9.11.2023

In keeping with the laissez faire attitude for today I overcame inertia and made an important life decision.

 I've been buying various M mount lenses for a while. This year I've acquired three that I like. The Carl Zeiss 28mm f2.8, the Carl Zeiss 35mm f2.0, and the Voigtlander 50mm App-Lanthar. They join the Voigtlander 40mm f1.4 lens I bought last year. And used extensively in Vancouver.

I've been using these lenses from time to time on the L mount cameras (SL, SL2, Sigma fp, and Panasonic S5) with various adapters, including a very pricey M to L adapter from Leica. They mostly work well but some of the cheaper adapters (non-Leica) allow lenses to focus past infinity. They mostly work for taking photos but you lose some of the close focus ability of each lens on those "lesser" adapters.

Even though I've been accumulating these M lenses I have been resisting the lure of the M series digital cameras. I was put off by their sheer cost, the need for yet another battery type, and my memory from a decade of shooting with M series film cameras. Seemed back then that rangefinders (the actual mechanics of optical rangefinder triangulation for focusing) had to be handled with kid gloves or they would go out of adjustment and make trying to focus via the rangefinder patches a fool's errand. 

But the other day I was looking at lenses on the Leica Store Miami website and for some bad and unknowable reason I decided to take a quick (and hopefully uninterested) glance at used Leica M rangefinder digital cameras. You know, just to see. 

And there it was. A Leica digital M camera I'd been interested in since its launch in 2012.  The M240.




This one is a black enamel paint model which means that under the finish the top and bottom plates of the camera are brass instead of aluminum. Just as Leicas had been through nearly all of the film days. The brass is heavier and, when you begin to wear off the paint, because you love handling the camera so much you can't imagine ever letting it out of your hands --- the edging shows the warm brass underneath instead of a lifeless, dull, neutral metal. 

The camera in question was little used and is nearly perfectly mint. It comes with a thumb grip and an extra battery. This particular model introduced Leica's 24 megapixel CMOS sensors. It was the first of the M series to feature live view and video capabilities. And it's a very capable photography tool. 

I've had this one in and out of my "shopping cart" at Leica Store Miami maybe five times over the last week. Always hesitant to push the "buy" button. 

Ben was over for dinner last night. I told him about the camera. He is immune to the charms of cameras; even to the charms of Leicas. But he knows his father well. 

After I told him all the cool stuff about the camera he calmly suggested, "Just buy it." My friend Paul had suggested I buy it as well. I thought I was doing such a good job resisting. I asked my spouse with the misguided idea that she would rein in my camera avarice. She just said, "If you want it buy it. Why not?"

Do I have no support network left? No one to restrain my wildest inclinations? No one to help set limits?

Ben shrugged, "Cheaper than an Aston Martin." B. added, "Cheaper than the new fence." Both added, "It's billing for a one day shoot...."

The salesperson on the phone finished me off by casually stating, "You can never have too many Leicas." 

Of course I pulled out a credit card and ordered in on the spot. It'll be here in the next few days. I'm worried it might be a "gateway" drug to a black paint M11. But... would that be such a bad thing?

Besides, I've read that no one actually uses ILC cameras any more. It's all done with phones. The cameras are just for decoration. Especially Leica rangefinders. Purely ornamental.

I just re-read this. It's wonderful to actually read something about a real camera. Especially a really cool camera. 

Just a reminder..... we are not sponsored by any camera maker, lens maker, photo retailer or, in fact, anyone. I guess that makes me self sponsored. All cameras and lenses written about here are purchased with my own funds. No one will go hungry in my extended family because I bought another camera. My imminent retirement is not in peril. No hard choices will need to be made. No begging for patronage will ensue. What a relief. 


26 comments:

  1. Planning on taking this one + three lenses and the q2 to Montreal at the end of the month. If the camera and batteries test out well. A throw back to the way I shot all the time in the 1990s.

    ReplyDelete
  2. And... much less expensive than a girlfriend!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Not sure which sounds more exciting - a new camera or the trip to Montreal. Enjoy both! And I am glad you re-posted those earlier posts you had removed - I hadn't even had a chance to look at them (and probably won't for a couple of more days).
    Ken

    ReplyDelete
  4. Although spoiled by EVFs and magnified view, I got my Hexar M out not long ago and was reminded how bright the OVF was and how readily the focus was achieved, especially when not using a lens at a setting with tiny depth of field. Good for you, it will be interesting to see how your experience goes.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Ed, the fun thing is that with an M240 you can cheat and use an EVF in the hotshoe. Even the less expensive VF from Olympus. Then you get an EVF on an M camera. Fun, Fun.

    ReplyDelete
  6. You know, i've thought a fair bit as to what new camera you were going to get as a back up to your Q. I thought it was going to be a RX 10 IV. Shows you how good my prediction ability is.

    Jay

    ReplyDelete
  7. Kirk…that would definitely be cheating and not a 1990s experience. Just say no.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Congrats on the new camera. Last year the SL has some crazy rebates so I convinced myself that I would get one and just use M glass I already had…then I found a deal on an M10r….then one of the local dealers had a demo M11 for $2k off MSRP…..as much as I really liked the SL the M is just something special…just wish I had gone straight to the M11. Being able to use live view or an evf in the studio and then just use the rangefinder out and about is pretty darn great. As a long time Canon and then Fuji shooter the Leica really has brought some joy back into photography for me. Hope you love it as much as I love mine.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Time to enjoy using hard learned skills instead of just trying to second guess
    artificial intelligence.
    You have the skills to enjoy the experience and master the instrument.

    Cheers Pierre

    ReplyDelete
  10. The first time I read anything of yours was your M6 review, so this is no surprise at all, just coming full circle.
    I have an SL and Q (and M6 and M4-p) but mainly use my M240 black paint for walking around stuff, it is wonderful as long as you don't go over iso3200 and I love the black and white it produces. My only worry for you is the fact you wear glasses. I can hardly see the 28mm frame lines without glasses and much prefer to use it with 35mm and 50mm, which for me the viewfinder is perfect. I will be intrigued to see how you get on with the viewfinder with glasses.
    Ignore the idiots who slag off the evf, it's the same one you used on your olympus pen and it might not match the SL but it does the job, I use it for 15mm and 21mm lenses. Enjoy
    All the best, Mark

    ReplyDelete
  11. Great to see you back on M cameras !
    This, a 50mm lens and Q2 should be a great combo ! Thanks again for your blog.

    ReplyDelete
  12. As someone who has never used a Leica M camera, I must humbly ask why you would go back to a rangefinder with its fiddly focusing, lack of TTL view, and lack of telephoto range. It could be nostalgia for an old (I'm not talking about age) Leica M user, and it could be the tradition of great photojournalists who used film M cameras. I suppose "Because I want it and can afford it" is a sufficient answer. That said, I've always heard that the reason to buy a Leica is "for the Leica glass." And yet all the lenses you mention are non-Leica. I would appreciate your thoughts on the common "for the glass" advice. Is there really some magic in Leica lenses? And all THAT said, I'm glad you are still writing about photography and cameras instead of various and sundry other topics.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Bonjour Kirk,
    Dans ton dernier rappel, précise aussi qu'aucun animal n'a été mal traité.

    ReplyDelete
  14. sound the alarm, the gf100II has landed, it called the II because it has 2 extra megapixels, fuji japans twitter mentions a 35mm 1.7 but uk dealers show a 55 1.7, tilt shift macro as well by the looks, whatever next

    ReplyDelete
  15. no, turns out この度弊社は、35mm判の約1.7倍となるラージフォーマットセンサーを搭載したミラーレスデジタルカメラ「GFXシリーズ」の最新モデルとして、「FUJIFILM GFX100 II」を発売いたします。
    https://fujifilm-x.com/ja-jp/products/cameras/gfx100-ii/

    means

    #gfx #gfx100ii
    Translated from Japanese by
    We are pleased to announce the release of the FUJIFILM GFX100 II, the latest model in the GFX series of mirrorless digital cameras equipped with a large format sensorapproximately 1.7 times larger than the 35mm sensor.

    ReplyDelete
  16. You buy and use what you can afford - but how it feels and makes you feel is most important.
    Enjoy.

    ReplyDelete
  17. jmarc,

    And no animals were discomforted, much less harmed!, in this undertaking.

    ReplyDelete
  18. and the g9 2 now, all systems go today

    ReplyDelete
  19. Currently on vacation at the beach. My camera is my M240 with the Voigtlander 35mm f2.5 and 50mm f1.1. I love manual focus and the M rangefinder just works beautifully for me. Enjoy!

    ReplyDelete
  20. I had a very similar experience. While on a family visit overseas I visited a Leica dealer just to get a look at a Q2. They happened to have a Q2 monochrom in stock. When I picked it up I knew it was for me but the price! I had decided to take a step back and not sell a kidney when my wife and daughter entered the store and asked if I was buying it. I tried to explain that the price was far too much but the wife commented that I wasn’t getting any younger. The Q2M and I have now bonded we travel everywhere together.

    ReplyDelete
  21. Congratulations, I guess. Somewhere, a banker is crying himself to sleep tonight. I tried Ms of both kinds (film and digital) and they just didn't do it for me, but I know a bunch of the best photographers in the world use them. I think they're best for people who like machinery, and I really don't, though I am a bit of an ergonomics freak. Along those lines, I see on micro-four-thirds websites that Panasonic will be announcing a G9 II, probably tomorrow. 25.2mp. You've said several time that you think that megapixeledge is a sweet spot in the megapixel lineup. If this camera actually is released, I'll be getting one. Okay, two.

    ReplyDelete
  22. Good on ya Kirk. You gotta look after yourself too. I still have an M4 and M5 in the cabinet. The 240 has always interested me too but I think a Panni S something will have to come first. The full frame DOF advantage for video is calling me ....

    Eric

    ReplyDelete
  23. JC, Those wealth managers can be bitchy. Especially the ones who are not into photography. But the purchase was fully approved my the VSL CFO. That would be....B.

    ReplyDelete
  24. Love you, Kirk. :)
    I said this as a comment on a different blog months ago, and it still stands.

    ReplyDelete

We Moderate Comments, Yours might not appear right after you hit return. Be patient; I'm usually pretty quick on getting comments up there. Try not to hit return again and again.... If you disagree with something I've written please do so civilly. Be nice or see your comments fly into the void. Anonymous posters are not given special privileges or dispensation. If technology alone requires you to be anonymous your comments will likely pass through moderation if you "sign" them. A new note: Don't tell me how to write or how to blog! I can't make you comment but I don't want to wade through spam!