8.29.2015

Why do I keep those Olympus EM5.2 cameras around? Why do I like using them so much more than everything else I own?

Got the Bokeh, if you want it. 

I finished up all of my August work yesterday morning. There was the big PhotoShop project which called for me to convincingly make an executive (who we photographed in front of a green screen) look as though he was addressing a packed auditorium. There were the two portraits for two professional women who are re-entering the workplace after some years off and needed the right look for LinkedIn and other social media. There was the video footage that needed to be post produced for the company providing speaker and spokesperson training. By the end of the day everything had been delivered, approved and billed. Time to take a long neglected walk through downtown Austin. But first the task of selecting a camera and lens(es) to make the walk fun and interesting....

I stood up from the desk and walked to the equipment cabinet which is really a professional grade, Craftsman rolling tool chest (five ample drawers; lockable) and peeked into the bottom two drawers. If you read the blog on a regular basis you probably know that I have relentlessly downsized on camera inventory and also lighting inventory. In fact, I own fewer digital cameras now than at any time in the past fifteen years. Something I still find scary and
amazing....

I have exactly four cameras. Three if you are just counting camera models. I own a big, wonderful, competent, Nikon D810 which is an amazing work camera; if you want "Shock and Awe" files and an enormous amount of file safety margin. If you are working at the lower ISOs, which I usually do, you can realistically underexpose the files by two full stops and then recover them in post processing with very little, if any, visual degradation. In the same system I own a D750 mostly as a back up to the D810. It is smaller and lighter and the files aren't so gigantic and unwieldy so it makes a better "carry everywhere" sort of camera but it still screams, "WORK CAMERA" to me and while it's a competent picture taker it's not particularly charming or endearing to shoot with. Put a fast lens on the front and you're right smack in the middle of an ergonomic neutral zone. Or, in high heat, a fun depletion system.

I told the Nikon cameras that we'd shoot again soon, when we have our next paying job probably. Then I shut the drawer and moved up to the next drawer. There they were, the two Olympus EM5.2 cameras; one black and one silver. Each with a petite battery grip on the bottom to make handling more comfortable, more sure. The grip also means I get an extra battery so I don't have to fill up my pockets with little rectangles of lithium and other magic chemicals. 

I've been in a Sigma mood lately and I waffled for a few minutes about putting the 30mm Sigma f2.8 on one body and the 60mm f2.8 on the other. I'd add in the Olympus 17mm f1.8 to cover the wide angle space. But as I sat there and listened to the clock of my leisure time count down I decided to chunk all the redundancy and options and instead go with one perfect street camera and one perfectly perfect lens.  I chose the black EM5.2 body and the old, gracious, 60mm f1.5 Pen FT lens, festooned with a polarizing filter and a metal lens hood. Nice and long. The lens delivers two things I like: a bit of compression and much control of depth of field for the smaller format.  I used to worry that the lens is less contrasty than the more modern optics (the 75mm f1.8 comes to mind) but now that Lightroom has the "DeHazing" control one swipe of a slider in post makes this old optic as snappy as anything out there. If you haven't tried the DeHazing control in the new edition of LR CC you're in for a nice surprise...

Once I parked the car and headed past Whole Foods and into downtown proper I quickly re-understood the power of choosing one camera and one favorite lens; my brain starts (almost immediately) to take the focal length into constant consideration and to start looking for images that are a good match. A half an hour into the exercise and my brain and feet agreed on just how far I had to be from various subjects to fill the frame the way I wanted to. No more looking through the finder and then backing up ten feet or coming forward five.

Having worked on very controlled images lately I was hungry to just explore and, recently, I've made a much greater effort to work against the light and even to embrace flare. And other thing I worked on, kind of an exercise, is to just focus on something in the foreground or the background and to let everything else collapse around it. That feels more like a poem than writing a descriptive paragraph. 

The lens, combined with focus peaking or one touch magnification (function button 2) makes the old, manual focus lens quick to handle and quick to acquire the sharp plane of focus I intended. 

I spent an hour and a half just walking and shooting before heading across downtown to join the staff of Zach Theatre in saying goodbye to my long time friend, collaborator, art director and theater mentor, Jim Reynolds. He's moving on after 25 years at the theater and we will all miss him very much. To my mind he was the glue that kept everything working...  It feels odd to have someone who has been so much a part of my orbit at the theater leave. I feel a little bit like I've been set adrift. We toasted him many times yesterday evening. He is one of the most brilliant marketing people I have met in that he could leverage a meager budget into a blockbuster marketing success by sheer force of will, experience and intelligence. Were it not for his art direction my portfolio over the years would have been much poorer.... 

After best wishes and a fun happy hour I trudged back to the car with the camera still firmly in hand an switched on. Nothing I shot during my walk is world class or even particularly riveting but this kind of thoughtful walk, with too many choices removed, is a great reset between photo work and photo play and one exercise I have been recommending for years.



I used the highlight/shadow control on the camera to open up the apparent dynamic range of the camera (in Jpeg SF) and started shooting images of tree branches in very shallow focus. I call this image urban tree with fast train in the background....

I am now, officially, a fan of flare.

























After having used the two Olympus cameras in the production of the Cantine video, and having mastered the Hi-Res mode pretty well, I have a new respect for these little cameras. I think people judge them on their sensor size or their overall size relative to price instead of realizing the value of their potential. I know that it all depends on what you shoot but my use of them is a lot like the way I used Leica rangefinder cameras back in the 1990's. We worked all day long with medium format and large format cameras and all of my personal work was done on a brace of M6 cameras (with different finder magnifications, matched to the focal lengths -- .58x, .72x, and .85x). While the slides were no match for the resolution of the bigger Hasselblad cameras the rangefinders were right at home on trains, in restaurants and on the street. 

Not everything needs to be done at the highest technical level and, in fact, when looking around the blogosphere it almost seems like the better that technical quality of a camera (more pixels, better DXO scores, bigger formats) the more boring the work from the people who slavishly use them. 

If you are an Henri Cartier-Bresson/Robert Frank/William Klein fan you'll probably already agree that you'd trade ultimate sharpness for immediacy and genuine-ness in your frames in a heartbeat. Eliminating one pursuit usually opens another. Ignore perfection for emotion? Careful working methods traded for the right visual feel at the right moment?

Pretty remarkable cameras. And not very showy...

shopping note: Click through any of the links below and once you arrive at Amazon.com any purchase you make will support the VSL site through small, affiliate payments to VSL. You don't pay more for what you buy and we get to use some of Amazon's money to make more content here. Win-win? Yes!







10 comments:

Rev. Heng Sure said...

Reading this story I am aware that your enjoyment of making pictures has survived your vocation; the visual fire is still burning and further the little Olympus rockets get out of your way. They vanish, and enable you to share what you see. Useful tools!

Don Karner said...

A wonderfully well written post. I must admit I have often envied you not only for your skill and artistry, but also for the city you get to walk through!

Unknown said...

I find it interesting that the EM5.2's play a similar role now to the Leica's you used to use for personal work before digital. My two systems are OMD based and Leica based. I had though they were completely different, but I didn't realize that I may be subconsciously using them to achieve similar objectives in different ways. You made me think. Dang! I hate it when that happens!

Gilly said...

Always enjoy your posts Kirk and as a long time 4/3 and micro 4/3 shooter I appreciate the small form factor and great image quality of the Em5 mk2. When I take it out with the grip attached and my favourite lens, the Voightlander 25mm 0.95, I feel like I'm walking in the shoes of Cartier-Bresson. This camera is a modern marvel and I'm just glad that I made the choice to purchase it.

Anonymous said...

Alternative title for this blog entry: "Less is more."

Henry said...

What you wrote reminds me of a Magnum photo exhibition I saw in 2013 at UT Austin when I was in town for awhile. It was called:

Radical Transformation: Magnum Photos into the Digital Age

http://www.hrc.utexas.edu/exhibitions/2013/magnum/

Excellent and the presentation was good too. The prints were of various sizes by many Magnum photographers. I am sure lots of the people on the internet would have hated almost every single photo though because even many of the smaller prints (5x7, 6x9) were not eye cutting sharp when viewed at 3 centimeters. :-) There would have been screaming and derision by the dogmatic extremists with their 10x loupes. Not sure about CA, distortion, and all the other things that so many people are obsessed with since I didn't even bother checking. They were wonderful viewed from a normal viewing distance. Very nice exhibition.

Probably about 90% of the photos in the exhibition were B&W. Some of the photos are famous iconic photos from Capa, Cartier-Bresson, et al that you have seen before.

Later I was walking around with my camera and I sort of wondered if all the photos in the exhibition had been taken with digital cameras if some of them, maybe a bunch of them, would have been deleted in the camera? I imagine these photographers are smart enough to not be over concerned (concerned, of course, but not over concerned) with all the technical details and let those things override what the image looks like and whether it is interesting. Fortunately, the photos had not been deleted.

Most of the photos in the exhibition could have easily been taken with my Canon G16 digicam with the Sony BSI 12mp 1/1.7" sensor and 28-140mm f1.8-2.8 lens. And the technical quality in many cases would have been even better. Just being able to quickly change ISO or use Auto ISO is a huge advantage. Shooting raw there is good ISO from 80 on up to, oh I don't know, 3200. Even 12,800 is usable and quite good compared to just slightly fast film from a long time ago (if shooting in raw). A long time ago ISO 400 film was fast.

I sure enjoy using my Olympus E-M5 and E-M10 a lot too and sometimes just put a simple lens on it while walking around here in Japan. Usually the Olympus 25mm f1.8 or 45mm f1.8 or Panasonic 20mm f1.7. Small, solid package and fun to shoot with.

Anonymous said...

Nice shots, I particularly like the bikerack and chimney photos. The colours are striking.

And yep, the kit only needs to be able to fulfill your vision. The pro photographers I know are the least interested in kit. One is doing his latest project on medium format and iPhone. It'll get his ideas on record and the two formats will hang side by side in galleries when done.
Mark

Ken said...

I agree that the camera either draws out one's creativity or creative people are drawn to the camera. Every now and again on 500px.com I will search on particular camera models and see what pops up in the results. Simply typing EM5 into the search bar is guaranteed to display the most consistently and creatively interesting photos.

Dan Fogel said...

Nice post and glad you are still walking around with the Olympus cameras. I have been using the E-PM2 with the Olympus 17mm f1.8 as a walking around camera and am sort of smitten with using the touchscreen for focus and shutter - dirty diaper, I know, but it's great for from the hip type street shots. Do you know if the Mark II OM-D M10 has the same focus peaking you describe? I sort of like that camera's specs (the electronic/silent shutter comes to mind) and the price for just knocking around.

Anonymous said...

I have focus peaking on my original OM-D E-M10, but I wind up using the magnification for manual focusing more. I'm not sure that it's the exact same process, but for mine, the peaking color is white, which isn't ideal. I'd rather have a hot pink or some other unnatural color.

Post a Comment

We Moderate Comments, Yours might not appear right after you hit return. Be patient; I'm usually pretty quick on getting comments up there. Try not to hit return again and again.... If you disagree with something I've written please do so civilly. Be nice or see your comments fly into the void. Anonymous posters are not given special privileges or dispensation. If technology alone requires you to be anonymous your comments will likely pass through moderation if you "sign" them. A new note: Don't tell me how to write or how to blog! I can't make you comment but I don't want to wade through spam!

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.