Ben at Thundercloud Subs.
Just another update on my dalliance with the Fujifilm XF camera system here. I previously purchased two of the compact and virtuous f2.0 prime lenses from Fuji; the 50mm and the 35mm. I used them both and found the center sharpness to be wonderful and the overall look to be very pleasing. If there's a downside to the lenses the camera's lens profiling capabilities make it invisible to me. In fact, I liked them so much I decided to pick up their matching sibling, the 23mm f2.0. All three are small and light, have high center of frame sharpness and, by going a couple stops down you can even have sharp corners ---- if you really want them.
I got the 23mm during a period when I was totally engaged in a long photography project, shooting portraits, and relied exclusively during that period on longer lenses and zooms. You'd think I would have pulled the 23mm out of the bag and used it on some of the locations, just to see how well it worked, but you would be wrong. My recent schedules have been so tight that my choice would have been to screw around with the new lens and miss my next flight or keep the lens in the bag and make the schedule work for my client.
But over the last weekend and in small chunks of time this week I've been able to bring the lens along (riding on an X-E3 body) and give it a few tries.
The top photo is handheld (which means there's no image stabilization anywhere - in camera or on tripod) and shot at f2.0. I used the Acros color (B&W) profile and I see what all those Fuji fans mean when they say, "You gotta try it." It's probably the best black and white processing I've seen from a camera since.....wait for it.....Tri-X film in my Leica M6. After shooting a bunch of frames with the Acros B&W setting I'm coming to look at the X-E3, with the trio of compact primes, to be my digital Leica substitute. We'll see how that goes.
But I'm also interested in how the lenses perform when used on middle ranged and distant subjects and so I took the lens out for a walk on Monday, when we had clear skies, and shot some of my usual subject matter. It's convenient though boring to see the same bridge and buildings show up again and again in the posts but having them in multiple tests and posts means I can switch back and forth between posts to see how different cameras and lenses handle the same basic subject matter.
These were shot at f4.0 or 5.6 so I expected them to be sharp and they certainly were. If you need flat field lenses with high sharpness across the frame and no vignetting then these are not the lenses you are looking for... but if you understand how lens design and sharpness work and like the character and contrast of a good, all purpose lens then you might enjoy these. I'm beginning to think the mania for "flat field" lenses is a result of declining enrollment in college humanities programs; that failing is making our culture into a society made up solely of linear thinkers who value absolutes and technically measurable specifications above less tangible (and more lovable) qualities. Soon we'll all be programmers and engineers and society will die off from the ensuing sheer boredom.
At any rate I think Fuiji made (at least) three lenses that have a solid reason for existence in the bags of independent photographers and provide me personally with many reasons to appreciate them. I'll keep them.
The 23mm is the same angle of view on APS-C as a 35mm lens on a full frame camera. Not always my preferred focal length but when I feel like going wide it's a perfect starting point.
These Fuji lenses are currently on sale. I got mine for $50 less than it would have been the week before. It makes a nice stocking stuffer...
5 comments:
Kirk, i recently moved from Leica to the Fuji's and I agree with so many points you have made in recent weeks. I am now working with Xpro-2 and 2 XT-2s, as well as the GFX 50s. I am loving the lenses. On the APC side, I have found the 16/1.4, 23/2, and 35/2 to be wonderful. I also indulged with the 18/2 and the 27/2.8 (the later is part of my everyday camera/lens combo that is always with me). All perform well, with the 18/2 being relatively slow to focus and not as smooth operating as the 16/1.4, 23/2 and 35/2. On the GFX I am loving the 45/2.8 and the 63/2.8, I especially like being able to switch from 3:2 aspect ratio to the 24:65 ratio (like an xpan) and still have big files. Why I switched is a long story, but touches on issues such as getting older and liking AF, ... .
And, kudos to you for a wonderful blog.
David
Oi, the engineers and programmers also give you that not-so rectilinear, less corrected look on the world; It's the marketeers who want to sell more glass, more sensor, more megapickles to the masses (who didn't attend those humanities college programs either). Three "Hail Walter Mandler"s for you!
And on m43 you can still grab a Pana 14mm f/2.8 for a similar experience.
Kirk, I'm not sure how to thank you for your generous spirit, kind heart, and consistent love letters to our beloved Austin, TX. I'm a Florida boy, but I grew up going to Austin and the Texas hill country every summer since I was a kid as we visited with my extended family near Marble Falls. I've always loved Thundercloud, their secret sauce, and the paper thin slices of red onion they grace their subs with. There's some magic in all that negative space between those savory slivers!
Seeing your son Ben enjoying Thundercloud reminds me of of a summer I spent living with my Aunt and Uncle working for a home builder in Austin. Thundercloud was a weekly ritual. I don't comment all that much here, but your blog is a sacred space for me as I deeply admire both your narrative and visual storytelling and the vicarious views I glean into my alternative hometown. I bought access to one of your Craftsy online courses a few years back and it only reinforced my opinions regarding your talent as both artist and mentor (and kindred spirit). Thanks for sheltering and spreading the light in this corner of the web. Happy holidays to you, Belinda, and Ben!
Just out of curiosity, with your three primes on a walking trip around town, which lens get the most love and which gets the least?
Hey, Real Engineers design products fit for purpose. If the purpose is a linear field lens, that’s what you get. If the purpose is great bokeh, that’s what you get. Real Engineers realize that perfection is only relative to the requirements of the thing being engineered.
Also, some of the best musicians I know are engineers, and some of the best engineers I know started as musicians. As a decent engineer, I find that creating a piece of music or a photograph requires the same sense of creativity as a good product.
Post a Comment
We Moderate Comments, Yours might not appear right after you hit return. Be patient; I'm usually pretty quick on getting comments up there. Try not to hit return again and again.... If you disagree with something I've written please do so civilly. Be nice or see your comments fly into the void. Anonymous posters are not given special privileges or dispensation. If technology alone requires you to be anonymous your comments will likely pass through moderation if you "sign" them. A new note: Don't tell me how to write or how to blog! I can't make you comment but I don't want to wade through spam!
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.