Indulge me. I re-read this and wanted to reprint it for the people who are new here. More original programming to come.

Why you shouldn't shoot like everyone else.

Let's face it,  I don't think any of us woke up one morning and said, “The thing I love best is taking pictures of strident brides putting on yet another cookie cutter,  antique ivory white dress with the annoying little buttons down the back.....”.  We didn't.  We don't.  We do many of the annoying little jobs we do because they pay the bills.  The wedding profits pay for the mortgage and the car payments.  The bridal portraits help pay for new gear.  And the PR photos of “guys in ties”, done with the same old soft box and grid light on the background,  pays for dinners and electric bills.  But you are way off base if you think we buy for a moment that you shoot these things because you are driven by your “inner muse” to do your “Art”.  (That's capital “A” art.....).

We're not all wired the same way so if you really get a thrill running a business and making a profit and that's all you want out of your photography then I get it and we'll give you a pass on the art thing.  But the rest of you aren't getting off so easily.  Most of us got into this field because we loved taking photographs of people, or landscapes, or life on the streets.  I certainly didn't pick up a camera because I saw a cool product photograph in a catalog.

I picked up a camera because I loved taking photographs of my friends.  I wasn't drawn to images that were lit in a particular way, I really loved the stuff that was black and white, available light and relatively unposed.  When I had done this kind of work for years as a pleasurable hobby I found my self at loose ends after my partners and I sold our advertising  agency.  I had some money in my pocket and a bunch of people kept hiring me to photograph them or their loved ones in the style I'd done.

But.....as soon as the art moved from hobby to business there started a subtle erosion of the essential point of view that made my work different from everybody else's.  I learned that there was an established style to shooting business head shots and so I learned that style and began to offer it.  I had to buy lights and drag them into the mix.  I learned the “right way” to do an executive portrait and I started to incorporate what I learned into the mix.  

And if you think about it, the convergence of digital imaging and the photo sharing sites on the web has quickened a process of homogenization that now seems relentless.  How many of you think that a reportage style of wedding photography is wonderfully unique?  Really?  Even though every wedding book I've seen in the past three months has exactly the same stuff in it?  The close up of the fingers trying to button five hundred annoying buttons on the back of an antique ivory wedding dress?  The edgey images with the razor thin slice of sharp focus that just screams out, “Hey, look at me.  I got a Canon 5D and a fast 85mm lens...”  You know the drill.  We all know the drill because we presume that these are the images and styles that brides want and we want to deliver them so we can make the car payments and buy dinner.  And in the corporate world we know that the standard head shot is generally a boring piece of crap that doesn't move the game forward any more than music on your website.

I think we homogenize for a variety of valid anthropological reasons.  We have a subconscious  desire to please our tribe.  We fear striving for originality and excellence because we have a suspicion that these things aren't valued by our clients and showing different work might cause them to reject our services.  Which we then interpret to be a rejection of our selves.  We might fear the hostility that will inevitably come from those who are practicing the status quo.

But here's the nasty reality statement that I'm sure you've known was coming from the minute you started reading this:  The people who populate the top 1% of the art world don't really give a minute of thought to what might “play well in Peoria”.  They pursue their vision.  Their own vision.  And they do it in a way that basically welds them into the longer view of art history or photo history because it introduces aesthetic game changers that the rest of us will buy into decades down the road and work to homogenize into our collective offerings while some where a new generation comes knocking with the real goods.  But we won't understand the value of those goods until it's just too damn late.  Think Richard Avedon and Irving Penn.  Both of whom were incredible pioneers as opposed to the Chase Jarvis and Michael Grecco types who understand a trendy, contemporary use of the tools, and the power of good, pervasive marketing.

It's like Avedon invented Haute Cuisine while Jarvis added an extra strip of bacon to the cheeseburger.....while Grecco introduced pink mayonnaise and convinced Ludacris to put it on his bacon cheeseburger.....really, it is apt.

Consider this for a moment...two companies sell 90% of the cameras used by professionals today.  Both have the identical format!  Your choice is really sensor A or sensor B.  Processing algorithm A or   Processing algorithm B.  Can you imagine the photographers we truly admire from the film age being constrained to choose between just two different films?  Where is the differentiation?  Where is the rugged individualism?  How did this all happen?

Some postulate that every move toward convenience decreases overall quality.  That every wave of mass acceptance creates an inertia to consider whatever the masses have embraced to be the “standard”.  By that measure, clothes from Walmart are the new standard, and if you are truthful you'll acknowledge that you'd never get your wardrobe from Walmart...

So, what do you do? If you are a business person, first analyze your business carefully, and if you find that selling your current product, no matter how commodified it is, is going well and your market share is growing, then continue on your path.  But if you feel like you got into this field to do something unique and different but you have the queasy feeling that you let the weight of life and money drag you into some compromised stasis then start pushing back and re-connect with why you wanted to be here in the first place.

When I taught at The University of Texas at Austin I had a student who came to me and complained that she couldn't possibly fulfill her promise as a great fashion photographer unless she had a Hasselblad and a stable of good, Zeiss lenses.  But she whined that she could never afford them, so she was doomed to failure.  A week earlier I had overheard her telling a classmate that her parents had just bought her brand new, turbo-charged  Volvo station wagon. ( in the early 1980's this would have been viewed as radically indulgent within the student class---now, who knows?).  

I suggested that she sell the car and buy the dream.  She thought I was insane.  The money trumped the art.  The comfort quotient kicked the crap out of art.  I caught up with her two decades of “life lessons” later.  She has become a gifted artist.  She pursues her vision with a Holga camera.  She lives on the edge.  She doesn't own a car.  But here's the news flash, she's happier than she ever was because she's very clear about what she wants.  And what she wants is to pursue the vision she had in the very first gestalt moment of loving photography.

So, how do you change?  How about throwing away all the trappings and offering what you really feel compelled to offer as art, and the hell with the rest of the market.  After all, would you rather be the next Avedon or a watered down/ tarted up version of Olan Mills.  You have the “Art” with a capital “A” in you or you would have never chosen this business.  Owning a McDonald's franchise is a much more secure way to earn lots more money.  So trade down on lifestyle, if necessary, and trade up on artistic integrity.  I can almost guarantee that you'll spend less on therapy and Xanax.  And people may grow up wanting to be just like you----instead of wanting to have your lifestyle.

I know you might think this sounds preachy and high handed but it's really a synopsis of the journey of self discovery I've been on lately.  I've opened the files in my office and dragged in a big ass trash can.  Anything that doesn't feel good, special and all about my work goes into the can.  All the event negatives from the 1990's.  All the executive portraits older than three years.  And I've started showing only the styles I want to shoot.  Not everything I could do in a pinch.  It makes me feel lighter.  Like I'm freeing up mindshare.  But that's something for another month.

In the meantime my prescription for change is to go back to using your very first camera for a month.  If you learned on a Canon AE-1 or a Minolta Maxxum 7000 or a Holga, go back and get one and load it up.  Shoot the way you once loved for a month.  Live with your style for a month and see if it doesn't feel better. 

I could give you more advice about shooting with little strobes but it would all be bullshit until you figure out why you shoot, and what you want to have coming out of your camera.  Customers?  If the work is satisfying to you then you'll find the market you want.  It may not be the market that supports your BMW payments but remember, you trade you life for money and you'll never get either back, so you might as well start doing it on your terms right now!

Thanks, Kirk

(really, two totally separate books with annoyingly similar titles.....)


MyVintageCameras said...

Thanks for the reprint. Sometimes I'll see someone elses photograph and wonder why I didn't take that photo when I was there. Then I remind myself that we all see the same world, but in different ways.

Craig said...

Great piece. Thanks for reprinting it.

kirk tuck said...

Thanks Craig. I saw it in the files and re-read it and laughed at my own insouciance...... I just felt compelled to re-share.

Daniel Fealko said...

I agree. Great piece.

If you happen upon any others like this in your files, please don't hesitate to re-post them.

Neil Gaudet said...

wow, thanks for the repost. Best post yet.

Anonymous said...

Greetings Kirk
A very good friend of mine sent me this file as a must read in capital letters. It's a very thought invoking article. The reason he send it to me is because I'm wrestling the same two head dragon that you talk about. I myself got caught up in the race of ho hum just PP it, it's good enough and move on to the next ho hum job. This isn't the way I started out 35 years ago. I built my reputation on my different style but like a lot of people got caught up in the money pit and after having a client tell me I needed a higher MP camera to keep the account I decide it was time for me to return to my roots and start shooting my style. I had another client make me and offer that was to good to refuse, but I had to shoot my old style that got me to where I'm at in the first place. You know I feel really good about being back where I started from, with the simple cameras and simple gear that got me here in the first place. Shooting my style, the things I love to shoot. I'm lucky I do not need the resources from these jobs any longer. I returned to a simpler life style that I had in my late 20's and have more than enough to go the distance. I just hope I can find my style and look I once had and the pleasure I got from the simple style. Nice read, it makes one think.

The Photophile said...

Damn! Everything I wanted to say but haven't because I have the writing skills of Mike Tyson. (Don't tell him I said that!)

I have been a member of a camera club here in South Africa for the last year and a half, and for the last few months I have been bugged by one thing, I know what "look" they want and either shoot or choose my entries for club evenings based on that (to get max points) rather than submit the stuff I really like. Just this week I decided not to submit pics at the club anymore, it's just a principle thing.

The same for the weddings and other stuff Ive done, it's all boring contrived crap.

Now the dilemma, how to go from here? I like the idea of collaborating with other photographers to inspire and help each other forward in our art, but that seems to stifle innovation. The club scene makes for clones rather than individuals. The commercial scene... well it's been said.

The idea that true artists are solitary, lone wolf types that thrive on suffering for arts sake is making more and more sense to me. But I also need to pay the bills in the mean time. Catch 22.

I think I need a rich patron! Any volunteers?

Greg Roberts said...

So when did you originally post this piece?

obakesan said...


thanks ... not sure if this is all the reasons I didn't get into commercial photography more seriously (or if back in the 90's it was the fear of the costs of digital to my business)

but now I photograph just what I like .. maybe someone likes it ... doesn't matter, I do :-)


Cris said...

Just as insightful as it was the first time around.

Daniel Rarela said...

Kirk, you have no idea what a breath of fresh air this is to me.

There's a movie called Mirrormask that contains probably one of the most heartbreaking things I've ever heard someone say:

"Dreams can only take you so far, love. After that you need cash."

I suppose to an extent that's true, but it'd be nice if people didn't have to choose between one or the other. After graduating in 2007, I worked at a part time job for a year, then freelanced for two years after that. Now I'm working at a regular 9-5, and my supervisors already know full well that they're barely even harnessing 10% of what I'm capable of (from a creative standpoint). That said, I'm hoping they won't be too shocked when I finally quit after having earned enough money at this job to pay off my car! :)

If only we could all be financially secure by shooting what we want! I've actually been following your blog for a while... glad to know I'm not the only one willing to throw up a middle finger and pimp the system, as it were :)

Anonymous said...

A really, absolutely fucking amazing piece of writing. Thank you!

david said...

Wonderfully said! You nailed it! Money can't buy real life we wanna live!

Anonymous said...

I don't care what you shoot with. I only care what's going on in your head. The thought process. And how beautifully and fearlessly you put it into words.

mike wilson said...

Great article, Kirk.

After following Chase Jarvis for a while, though, I'd have to politely disagree. I think he does push the boundaries. Maybe not in his actual commercial work, but in his personal work and especially his social media and interaction with up-and-coming photographers and the new technology. He's very supportive and open with the serious-amateur community which (and he's first to admit it) is part of his business strategy, but to say that that isn't having a very large impact on the photo industry is quite silly. And I'm actually a big fan of a lot of his personal work. But I'd agree that his commercial work isn't much more than "adding an extra strip of bacon to the cheeseburger".

I too am curious when you first published this.

kirk tuck said...

April 19th, 2009.

Mike, Thanks. But I want to be clear. I think Chase is a great photographer and if he makes his mark teaching people about marketing and social media, more power to him. It's just that, up to now he hasn't done anything remarkably new and different.

I hate Terry Richardson's work but it will probably stand as a marker for a sea change in the art of commerce. That kind of thing.....

John Taylor said...

in reference to your earlier comments about your abilities as a portrait photographer… Excellent one in this post! It does erode your credibility in the self assessment department mind you :).
Oh and i very much appreciated the re-post of this article and have sent the link to friends.

kirk tuck said...

John, I can both love portraits and be a middle of the road practitioner at the same time. But I appreciate your gracious appraisal. I'm always having fun with it. Except when I try to be like someone else......

Thanks for spreading the word!

Brad C said...

I'm sorry I missed it the first time! Feel free to indulge us with more introspection...