9.02.2018

Which camera maker will be the first one to incorporate graphene super capacitors instead of traditional batteries? And other random, industry-centric thoughts.

With all the bubbling, frenetic attention we've been paying to camera introductions I think we missed, almost entirely, the latest news about graphene super capacitors. Researchers have found new ways to work with graphene distribution and to incorporate it into super capacitor manufacturing. What would this mean for cameras? Much faster charging cycles (by a factor of 10X?), much higher current handling and thousands more charge and discharge cycles than we currently get from lithium batteries. The downside? The graphene super capacitors are still mostly lab proof of concept examples right now. But in five years......? They might just be the next portable power source...

I predict that in five and one half years every high end, mirrorless camera will feature this new technology and then battery life will largely cease to be an issue.....

My 2010 prediction that we would abandon optical viewfinders in favor of EVFs is coming true in front of our eyes. Gosh! Was that series of predictions really eight years ago?

We are at an inflection point with expensive cameras. Hasselblad and Fuji medium format cameras made the leap to the EVF future and now Canon and Nikon are following along after Sony. If Nikon's foray into the Z universe is successful (and pre-sales indicate that it will be...) I can't imagine that higher spec pro units aren't just ahead, from everyone.

This will be, on a smaller scale, reminiscent of the switch from film cameras to digital cameras. Pundits predicted the film-to-digital switch would take twenty years for the transition but the majority of adopters had new digital cameras in their hands in the space of two years. The transition to mass market mirrorless will be equally quick and decisive. In the short run Nikon, Canon and other new arrivals will benefit from sales resulting from full system replacements and pent up demands from Canon and Nikon users for mirrorless tech.

CF cards are almost completely dead and I can't think of a single camera maker who is introducing a new product with a CF card as part of the design/feature set. If you plan to keep your D700's and other CF hungry cameras around for decades to come you may want to start salting away lots of current, state of the art CF cards to fill the void that WILL be created by the mass exodus from the market by card makers.

But don't get too comfy with SD cards, even the UHS-II cards might be nearing a tragic end-of-life, being displaced by QXD cards that offer a more robust package and better performance. Oh gosh! All this change is so.....disquieting.

Electronic flash that plugs into the wall is on the way out. Oh, people will still want powerful flashes that can slam light through soft boxes, and go toe-to-toe with the sun, but they're quickly becoming comfortable with battery-powered units and the convenience of not having to carry extension cords or find electrical outlets will carry the day and all the money we've sunk into A/C powered Profoto units, Elinchrom units and other pricy brands will haunt us as we source supremely cost effective new units with lightweight battery packs that go on forever and ever. Until those, in turn, are replaced by graphene  super capacitor energy source packing lights.

It's all so quick and zany. Sometimes the rush of progress makes me want to rush to the camera store, buy bricks and bricks of medium format Tri-X film for the old Hasselblad and re-purchase another enlarger. I hear they are going cheap these days...at least on the used market.

Just a few thoughts for a cloudy, humid and scowling Sunday afternoon.

And, yes, my visit to San Antonio was fun and happy. Dad is doing very well.

Sometimes the old stuff lasts and lasts....

From the set of "Tortoise and the Hare" at Zach Theatre. Post rehearsal.




12 comments:

MikeR said...

This Island Earth, 1955 sci-fi, scientists are sent an amazingly powerful substitute for the capacitors they had ordered. Could it have been...?

Gilly said...

Graphene, its been powering my pencil for years. Oh wait, wrong substance.

Malcolm Myers said...

I think if they sort graphene batteries out (and I'm sure they will one day) then it'll be more than just cameras that will change. But five and a half years? That's a very specific prediction! Are you sure you're not from the future? If so can you drop me this Saturday's lottery numbers? Don't worry, I'll order your Nikon Z6 for you, I might even stretch to a spare battery ;)

David said...

This post reminded me of this great comic:
https://xkcd.com/1909/
And I thought SD would last longer.

Nigel said...

Solid state rechargeables, not super capacitors, and very small ones are already shipping:
https://asia.nikkei.com/Business/Technology/In-race-for-better-batteries-Japan-hopes-to-extend-its-lead

Art in LA said...

"The only constant is change" ... the one thing I remember from a graduation ceremony.

Yes, things can last a long time. I *still* use my Sony NEX-3 from time to time. I remember being so hesitant buying that thing, but I wanted to dip my toe in the water and check out the new tech of 2010. This was the cheapest entry point. Nowadays when I'm out shooting, I generally will take a little mirrorless. I still shoot my A77ii because of its ergonomics for sports, but that's infrequent.

When I want to shoot full-frame though, I grab one of my old film bodies, LOL. I'll get an A7 flavor one of these days. $1000 for the body is my magic price point.

Michael Meissner said...

As long as the batteries/capacitors/etc. are generally safe to hold, are replaceable in the field, can be carried in airline carry-on luggage, can be recharged in under 6 hours or less from normal power, and it doesn't cost too much (in comparison to the camera) to bring spare batteries, I don't care what the technology that stores the power is called, or how it operates at the micro level.

Unless the battery life is measured in weeks (or months) of continuous usage, if you can't change the batteries on gear and be able replace the battery with a spare in under 5 minutes in field conditions, Murphy's Law will guarantee that your batteries will run flat at the worst possible time.

Kodachromeguy said...

Kirk, go ahead and buy some bricks of Tri-X, as long as you have some freezer space in which to store it. Really, a hundred rolls does not take up too much volume. Kodak Alaris seems to be doing pretty well right now with film manufacture, but look a few years out, and who can predict the economics of film coating? Some unfortunate incident like a fire at their coating plant might tip the scale. I am still slowly using 120-size Panatomic-X that I bought 30 years ago. Sure, sure, TMax 100 is probably almost the same grain, but I like the Panatomic "look."

Anonymous said...

The future electric car industry is driving the research into superfast charging and high capacity and where the big money is going to be. An electric car has a lot of batteries.
One potential issue though is that the more energy you're able to store the bigger the bang when it goes wrong.
They'll be manufacturing billions of batteries a year and inevitably some less scrupulous manufacturers will start cutting corners. Plus consumers abuse batteries through overcharging, letting the voltage get too low, using damaged batteries and so forth, unaware of the dangers.
This is what happens with many of the cheap, unbranded lithium ion batteries currently and has led to restrictions on flights and postal services etc. because of issues.
The thought of these batteries having ten times or more power is actually quite scary.

Noons said...

Amazing post! Reminded me my garden tools are now all rechargeable battery operated.
A few years ago I had to remember to fill up the jerry-can to use them.
Now? 30 minutes in the charger and off we go. And they don't discharge when idle, like the old rechargeable batteries used to.
My "champion" tool now is a rechargeable 36V chainsaw: it made short work of the overgrown garden hedge and shrubs and I can operate any of these tools even if rain is sprinkling! No worries about water in the petrol or getting zapped by a wet power cord!
Same goes for inside the house with vacuum cleaners: they all are on rechargeable batteries! They make life so much easier!
Can't wait for cameras to use the same kind.
And cars and everything else!
:)

Anonymous said...

Noons, cameras do use the same type of battery technology as your rechargeable vacuum cleaner, power tools, mobile phones and laptops. And have done for over ten years.
Usually a Lithium ion variant (lithium polymer).
They have increased the capacity/efficiency over the years but the only real difference is that the number of cells in your vacuum cleaner is much larger which gives it the extra power needed.
There are risks with this technology which is why manufacturers build lots of protection into them. When they do go wrong they can give out some nasty toxic gases and burn at very high temperatures if they short circuit.
https://batteryuniversity.com/learn/article/types_of_lithium_ion

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5577247/

adam said...

new bm pocket cinema camera 4k uses cf-fast cards, also has sd port (as you might already know as you've pre-ordered one)

Post a Comment

We Moderate Comments, Yours might not appear right after you hit return. Be patient; I'm usually pretty quick on getting comments up there. Try not to hit return again and again.... If you disagree with something I've written please do so civilly. Be nice or see your comments fly into the void. Anonymous posters are not given special privileges or dispensation. If technology alone requires you to be anonymous your comments will likely pass through moderation if you "sign" them. A new note: Don't tell me how to write or how to blog! I can't make you comment but I don't want to wade through spam!

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.