Alpa 9D with 50mm f1.8 Kern Switar.
The construction of this particular camera makes the new
Leica SL2 look like a Holga by comparison....
Years and years ago I found this Alpa 9D Reflex camera and its partner lens in an ancient camera store in San Antonio. It had its original black leatherette back then but we had to take it off to do a repair and never got around to re-cloaking it. The camera and lens were both built in very small numbers in Switzerland. The top and front of the camera body are all made from a solid, milled, single piece of space age alloy (really, mostly stainless steel) while the removable back and bottom are twice as thick as a Leica M removable back, and the inside workings look as though the camera was made to lounge about in a surgical lab somewhere, looking amazingly precise and well finished.
This camera was as basic as it gets, but "basic" with over 700 finely made (think: fine automatic watch) mechanical parts. It had a rudimentary, center weighted meter but no hot shoe, and the lens was focused wide open and then stopped down to the shooting aperture as you pushed the front mounted shutter release. Even the wind knob (which still works as smoothly as polished motor oil) is different from any other model or brand of camera I've seen.
The specs are ordinary for the period of time in which the 9D was current; shutter speeds from 1 second to 1/1,000th of a second. Flash sync at 1/60th of a second. There are sync sockets for both X sync, FP sync, and M series flashbulbs. The single piece of plastic on the camera is a little window that surrounds the shutter speed setting dial and allows the operator to see what shutter speed is set.
The Kern Switar lens is equally bare-bones. It's non-automatic and has non-linearly spaced f-stops from 1.8 all the way to f22. It focuses down to a little less than 1/8th life size. You need to stop down the lens to meter but the lock allows you to do so without accidentally triggering the shutter while metering....
I used to use my Alpa for "hobby" shooting but it's a slow-to-work camera and, with Tri-X film, I didn't see any improvements over my "much quicker to operate" Leica M and R cameras and lenses. By today's standards it's like working in ultimate slow motion when compared to the latest digi-cams. Earlier SLRs like this one also had dim focusing screens and were notoriously difficult to focus wide open.
Every once in a while I pull this camera out of its storage space to remind myself that one actually had to know what they were doing in the earlier days of photography to be successful image takers. Just getting an acceptable image took time and real effort. We are so spoiled today. But I did insert a roll of Tri-X into the precision innards of the camera today and took some photographs. I'll keep at it until I finish the roll. Not so much to make my own art but to, in some way, channel an era/knowledge base of our craft that is quickly being lost to the collective consciousness of today's photographers. God the camera feels nice to use!
This was my rain, shine, dust storm, perilous and foolish stunts camera.
It shows...
Holy F Stop Batman!!! You really are digging in the dusty corners of photography. You and I are probably the only two living people who know what this is let alone have actually used one. The one I used had the grey Macro Switar 1.8. Interesting piece of photographic archaeology.
ReplyDeleteFor me, the experience of shooting film again, after years of shooting digital, has been completely different than when I shot film before digital. The film cameras are still the same old friends, but that sort of casualness with which I would burn through a roll of film has been replaced with a more studied "got to make each frame count, no looking at the back of the camera, gotta pay close attention to what's in front of me" approach.
ReplyDeleteSo nice to see this!
ReplyDeleteI still own a black version with the macro-switar 1.8 as well.
A true mechanical wonder.
While browsing in a photo store in London I found an adapter for Nikon lenses.
It did the job very well.
Thanks for the post!
Pablo
Back when I was in High School I marveled over the Alpa cameras in the ads for the NYC camera shops. They were really expensive but what struck me was the lens range that offered lenses from (IIRC) about 2mm to 1000mm. Prices were, of course very high.
ReplyDeleteNo one ever reviewed one if I recall but they showed up in the annual lists of available cameras in production.
It can be such a pleasure using a fine mechanical device.
ReplyDeleteIf I remember correctly, the film advance was in the opposite direction....you had to pull back
ReplyDeleteon the advance lever....not push it forward. It weighed a ton...similar to the first Leicaflex.
And yes....you had to know what you were doing back in "the good old days."
You engage the film wind lever with your right hand index finger and pull to the right and back to charge the shutter. You'll never poke yourself in the eye with this camera.....
ReplyDeleteLove it. My only exposure to the brand is an Alpa 5 body in need of a new shutter. I'll have a go at it later.
ReplyDeleteJeff S in Colorado
Oh, oh, Kirk. Now you are in trouble. You dared to write, "one actually had to know what they were doing in the earlier days of photography to be successful image takers." The "photographers" on Dpreview will descend on your blog with pitchforks and venom to dare suggest such a thing.
ReplyDeleteBack to the Apla. The Switar lenses were reputed to be spectacular optical quality. They still sell for a bundle if in good condition.