Curious to understand what makes a "style". I'm not sure I know. I know I like portraits that seem to connect with me. I'm less interesting in the technique than the context and less interested in the context than the content. I want to be interested by the implications of the captured moment.
More square. More time. More practice being with people.
5 comments:
I don't know that I can describe the "style" of the portrait you've posted here Kirk, but I love it. I see this and it makes me want to pick up my camera and make moving, emotional portraits like this one. Magical. If that's a style, that's what I'm after, too.
Much like you imply, I think style has a lot to do with what we take pictures of. What we like, what we are interested in. And then how we interpret them through our pictures.
You are fantastic at portraits because the people matter to you. Their stories. Me, dirt, leaves, farms, farmers, the natural environment and the story behind these things. In a dark, mostly B&W "style."
Photographers shine best when their "style" is applied to what's important to them.
Fantastic portrait, I think it really connects with what you are saying here. Wonderful and insightful.
Ah, my thoughts exactly! What square format was this, Kirk? It's beautifully 'film'.
More square. More time. More practice being with people.
Exactly my thoughts too. :)
Post a Comment
We Moderate Comments, Yours might not appear right after you hit return. Be patient; I'm usually pretty quick on getting comments up there. Try not to hit return again and again.... If you disagree with something I've written please do so civilly. Be nice or see your comments fly into the void. Anonymous posters are not given special privileges or dispensation. If technology alone requires you to be anonymous your comments will likely pass through moderation if you "sign" them. A new note: Don't tell me how to write or how to blog! I can't make you comment but I don't want to wade through spam!
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.