2.10.2021

Delivering 1984 Kodachromes in current tech times. File organization? Who? Me?

 

Texas Governor, Ann Richards
at a Mondale-Ferraro rally in 1984.
Austin, Texas.

I was working in the ad business back in 1984 but I still spent time walking around with my camera. I heard that Fritz Mondale and Geraldine Ferraro, who were running for president and vice president at the time, would be at a rally at the Texas State Capitol so I put on a pair of shoes, grabbed a couple rolls of Kodachrome 64 (as in: ISO 64), my favorite camera and a 135mm lens. 

Politicians weren't as precious back then so there weren't layers and layers of security to wade through in order to get close to the speakers and presenters. You could just, kinda, walk up to the front row, about 30 feet from the candidates and claim a bit of territory on which to stand. So I did.

I photographed a handful of frames of Mondale and Ferraro and then Ann Richards gave a short speech. At the end of her speech everyone cheered and someone handed her a bouquet of yellow roses. She reached up and tipped her hat and I shot a frame of film. Slide film. No wiggle room. No post processing magic available at the time. Thankfully, I nailed the exposure but I was hand-holding the camera and lens at around 1/60th of a second and it was before the wimpy times of image stabilization everywhere. It's not the most tack sharp frame I've made in my career but it's acceptable.

The image turned out well enough and got some use by the Richards people for a spell. I wish I had taken more frames but in that time period, if you weren't on assignment and were shooting for fun, you might try one frame and save the next five or six shots on the roll in case anything else, weirder or more picturesque, popped up. 

When Ann passed away a few years back I had a bunch of requests for use of the image. I searched my computer and found some that I'd scanned at a decent (but not great!!!) size. I think the biggest scan was something like 1600 by 1000 pixels. But everyone's use was either newspaper or web so everyone was happy to get the smaller files. It's a good thing I had the scans because I was unable to put my hands on the original transparency even after searching for days....

Yesterday, one of the partners at Pentagram, (https://www.pentagram.com) which bills itself as "The world's largest independent design consultancy", got in touch and asked me if they could use (and pay a fee for) that image to integrate into a project about Ann Richards. I was flattered and thrilled as I have followed the agency, and the requesting partner, for decades.  We e-mailed back and forth and agreed on terms. He'd sent along a digital copy of the image as a reference for our conversation so I assumed he had what he needed.

As you might guess, a half hour later one of the people actually responsible for production got in touch and requested I send to them the highest resolution version possible of the image that I might have. I panicked. 

I spent most of yesterday evening busting open boxes I've been storing for decades looking for that one chrome. I looked through every folder in every drawer in every filing cabinet but kept coming up empty-handed. Finally, I dusted off the last box, poured everything out onto the floor of the studio and went through every slide page. And there, at the very bottom of the stack, was that Ann Richards image, stuck in a slide page with 19 unrelated images. 

My euphoria was short-lived. I had donated my last film scanner about eight years ago and I have no idea who in Austin still scans slides. I decided to do it myself and ran into the next brick wall. I no longer have a copy stand or a set of macro lenses with which to do slide copies. I took a breath and looked up an article about copying slides using newer, high resolution cameras and macro lenses. At that point I was confident the new Leica, or the ancient Panasonic S1R, would resolve more detail than the slide contained, but I lacked a well corrected macro lens. Rabbit hole, rabbit hole. 

I showed up at the camera store a bit after they opened today to buy the Sigma 70mm f2.8 Art series macro lens and a horizontal arm for my tripod. Back at home base I put my camera into electronic shutter mode and set an eight second delay to prevent any sort of vibration from degrading the shots and, after super careful focusing, I banged off five or six big, 47 megapixel raw files. I spent an hour dust spotting and fine tuning and then sent along huge, layered PSD and Tiff files. 

If I submitted this job to a business expert they would quickly divine that I'd done everything wrong and could have had the slide scanned for about $20. If I wanted a really wonderful scan I might have paid $60. Instead I dropped something like $650 to "scan" a fairly low resolution, 37 year old Kodachrome slide in a cardboard mount. I don't really care. I always wanted to do something with Pentagram. And I needed to figure out a quick way to copy more favorite old 35mm and MF negatives that I want to use from time to time. I'll mark this as a win... but also a hard lesson about filing and organization. I'm not sure you really own something if you can't find it. 

Why did I write this? Because I'm scared of two things in life: shots and blood tests. This post kept my mind off my upcoming, 5:00 pm appointment to be vaccinated; for about an hour. A good trade off yet again. 

Now I have copies of my favorite "Ann" photograph on multiple hard drives and also tucked away up in the cloud. Next time someone asks to use the image it should require nothing more that a few mouse clicks to get to a huge file. But I'm less happy imagining all the time it's going to take to organize a couple hundred thousand other slides..... Maybe it's best to not even start.

15 comments:

Greg Heins said...

Terrific photo. No wonder it's in demand. If you can devote that camera, lens, &c. to a permanent setup in a corner of your studio and get it nailed down to alignment, etc., you'll have a terrific and timesaving way to work on your archive.

Kirk, Photographer/Writer said...

Hi Greg, We're thinking along the same lines. When I went through knee deep piles of negatives and transparencies I saw so many great (to me) ones that I'm hungry to share more and more. I also bought a side for my big tripod to make setting up, leveling and fine-tuning more practical. The cameras now seem ready made to be good copy cameras. Electronic shutter, eight second release delay and magnified fine focusing. It's great.

Thanks, Kirk

David said...

Lots of personality in that slide. No wonder everyone wants to use it.

I have 20+ boxed, kodak slide carousels. About half photos were take with family and half with friends. They cover a period from 1972 through early 1980s. I have a good scanner for paper photos, slides, and negatives and have actually scanned two of the boxes. I did that about 8 years ago before I retired and figured I'd do the rest after retirement when I'd have lots of free time.

Haven't touched them since I scanned the second box. While I'd like to have them all scanned and touched up real nice I've realized it doesn't really matter. The outcome would not be worth the effort.

My thought is yes, it is best not to even start.

Mel said...

Ann Richards is one of my most favorite Texans (I lived in Ft. Worth for five years so I get to claim a few favorites). She's famous for her quote about Bush during the convention but that's not nearly her best quotes. A couple of my favorites are:

"I get a lot of cracks about my hair, mostly from men who don't have any."

"Let me tell you I'm the only child of a very rough-talking father. So don't be embarrassed by about your language. I've either heard it or I can top it."

Ah, Kodachrome. I still have a few rolls in the freezer, just for old times. It was picky to use but when you hit it right you had an image that would last. All my Ektachromes from 20-30 years ago have color shifts but my Kodachrome slides are as colorful as when new.

Thanks for sharing that great image and story. If my slide scanner ever breaks I might be looking up your set-up.

SW Rick said...

Trust you are back from your vaccination and all is well. MY wife and I got our first shots today, everything went well.

I just started "DSLR Scanning", and suggest if you want to do this with some frequency, consider a copy stand you can leave set up. Unless you dedicate your tripod and arm to this, it grows old to have to set this system up more than once :)

Rick

atmtx said...

I LOVE this photo.

Kirk, Photographer/Writer said...

Thanks ATMTX. It's also one of my old favorites.

Anonymous said...

You made me laugh when I read you comment about how the chrome wasn't super sharp. Every time I make this comment on the web, I get a lot of crap from amateur and wannabe semi pro photographers who spend more time on reviews and lens testing that demand the highest possible resolution. My comment is why? How would your shot be any better with what the rabble call
critical sharpness? Not a dam bit better is the answer. I'll bet all the sharpness guys haven't got a request for use of their images, ever to line a birdcage.

Bill Pearce

M. Hartt said...

Great photo Kirk. Thoroughly captures the charm of Governor Richards. Many of us still miss her. More than just a character, we could certainly use some of her compassion, common sense, and humor again. Unfortunately, she may have been one-of-a-kind. Thanks for the memory.

jmarc schwartz said...

Hi kirk, je me suis souvent trouvé devant cette situation de recherche. On trouve enfin ce que l'on cherche toujours à la fin, toujours. Alors, j'ai une astuce maintenant, je commence par la fin, et je trouve tout de suite. Gain de temps énorme. Portes toi bien.

Gunny said...

I'm trying to remember; would that have still been good old ASA 64 back in '84 (rather than ISO)?

JC said...

A golfing friend of mine had a long relationship with Ann Richards. He spoke of her in a casual way that made her seem truly extraordinary. I never met her, didn't realize how pretty she was. There was a clutch of Texas people back then who hung out together, and they tended to smoke and drink. And then, smoke and drink some more. Both Richards and my friend died of cancer linked to smoking. And drinking.

Rich said...

Kirk, when are we going to get your take on the SL2 ... or is it just an S1R wrapped inside a "nice piece of industrial design."
To a working Pro like you, I figure its worth the price, for the badge alone. (PR is so huge in our world!)

Anthony Bridges said...

Cool photo Kirk. I like the composition and especially the color.

I have a Canon scanner I use to scan slides. The holder is capable up to 6x7 medium format.

Steve Hutchison said...

I’ve had excellent success ‘scanning’ my slides with a DSLR fitted with a 60mm macro lens and a slide copying device made by Nikon. As they are fixed together camera shake is not a real problem and I light them with a flash on a curly cord in front of the camera set to TTL. Quick, and not that dirty.

Post a Comment

We Moderate Comments, Yours might not appear right after you hit return. Be patient; I'm usually pretty quick on getting comments up there. Try not to hit return again and again.... If you disagree with something I've written please do so civilly. Be nice or see your comments fly into the void. Anonymous posters are not given special privileges or dispensation. If technology alone requires you to be anonymous your comments will likely pass through moderation if you "sign" them. A new note: Don't tell me how to write or how to blog! I can't make you comment but I don't want to wade through spam!

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.