7.10.2020

James Evan's book, "Crazy from the Heat" is my theme for today. I spent some "quality time" out walking with a new (to me) camera this afternoon. It's a Canon.


Wow. Just wow. 
I'm regressing to a time in 2013 when small, light and potent "point and shoot" cameras were still a thing. And I'm having an epiphany about just how good these little machines were/are. Let me back up and give you some context. Small, inconspicuous, non-interchangeable lens cameras have had a rich history in the world of photography for as long as I can remember. All us refugees from university art programs in the 1970's had a Rollei 35S somewhere in our gear bucket. Minox also made a super small but amazingly good fixed lens 35mm camera that actually could fit in one's pocket back in the 1980's.

Before the DSLR took off like a comet the vast majority of people who wanted to try their hands at photography started out not with a Canon Digital Rebel but with a smaller digital "point and shoot" camera. They were cheaper to buy and easier to use. And, over time, several camera makers upgraded and enhanced their compact cameras' capabilities to the point that they could rival (in good light) cameras twice as big and four times as expensive. 

Canon started producing their G series of cameras back in the very early 2000's. The first model was a G1 which I bought after having used a smattering of Nikon's own Coolpix cameras. The G1 was a 4 megapixel camera (very cool at the time) and it featured a fast zoom lens, good color and nice files. I made images for the first Sweetish Hill Bakery website with that camera!

Canon proceeded to work their way through model numbers making the cameras smaller and more capable. They were the "go-to" option for most photographers who might have spent a fortune on the DSLRs of the day and then needed a less expensive "back up" camera just in case all else failed. 

About 12 years ago Canon tossed a G series camera on the market that really caught everyone's attention. It was the G10 and it was a 14.x megapixel camera with ISO 80 image quality that rivaled just about any comparable resolution camera on the market. The founder of the Luminous Landscape website, an avowed medium format digital camera user, once shot the same landscape shot both with the tiny and (relatively) inexpensive G10 and a big, Hasselblad camera with a digital back. He printed both files nice and large and challenged printers and advanced photographers to guess which print came from which camera. The tally of opinions was more or less a tie. Validation that skill and good light can reduce the expected results of superior technology to a near draw.

I bought a brand new G10 around the time I was working on my third book (Lighting Equipment) for Amherst Media. I was so enamored by the G10 that I used it, on a tripod and at its lowest ISO (80) to do all the equipment still life photographs in the book. I didn't tell anyone at the time and once the images were printed in CMYK they worked well in concert with the demonstration images done with a range of much more expensive and (supposedly) more capable DSLRs. 

I was hooked. For a while. I still have a G10 and take it out from time to time to see what it can do. I am generally still impressed. That camera has the limitation of not being a great high ISO performer and once you go past ISO 200 you start confronting noise.

Last year I bought a slightly used G15 camera. It's 1:1.7 sized sensor has less resolution than the G10 but it's a CMOS sensor and handles low light better. It's 12 megapixels. One of the improvements over the G10 was the return by Canon to the faster lenses that they had outfitted G cameras with prior to the slower G10 lens. The G15 is compact and easy to use but it still delivers great images. I handed it to Belinda to use in Montreal and I've never gotten it back. It has her stamp of approval. And as an art director who has worked with images from a wide range of great advertising photographers that's a tough approval to earn. 

I tried buying another G15 recently but got burned by Amazon.com. A "good" condition G15 arrived with sticky tape residue on the body and a few small scratches on the lens. It's workable but I hate starting behind the eight ball with a camera. I'll always be leery of the effect the scratches may have on my images. That camera lives in a drawer somewhere and when someone needs to borrow a "beater"camera I'll lend them that one in the hopes that they lose it or never return it.....

So, yesterday I was delivering some groceries and treats to my son, Ben, who is quarantining from the pandemic at his house with his roommates and I figured that I was already halfway to Precision Camera and perhaps I should just drop by and see if they had any interesting new arrivals in the used cabinets. I'm always on the look out for interesting photographic artifacts. 

There in the case were two identical G16s. The G16 is the final expression of the long running G cameras from Canon and is basically an ultra-tweaked version of the G15. Still 12 megapixels and still the same 28-140mm f1.8 to 2.8 lens but a new processor and some new features. And....tweakiness.

Unlike the G15 that Amazon sent along these two G16 bodies were lovingly cared for and looked, for the most part, like we'd just pulled them out of a factory sealed box. I bought one on the spot. On the way home I second guessed (started to regret?) my spur of the moment purchase and decided to go out today and really test out the camera to see if I was just buying nostalgia or a real, useful and unique camera. 

I headed out around 2 p.m. today, just as the temperature crested the 100 degree mark. With the humidity factored in it felt like 106. But I was dressed for the adventure and, of course, had my goofy but protective wide brimmed hat. 

While the G16 isn't going to win any contests for super-wide dynamic range it's impressively sharp, the auto white balance is right on the money about 95% of the time and it's a delight to carry around on a hot, oppressive day. 

Instead of my usually walk through downtown I decided to do a loop around and through the University of Texas and the environs. I did seven years there as a student and three as a specialist lecturer in the College of Fine Arts. I go back once or twice a year to lecture to classes for friends who teach in photojournalism but every time I go there's a new building, a new pedestrian boulevard, or a new high rise tower. Today was no different. 

So, I've attached some of the photos I made from my hour and a half in the heat to show off the capabilities of the little G16. I am very happy with my copy. So much so that I called my brilliant sales associate at the store and asked him to hold the second one till I get back out there. Everyone's got to have a hobby; I guess my newest hobby is cornering the market on older "point and shoot" technology. Captions where motivated.

At the fried Chicken place on Guadalupe. 
The G16 image stabilization is wonderful. Works well in video too.


You can't buy happiness but you can buy pristine Canon G series cameras...
That's kinda the same thing!


Working hard to keep the detail in the white electrical conduit...


Medici on the drag is closed until further notice. 
The paucity of good coffee to go is becoming near critical...


I have no idea what eyebrow threading is or why UT students might need it...


the G12 has a built in ND filter. It works well. I wish all P/S cameras had one. 



Mural in open shade. On the Drag.



















I found a spot next to one of the engineering buildings where the cold air from the air conditioning system flowed outside. Funny to be walking around in a hundred degrees of heat and find a "bubble" of 68 degree air. A nice place to stop and make some camera menu changes.

go ahead. blow it up. It's amazingly sharp.

I know a lot about art, I just don't know what I like...











Walking by this enormous pit just north of the state capitol. 
They're building a series of gigantic buildings just across from the 
Texas History Museum. Huge, huge project. Many cranes...

And then back to the patient Subaru Forester. The latest VSL staff car. 
I've had it for a year and five months and I have about 12,000 miles racked up. 
Not a big year for driving long distances...

Maybe next year. 

I had a big iced tea in a thermos bottle in the car. How refreshing!

That's it. The newest studio arrival under $300. 

18 comments:

MikeR said...

This post prompted me to go back to 2007, when my camera for a trip to Italy was a Canon A530. (I didn't want to carry the street theft magnet Nikon DSLR). Makes me wonder why, if one is neither commercial nor art photographer, you would need anything other than a good point and shoot.

Maybe I should sell everything else, but keep my Lumix LX100, which served me well in Iceland?

JC said...

Every time you go walkabout with some camera designed for point-n-shooters, I'm tempted to get out my 6.1 mp Epson R-D1 rangefinder and stroll around Santa Fe to see what I can see. It's mounted with a totally manual Voightlander 40mm f1.4; the biggest problem is that my aging eyes have a problem with the split image rangefinder. Anyway, in reaction to your post (and I give the corona virus some credit as well, having reduced my non-TV entertainment options to nil) I got it out today and fired it up. Still works. 6.1 mp. Curious, I looked it up on eBay and my god, the cheapest "near mint" used one I could find was going for almost $1500, and there were 18 watchers for that one. I suddenly liked it better. Maybe tomorrow...

Jon Porter said...

A very productive walk recording the vitality of downtown Austin; the G17 performed admirably!

I, too, was enamored enough with the G10 that I took it as my only camera on a Caribbean cruise in 2009. The lack of weight and bulk over an SLR and several lenses was liberating. And I have an Itoya album full of 8.5x11 photos that are just fine. Plus I can actually "improve" those files from the G10 by using the much better editing software and printer that I have today.

Gato said...

I had a G-something -- maybe an 8 -- that was a favorite for several years. It would fit in a pocket -- though a tight fit. Every time you write about these I find myself on ebay checking. Haven't found the right camera at the right price yet, but someday ...

Victor Bloomfield said...

The Panasonic Lumix ZS200 serves for a lot of my photography. It's about the size of the Canon G series cameras, but functions as a sort of miniaturized FZ1000 that you've found praiseworthy, with a 1-inch, 20Mp sensor and an equivalent 24-360 zoom. It got a bad reputation in DPReview for a soft lens, but that's not been my experience. I have several M4/3 cameras and lenses, and they're excellent; but I often wonder why I'm not just taking the ZS200.

Anonymous said...

Wow. That's a really great set of Pop arty style photos from your walk there. Absolutely love the graphic composition of the signs and buildings. Great colours.

Maybe I am in the market for a kick around Rx100 after all...
Hope you're keeping well and staying safe.
Mark

Robert Roaldi said...

I still have a G3 that works. The 2 batteries hold charge too. An interesting feature is that it came with a wall plug DC power supply, which makes the camera pretty handy for timelapse work. It's only 4 mpix and I have to be careful of the framing for 16:9 aspect work, but there is still plenty of pixels left for goofy youtube videos. I've printed 8x10s from it, they're fine. And if/when it breaks, I won't care.

Anonymous said...

Some of those sample photos are really great. I love the mural with the big hand coming in from the right. The colors and tones are beautiful. Thanks for doing a retro review.

Greg Heins said...

I got to the point in your blog where you described leaving the store with only one of the two identical cameras, and I thought, "Somebody's hacked Kirk's blog! That's not him!" But then I saw that everything turned out OK. I can only assume that the extreme heat between the car and the store must have affected you...

Jeff Smith said...

Yeah, three cheers for a decent compact camera. It sure is less to carry and I continue to be amazed with the quality of the output of some of them. I remember a wow moment when I bought a Panasonic LX3, it was the first pocket camera I owned where I could actually see dust on some of the things I photographed. The Olympus ZX1 followed and it had a superb lens. In 2012 my compact became a Sony RX100, and wow 11 x 14 prints left nothing to be desired, and even poster size was very good.

Alas, in my fickle world, wanting even more, I was back into interchangeable lens cameras, carrying more stuff around. Sure I have a larger sensor mirrorless camera which I will keep around, but I am kinda coming full-circle getting a Canon GX5 Mark 2. It’s a joy to be less encumbered and still get very good photographs. Jeff

Bassman said...

My presence was for the Canon S series, starting with the S50 and ending with the S90. Most of the older ones got given away; the last one got dropped by my sister and didn’t survive. Nice cameras, as long as there wasn’t too much glare to use the LCD, as the viewfinders were tiny.

Michael Matthews said...

My introduction to digital cameras was a Canon G3 in the early 2000s. Huh...I thought...this is a tiny TV camera that takes still frames. Four megapixels, fully articulating swing-out screen, beautiful closeup and medium shots, and an introduction to the concept of chromatic aberration in wider shots of leafless trees. Plus occasional flaming hot stuck pixels. But that's what Photoshop is for, no? It was all I needed for seven or eight years.

This series of walkabout shots really deserves a click-through to the higher resolution display. Amazing amount of detail.

Kirk, Photographer/Writer said...

Greg, I called the store as soon as I finished looking at the photos above in Lightroom. I asked my favorite sales person to put the camera on hold for me. I also asked for the same discount I received on the first camera. I just came home from picking up the second one and it's every bit as pristine as the first. I guess I should write a short post about why I like to buy cameras in lots of two --- when I can. Seems like many people are confused by this buying strategy. Maybe I am too. Maybe writing about it will help me sort it all out...

Kirk, Photographer/Writer said...

MM, When I saw the big mural at the fried chicken restaurant of the big hand against the blue background I almost spit out my Dom Perignon. I never expected the colors would be so rich and the detail so accurate. An amazing performance given the expenditure of a whopping $260.

Now selling off everything else. Packing my newest system into my shaving kit...

Mike Shwarts said...

I had the G15 until a few months ago. I had picked up used Sony RX100iii. Fully functional, but it must have been dropped more than one once. I dropped it once about 18" onto a brick hearth. I liked the G15, but the RX100 has a bigger sensor and the pop-up EVF beats the tunnel the G15 uses for a viewfinder. It went to a friend who could use a small camera when he doesn't want to lug around his big Nikon.

atmtx said...

Well, I have quite the digital point and shoot collection too. So you are not the only one. I'm really enjoying these cameras for their compact size and solid image quality.

John Krumm said...

Back when I taught the newspaper class in a high school our first digital camera (after my dpreview research) was a G3 I think. Very competent. Would run full 11 x 17 photos sometimes (newspaper did not require high res). And it worked with an external flash, if I remember correctly.

Chris Beloin said...

Kirk -
Enjoyed your exploration of the Canon G16 - KEH had one not too far off your price point so I picked one up - supposingly in excellent condition.

I will try it out to see if it will work for my "small camera" solution.

Any tips on best practices in setting up the camera? I want to shoot raw but will need to explore from there.

Thanks - Chris