The summary
To photograph freely throughout the United States, using the miniature camera exclusively. The making of a broad, voluminous picture record of things American, past and present. This project is essentially the visual study of a civilization and will include caption notes; but it is only partly documentary in nature: one of its aims is more artistic than the word documentary implies.
The full proposal
I am applying for a Fellowship with a very simple intention: I wish to continue, develop and widen the kind of work I already do, and have been doing for some ten years, and apply it to the American nation in general. I am submitting work that will be seen to be documentation—most broadly speaking. Work of this kind is, I believe, to be found carrying its own visual impact without much work explanation. The project I have in mind is one that will shape itself as it proceeds, and is essentially elastic. The material is there: the practice will be in the photographer’s hand, the vision in his mind. One says this with some embarrassment but one cannot do less than claim vision if one is to ask for consideration.
“The photographing of America” is a large order—read at all literally, the phrase would be an absurdity. What I have in mind, then, is observation and record of what one naturalized American finds to see in the United States that signifies the kind of civilization born here and spreading elsewhere. Incidentally, it is fair to assume that when an observant American travels abroad his eye will see freshly; and that the reverse may be true when a European eye looks at the United States. I speak of the things that are there, anywhere and everywhere—easily found, not easily selected and interpreted. A small catalog comes to the mind’s eye: a town at night, a parking lot, a supermarket, a highway, the man who owns three cars and the man who owns none, the farmer and his children, a new house and a warped clapboard house, the dictation of taste, the dream of grandeur, advertising, neon lights, the faces of the leaders and the faces of the followers, gas tanks and postoffices and backyards.
The uses of my project would be sociological, historical and aesthetic. My total production will be voluminous, as is usually the case when the photographer works with miniature film. I intend to classify and annotate my work on the spot, as I proceed. Ultimately the file I shall make should be deposited in a collection such as the one in the Library of Congress. A more immediate use I have in mind is both book and magazine publication.
Oh wait. That's an exact copy of Robert Frank's proposal for his Guggenheim grant which enabled him to spend time and effort on his seminal work, "The Americans." In it he's essentially saying he's going to drive around and see....What Catches His Eye. How strangely familiar.
And let's not get started on the wide net of subjects and scenes that Lee Friedlander cast. Or Garry Winogrand. There was never "the big idea" that held all their work together. They were out photographing to see what they could see and make photographs to share that particular gestalt.
On a different note. When People talk about cameras, and review cameras, my first demand is that they "show me." Don't tell me, show me. With that being written here is a one hour take of images that "caught my eye" this afternoon while I walked through South Congress Ave. in Austin, Texas on a cool January late afternoon. I'm showing "why I like this camera and this lens as much as I do." The photos are my review.
Studio car.
Nice Subaru in the last photo. If you need a reference letter in support of your application, I can supply one but it won't carry much weight. I enjoy those old lens names, Ultron, Planar, etc. They should give cameras cool names too.
ReplyDeleteRobert re: names of lenses, I think you are 100% right. The cameras need real names instead of meaningless model numbers. Maybe we can start a trend. I'm calling my SL2-S "Death Star" after the Star Wars movies... And wow! That Subaru is fantastic.... Dreamy even.
ReplyDeleteFormula 1 Subaru, intercooled turbo, dual exhaust, rear spoiler, multispeed transmission, step on the gas and get to that next photo session before the ink dries on the contract. That camera/lens is doing the job- incredibly. Nice "seeing".
ReplyDeleteI read that article. My take.
ReplyDelete'Back in the day' almost all photography was about what caught the photographer's eye. There is a book about the shift to idea-based photography, "Disappearing Witness: Change in Twentieth-Century American Photography" by Gretchen Garner. I am 'guilty' of photographing 'whatever catches my eye''. I even call myself a visual omnivore because I don't stick to a single subject matter. And I am 'guilty' of using AI to write artist statements because I find it torturous to write explanations of what I choose to show you by photographing it.
IMO Those notions of needing an big idea and then confining yourself to making images that illustrate an idea get in the way of experiencing life and nature. Going out with a camera and preconceptions of the result get in the way of connecting with reality. I go out for walks/hikes in the woods/drives and take my camera but the walk/hike/drive isn't the point nor is the camera. The point is to experience and relate to our world and the images we create are to share those experiences with others.
Is that 'art'? To me, it depends on our ability to communicate our reactions through our images, whether they are mundane or profound. Not every image will 'work' for every viewer. Just as we have to be receptive to what is around us the viewer has to be receptive to the image and we can't control that, big idea or no idea.
My Panasonic S5xII is Darth Vader. The force is strong with it.
ReplyDeleteMy Leica SL is Max, the nickname Leica gave it before introduction and the name of my late father.
ReplyDeleteAnsel Adams’ “Moonrise, Hernandez, New Mexico”, one of Adams’ most-celebrated photographs, was of a subject that literally caught his eye. The amount of dogma propagated in artistic circles is ridiculous.
ReplyDeleteAs for my next camera, should I name it Nicky? Too obvious?
Must... Come... to... Austin...
ReplyDelete(But before April.)