleasantly surprised.  The brand I've been buying is called, Maximal Power, and, at $10 a wack they are wonderful.  No failures in two years....

As you know, I've written some books about lighting.  I try to be neutral and stick to the facts and that works well in a book about, say, LEDs.  I'm loving the LED Lighting for Digital Photographers because it's the first book about LED light for photographers in the entire book industry.  I actually have a MONOPOLY!!!!!!! Yeah for me.  If you haven't bought a copy yet please follow the link and at least read some of the reviews. You might not realize how badly you actually need this book. Almost as badly as I need you to buy it..... (kidding, of course.)

But if you poked me, or watched me work, you'd realize that my real love in lighting is the use of big, soft sources.  I've used Photek Softlighters for years but I've been on the look out for something bigger (72 inches) and sturdier (thick, fiberglass rods instead of crimp-able metal rods) and just as cost effective.  I've finally found my ultimate umbrella system.  It's from Fotodiox and it's a 72 inch umbrella with a white (or silver, if you need a bit more contrast) interior, a black backing to control spill, and (super bonus) a white diffusion cover to make it the ultimate umbrella/softbox combination.  I bought one and I'm thrilled with it.  Well made and, when used well, soft but directional.  It may be the perfect Kirk Tuck Lighting Modifier (KTLM).  I have the product bookmarked and I need to go back and get two more as back up.  When I find something I really like I want to get a few more in case the product changes or the distributor gives up....

Also available in Silver....  You'll probably want to use this one with a nice monolight or flash head instead of an LED....

If you are overwhelmed with technical product and lighting tools I can change course here for second and recommend a book.  It's by superstar photo documentarian, SebastiÃ¥o Salgado, and it's a decade long photographic study of Work in the industrial Age.  It's an amazing book.  If you are into photo journalism and black and white photography you'll be delighted by the work of a master in both...

Finally, after having worked with my favorite tripod for a year I can whole heartedly recommend it for just about everyone.  It's handmade in Germany.  It's constructed of wood and metal.  It doesn't absorb heat or transfer vibration and chicks really dig the organic nature of it.  It's the Berlebach tripod.  You'll need to buy a tripod head separately.  That's your call.  Just don't put a cheap tripod head on a work of art.....  There are bigger and techier tripods out there but none with more useful personality.  An older post on the Berlebach's: http://visualsciencelab.blogspot.com/2010/07/tripods-love-em-or-hate-em-sometimes.html

I'm heading out to lunch with a new dining companion.  My dog.  She and I are going to P.Terry's for burgers.  She'll love the adventure and she never minds when I sit there and talk to her about camera gear.  In fact, I think she likes it.  She's always sniffing around the rangefinders.....



Wednesday, May 23, 2012

Reminiscing about my first book. Years and years ago.



I had been shooting little editorial jobs for Texas Monthly Magazine for a couple of years when I got a call from a person named Cathy Casey Hale who was working in their book publishing company.  It was around 1983.  Texas Monthly Press was doing a book on Mexican food and they needed a photographer to illustrate some of the food on various locations around Texas.  Would I be interested?  Flash a book deal in front of a relatively new photographer and I guarantee you'll get a quick, "Yes!!!!"

The book's author, Anne Lindsay Greer, was a big deal in the food community in Dallas.  She consulted for a number of hotels and restaurants and she was amazingly well connected in the food industry. I was a struggling photographer with a small bag of older Canon cameras and three lenses.  I also owned a light meter, a small novatron flash system that coughed out about 200 watt seconds and a Vivitar 283 flash equipped with an optical slave.  That's it.  You just got the whole inventory.  No medium format camera.  We Polaroided with an old Polaroid camera that had one shutter speed and a fixed aperture.  You set the distance on the plastic lens by lining up the arrow with pictograms of mountains or a group of people or one person.  Then you prayed for good exposure.

Now, back then the industry generally used big cameras to shoot food but I explained to the editor that these cameras were all I had.  Several cool, New York food shooters were experimenting with 35mm cameras and food and I read everything I could find magazines and Time/Life books about shooting food with smaller cameras.  No web research existed back then....

The publisher was okay with the idea of shooting with 35mm as long as I used Kodachrome slide film.  We were doing images at ten restaurants around the state.  I bought 12 rolls of 36 exposure film so I'd have two rolls in reserve....for back-up.

One evening I got a fax of the agenda and I started packing. It didn't take long.  I didn't have much to pack.  Into the bag went a Canon F1 (original, with lots of mileage) and it's back-up camera, the weathered and tired FTB.  Both of them synced with flash at 1/60th of a second.  I put my entire collection of Canon lenses in the bag as well.  That would be:  a 24mm 2.8,  a 50mm Macro and a 135mm 2.8 (which never saw daylight on this project).  I packed the two Novatron plastic heads and the little gray metal box that powered them.  I judiciously added about five sync cords because they had high mortality rates and only trust-funder photographers and big studios had (primitive) radio slaves back then.  I had two 44 inch, shoot through umbrellas and two light stands.  The final bit of gear packing was my really battered, Leitz Tiltall tripod. 

All of this amazing camera bounty (all purchased used from Capitol Camera, which is long since gone) fit nicely into a weathered, canvas bag that a more established photographer had cast off in my direction.  All the lighting gear fit in one of the blue milk crates that restaurants use to hold milk that is delivered in plastic bags.  I also packed some Levi's with no holes and some clean shirts.  I didn't pack too much because all of our trips were conceived as "out and backs."  There was no budget for hotels or motels for the photographer.  

At the time I was driving a unique and highly collectible (ha. ha.) car, a 1969 Volkswagen bug.  It had never been graced with air conditioning and sometimes (randomly) the latch would fail on the driver's side door and, while executing an agressive right hand turn the centrifugal force would cause the door to swing open.  Since there was no trunk to speak of all the gear rested easily on the back seat.

Of course the book project occurred in the most auspicious month for Texas-based projects, August.

We shot in Austin, Houston,  and San Antonio but my most memorable day was the one in Dallas.

My first destination (the writer lived in Dallas and would never be caught dead in an un-air conditioned, ancient VW Beetle with a restless door...) was the citadel of snobbism in Dallas, the Mansion on Turtle Creek.  An elegant restaurant.  The kind that kids like me had read about in Texas Monthly Magazine while eating fifty cent tacos at the original Taco Cabaña on Hildebrand in San Antonio. (24 hour service and bar for the Trinity University students).

I pulled up out in front of the Hotel of the demigods and crawled out of my stuffy VW into the already sweltering heat of a humid August morning and started to unload my milk crate when the valet parking people came literally running to my car.  "Could I please park it around back in the employee parking lot?"  Aesthetic conflict.

I brought my meager gear in through the kitchen and met the food and beverage director.  My Greer and my editor would be late.  Would I care to have coffee in the lobby?  Yes.  I had a decent cup of coffee and a petit pain au chocolat (served on bone china with a superfluous doily) and pretended to be interested in the proffered Wall Street Journal.  When my party finally arrived the Hotel discreetly presented me with a bill for my repast.  $16 in 1983 for a cup of Columbia's finest and a smallish chocolate crescent roll.  There went most of my allocated food budget for the entire day....

Tortilla Soup at The Mansion on Turtle Creek.

The challenges were constant.  Imagine shooting ISO 25 film and trying to keep everything in focus while also doing an exposure for the interior with two underpowered flashes while also trying to keep the sunlight on the plants outside the window from burning out.  All with a camera with a max sync speed of 1/60th.  Somehow I pulled it off but at the time I had no real way of knowing if I'd been successful or not.  I would have to wait until I drove back to Austin, dropped my Kodachrome at the lab and waited while it made a round trip to a Kodak lab in some other state.  I know I lit the table from the the "11 o'clock" position while I stood at the six o'clock position because I can see the vague shadows from the condiment bowls.  I can see a second shadow from my offset fill light.  

I lived with the constant fear, back then, that nothing would come out when the film came back from the lab.  Or, that my meager bracket of exposures would have been misguided.

Later in the day we headed to the Loew's Anatole Hotel where we photographed the Mexican pizza and carmel ice creams that would be the cover shot.  I used my two Novatron heads into shoot through umbrellas for the food but it was even obvious to me that I'd have to light up the back wall to keep the rear of the room from plunging into darkness so the Vivitar 283 was pressed into service.  Not to sound like we walked uphill for miles in the snow to school but....we didn't have very good batteries back then.  No NiMh.  We had Ni-Cads and they were good for about 35 to 45 full power flashes in a 283.  So we used up a bunch of juice getting everything right.  We were going strictly by the meter so I fudged a lot on both sides of the indicated ambient and flash exposures.  Again, I would have no idea of what would finally turn out until days later...

When we wrapped our last restaurant in Dallas I loaded up the VW and headed, at rush hour, back to Austin.  And promptly got stuck on one of Dallas' satanic freeways.  In 105 degree heat.  Surrounded by giant Suburbans, each radiating their own heat profiles in 360 degrees.  I was sooo toasty.  But my big concern was for the film.  Heat and twitchy slide film are not a good combination.  The next day we headed to Fonda San Miguel and we photographed in their atrium. The light was gorgous.  I helped it along (or screwed it up a bit) with some of my own light, more for show than anything else.

Fonda San Miguel, Austin, Texas

Over the course of the project I had hotel bellboys holding king size sheets over tables of ice sculptures baking in the San Antonio sun desperately trying to get the light all balanced before the giant ice canaries became small ice slush.  We pulled that off by the skin of our teeth, surrounded by several dozen curious tourists, some of whom were eventually pressed into service holding another king size sheet up as a giant bounce fill....


We scrubbed decades of dirt off the wall of a restaurant in Houston just to make a reasonable shot and we got to El Mirador restaurant in San Antonio at 7:00 am on a Saturday morning so we'd have a fighting chance of getting enough soup to shoot before the rabid fans of the place descended from as far away as Aspen for a bowl of incredible stuff.

On the way back from Houston my fan belt disintegrated.  Can't drive a VW far without one.  I couldn't find an exact replacement but I found a bigger one that could be used in a figure eight configuration and still turn all the right stuff.  It was still on the car when I sold it months later.

Finally, nervously, I handed in two sheets of images.  Forty frames in all.  A few months later I had a small stack of cookbooks to show for my days of work.  That, and a check that would barely make a basic day rate today.  The book?  It did well.  The went through five editions and then the publishing company's assets got sold to Gulf Coast Publishing in some sort of high finance deal and they also printed editions of the book.  I did the whole project on a one time fee basis.  I learned so many lessons.  Royalties?  Good.  Nicads? Bad.  Cookbook authors? Kinda crazy.  Cash advance?  The very next time...  

You are probably laughing and thinking I should have waited until I was as equipped as a medium sized photo store before I took on a project like this but I would refer you to books or articles about a "failure to launch."  You have to jump in somewhere.  And if you don't have the balls to take a chance you probably aren't going to make it in this crazy business anyway.

Back then most of the photographers I knew were no where near as "gear obsessed" as everyone is today.  We got hired because they figured we were smart enough to figure it out.  And if we got stuck, we'd improvise.  Because we knew our basics.  We knew the theory.  We could make enormous light sources with a couple of white bedsheets and some interested bystanders.  We could also make it into an adventure.

Something happens when you come in with every contingency covered and all the details double nailed down.  The adrenaline goes right out of the mix.  There's something about fear and courage and craziness that makes a shoot or a project something a little special.  

Those were early days for me.  And boy, did I learn a lot.  Just thought I'd share one from the good ole days.

Thought about it as I went on location this morning with multi-deluxe cameras, many lenses and a bag full of monolights with another bag of "back up" monolights.  More gear, less magic.  Best lesson I've learned.  Now if I can just let go of the fear of failure and practice what my inner photographer already knows.......it's not about the gear.

It's all in the timing.

Nikon D2X.  Negative Edge Pool.