5.31.2019

At one point in my career as an aspiring photographer/artist I was attracted to the process of hand tinting black and white photographs.


I photographed  this image in the Paris apartment of a friend's friend. My friend Penelope had been invited to have lunch with the father and daughter and she asked if I could come along. Penelope fired up her motorcycle, handed me a helmet and told me to "hop on the back and hold on tight." 

As we raced through wide streets my small camera bag swung from side to side behind me as I clung on for dear life. I survived, the lunch was pleasant, and I asked in my atrocious French if it would be okay to take a photograph or two. When I got back home and headed into the darkroom this one grabbed me right off the bat. 

I made a series of 16x20 inch prints and did some judicious and, I hope, restrained hand tinting with Marshall's Oil Colors and tightly rolled cotton.

I took the photograph with a Canon EOS-1 and the 85mm f1.2. It was the very original version of the lens which focused more slowly than any other autofocus lens I have ever used. It was a brutally expensive tool and not at all accommodating, mechanically, but I sure loved some of the images I got from it. Obviously, I did not use it wide open as the only thing that would have been in focus would have been the little girl's eyes. At f4.0 it was just right....

I sold the lens when I got home because life is too short to wait for a ponderous lens to get to its business. And at f4.0 I can think of any number of lenses that would have done just as nice a job. 

Lesson: some stuff is supposed to be super good. It's usually also super expensive. But if it doesn't work for you it's okay to kick it to the curb. 

2 comments:

Kodachromeguy said...

Nice portrait of a pretty little girl. I agree with you that super wide aperture lenses are hard to use well. I wonder how many of the contemporary crowd who claim to "need" f/1.0 or f/1.2 have figured that out? And looking at used Canon ltm lenses, I noticed that the 50mm f/1.2 sells at serious $$$s.

John W said...

The tint of the second print is lovely. Has a very 1920s feel to it. But my hands down favourite is the first one; I can even forgive cutting off the right foot.

I'm old enough to remember when hand tinting was in vogue and thought it was pretty much dead. A few weeks ago someone from the camera club I belong to brought a stunning image of a bouquet to print night. Everyone admired it. His wife had just become a professional florist and he'd photographed her first bouquet converted it to BW and hand tinted it with pastel pencils - gorgeous image. Nice to see the art is still around.

Post a Comment

We Moderate Comments, Yours might not appear right after you hit return. Be patient; I'm usually pretty quick on getting comments up there. Try not to hit return again and again.... If you disagree with something I've written please do so civilly. Be nice or see your comments fly into the void. Anonymous posters are not given special privileges or dispensation. If technology alone requires you to be anonymous your comments will likely pass through moderation if you "sign" them. A new note: Don't tell me how to write or how to blog! I can't make you comment but I don't want to wade through spam!

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.