6.24.2020

I read the press release about Olympus selling off their camera division and it immediately reminded me of the fates of Polaroid and Kodak. Salvaged for the names and parts.


There is a press release from Olympus posted over on the DPReview.com website. Go there to read it if you want the details. The TL:DR is that Olympus is "carving out" its camera division and selling it to a Japanese holding company which plans to "operate" the concern with the intention of continuing to make cameras, lenses and accessories. But I think we've all seen how this kind of corporate move plays out. It's more of an exercise in salvage than anything else. 

I know many folks will rush to blame Olympus management but it's good to be rational and admit that the whole camera sector is being beaten like scrambled eggs right now and Olympus is a small enough player which makes the beating so much harder. Even before the pandemic camera sales in nearly every category have been falling, year-over-year. Now, with massive unemployment growing in every corner of the globe the ability and desire on the part of  most consumers to rush out and buy more cameras seem like fantasy. 

The Olympus cameras have always been alluring. From the compact but potent size of the bodies to the flashes of sheer brilliance in lens design Olympus offered a fun and highly competent alternate option to all the homogenous cameras that Canon and Nikon pumped out into the digital markets over the last 20 years. Olympus has also been at the forefront of innovation with things like industry leading image stabilization. 

My first brush with Olympus cameras was playing with my wife's OM-1 film camera back when we were dating in the college years. It was the perfect camera for her smaller hands and logical way of operating. Later, when I was working in an ad agency I discovered the amazing world of Olympus Pen F, half frame film cameras. Olympus designed (in the late 1960s and early 1970s) and built an entire professional system around the idea of the half frame camera. A camera that would take 72 shots on a roll of 35mm film. It featured a rotary, titanium shutter that sync'd with flash at all shutter speeds. Right up to the top speed of 1/500th of a second. The camera used interchangeable lenses, many of which were brilliant and beautiful optical tools. I still have a collection of my favorite lenses from that era (1970's) and still use them, with adapters, on current micro four thirds cameras. They are also a good match for Sony a6x00 series cameras and most of the lenses amply cover the APS-C sensors. 

It was fun to use the very robust and solid Olympus digital bridge cameras, the E-10 and E-20. We did solid, commercial work with those 4 and 5 megapixels, all-in-one cameras over the course of a year. In fact, it was this line of cameras that helped transition thousands of former film photographers into digital photographers. 

The E-1 camera (pictured above with Amy) was a magnificent camera but probably one that led the company down the path to where they find themselves now. In the early part of this century the costliest part of every digital camera, by far, was the sensor. The bigger the sensor the more astronomical the price. I don't think Olympus did a good job at predicting how quickly sensor prices would drop. They went all in on the smaller sensor and designed all of their new lenses around the geometry of a sensor that is a quarter the size of a traditional, 35mm type sensor. But over time the majority of camera buyers pined for the "full frame" they had become used to in the film days.

The lenses for the Olympus DSLRs were/are so cool. My favorite was the 35-100mm f2.0 zoom lens. It was a heavy beast but it was sharp wide open and so much fun to play with. Their lens line-up for their conventional DSLR m4:3 cameras was ambitious. It was also built on three tiers. There was a consumer line which was mostly slower zoom lenses. A step up line that featured good glass and better build quality. And then there was a professional line of lenses that were, for the most part, uncompromising. Looking back one can see that their 7-14mm lens was a game changer for the industry. Super-wide and super sharp. 

Olympus was so far ahead of their bigger competitors that they, along with partner Panasonic, killed off their first interchangeable DSLR systems and made the switch to a mirrorless concept years ahead of any other camera company. It was a brilliant move and opened up the modern, digital camera world to the use of legacy lenses from a vast range of system on a modern camera. I loved the ability to use old Pen F lenses, Leica lenses, Nikon lenses and so many other on the system. 

For a while I was all the way into the Olympus system and found a remarkably good value in the second generation of the OMD EM-5 camera, the OMD EM-5ii. The image stabilization was, at the time, like science fiction. The video capabilities of the camera were highly underrated as well. My friend, James and I used multiple EM-5ii cameras and a box full of lenses to make this video: 
https://vimeo.com/137964319  In the five years since we did this newer cameras have launched featuring 4K video files and some improvements but the files from that time frame, out of the EM-5ii never stop impressing me when I re-visit the video...

Olympus have always had a loyal following for their cameras and lenses. Even after I moved on from the camera bodies I still had a love affair with the lenses. The one Olympus lens I really regretted selling was the 12-100mm f4.0 Pro series lens which I used extensively on Panasonic G9 cameras. It is a superb lens. Absolutely wonderful. And the 40-150mm f2.8 was/is...perfect.

I'd like to be optimistic and hold out hope that the new company will take the ball from Olympus and run for some new and worthwhile goals. I'd hate to see the choice of Olympus's alternative vision removed from the marketplace. They have consistently made wonderful and inventive products and produced them at a very high level. 

If they fall into the same Hell as Polaroid then who will Sony steal new innovations from? 

I have no way of predicting the outcome. I have no idea if the products currently on the market will see a run up in price and a rush to hoard them against some future shortage. Or, when the direction of the new company becomes obvious will these jewel-like cameras hit the wall causing a sell off of orphaned system parts? 

Sad either way. The long shot hope is the new camera company rising like a Phoenix and mounting a dramatic comeback. We can always hope.

Photos from the EP-2 taken on a trip to West Texas in 2010.




















25 comments:

crduke said...

The camera business was a deep wellspring of pride for the Olympus Company, to the extent that they carried it even when it was a drag on the bottom line. I suspect that new leadership as a result of the financial scandal has weakened the connection to this corporate heritage. JIP has no such connection and the "intention" language in the press release is no more than wishful thinking (or guilty denial)on the part of Olympus. A Kodak Moment is truly at hand. As a long time Oly guy (Pen-D, Pen-FT, 8080WZ, E330, EP1, EP3, EM5, EM1-II) I am very sad to see this.

scott kirkpatrick said...

I loved my E-1, too. But lost it to a burglary and was happy to move on to the 16 MPx mirrorless models. I'm still using the E-M1-ii and the two wonderful zooms, 7-14 and 12-100. They probably aren't worth enough for the hassle of E-Bay selling, and they still offer good image stabilization for video. Olympus used to have good "no questions asked" repair policies, but I guess now the stuff I have left will just have to age gracefully.

Gato said...

Sad news indeed. I owned and loved a Pen F half frame back in the day.

In digital I owned and loved an E-10, but when I was ready to move on the size and price of the E-1 put me off and I switched to Nikon -- and was never truly happy. Within a year I went back to Olympus. Finally switched to Panasonic when they went mirrorless, but kept using the Oly 14-54 lens for years after.

Now my bodies are all Panasonic, but my "real work" lens is the 12-100. Hope it holds up well -- I don't see anything on the market that would replace it for me.

I'll keep my fingers crossed, but if I had to bet money I'd bet Oly is going the way of Polaroid.


Michael Matthews said...

Those West Texas photos, especially the bold colors of the B&B detail shots, are what lured me to Olympus. Along with the accompanying text, of course. When I finally sold the EM 5.2 and the 60mm macro I hated doing it. By then it occurred to me that I had become a camera fetishist: just handling the marvelous combination of materials, design, and mechanical action produced a feeling of satisfaction. But, it had to go. Out with the old, in with the new Panasonic G9. The new has more potential - for video in particular. But picking it up does not produce that tactile sense of wonder.

TMJ said...

Olympus are a wonderful lens maker, possibly should have ditched the camera business and concentrated on optics.

Incidentally, their film OM system had the most comprehensive macro range that ever existed. Just look at the pitiful offerings of digital Canon, Nikon, etc..

Joe R said...

Stick a fork in it. Olympus is dead. Private equity companies rape and pillage until there is nothing left.

ODL Designs said...

I was honestly surprised when I read the news. When you consider the bulk of the effort for the Mount was spent on a comprehensive lens suite and backbone technology I was optimistic they would focus on compelling bodies.

However as you say we just got a massive global recession and all companies are cutting dead weight, so I can hardly blame them.

In all honesty I immediately looked at the resale value of my equipment and window shopped alternatives, I was surprised how few companies have such flexible workhorse lenses as m43rds with excellent magnification and close focus almost a standard.

I closed up my window and decided to just keep shooting what I got. It is all paid for and clients keep sending me business. I might go ahead and supplement with Fuji medium format, plus a couple of zooms, but we will see

Lovely article Kirk!

David Lemieux said...

That was written like an obituary and yes, unfortunately Olympus is dead. I own the EM-1 and 12-40/40-150 combo and will continue to shoot till they don't work. Panasonic was smart to move to a "full frame" sensor.

Chris Beloin said...

Greetings Kirk -
Thanks for you thoughts on Olympus & and camera industry overall. It is certainly a challenging and declining market, especially with COVID still raging in parts of the country. They are not alone. I have degrees from 4 colleges & two of them closed just in the Spring 2020 semester alone!

I am keeping my EM-1.II and 12-100 Oly zoom. Less than $2,000 invested for both & this combination works well for my photography. I hope to get a good number of years with this setup and would even buy the EM-1.III once its pricing drops below $900 too.

I still dream of an updated Pen F.II to come out - what a beautiful camera!

Less options for photographers is not a good thing, so I hope they can stay in business - but I fear that the value of their patents & technology, like IBIS, might be worth more than the actual business operation itself.

amolitor said...

Private equity is not a death knell. Phase One and Hasselblad seem to be doing ok.

It really depends on the firm. Some of them are shipbreakers and some of them are shipbuilders.

Anonymous said...

I was a big fan of the Olympus compact film cameras!

The Olympus XA was design master piece - I think it is the smallest rangefinder camera available ever. The cheaper sister model XA2 didn't have the range finder but it was one of my favourites too. Both with the clever clam-shell design!

Later I had an Olympus Stylus Epic (aka Mju II) which was wheather-sealed and even more compact, and was auto-everything but with a spot meter.

I also used an Olympus 35 RC for a while - this simple camera was just fantastic as well.

In the digital age I briefly used an E-PL2 but did not bond very much with it and the images I got were not convincing. I moved to Fuji when the X100 1st generation came out, and stayed in their ecosystem ever since.

Yoram Nevo said...

An obituary indeed. And that short film could have been a great Olympus commercial. It is edited to perfection. I remember as a young child always looking at the Olympus cameras commercials in National Geographic magazine. They were the most beautiful, clever and elegant. I always wanted Olympus but ended with A Nikon. May Oly rest in peace in photo heaven.

Unknown said...

As a Minolta (now Sony) user of some 40 years ago I can relate & sympathise. Imo both Minolta & Olympus were in their own ways superior to CaNikon but never really got what they deserved (I actually worked for Canon's copier division for a few years &, at least internally, they openly admitted that they weren't technically as good as many competitors but were better at marketing).
However, I would say that where Olympus' decline started was never having an AF SLR range to compete ... That's 20 years of ignoring the main SLR market.

Jeff said...

Very sad but not surprising since a lot of people have been expecting this. I guess companies are like countries. You can have lots of experts and do lots of analyses and still make a series of really bad decisions.

J Williams said...

Kirk:

I think you are being way too kind to Olympus management. Their problems are not recent. They have been mismanaged for many years now. When I saw them come out with the EM1x I was convinced they were doomed. It made no sense at all. It did not play to m43s strengths and it was essentially trying to slay Goliath with slingshot. I own several of their m43 cameras and lenses so no hate to their overall products. I haven't bought anything they produced in recent years though as most made on sense to me. The last several years were a series of baffling new releases. Some WTF like the EM1x and some very poorly warmed over rehashes like the EPL series.

Many years from now business schools will study them as a case study in how to blow a lead in a new technology (mirrorless). How to destroy any chance of success with poor product development and a host of other bad business practices.

Some are hoping they are going to be resurrected but most likely the bones are just going to be picked over for whatever they are worth. What has happened is sad, but also very predictable for years. In a way I feel no sorrow for them because they are not really a victim of the camera industry or Corona virus but a victim of their own poor management.

KB said...

Ming Thein has an interesting, slightly different take on JIP. https://blog.mingthein.com/2020/06/25/the-beginning-of-the-end/

Kirk, Photographer/Writer said...

It's always interesting to read Ming's perspective as he is in such a different market/culture than mine in Texas. I think the only point of small difference between our predictions is about what the company buying the camera division will ultimately do with it...

crduke said...

Ming's spin on this is interesting, but entirely at odds to what is being reported on DPReview. There we see reports that Oly has been shutting down production and development for months, and shopping their overseas production plants as real estate. I have no doubt that we will see new Oly branded products in the future, just as we have seen Kodak, Polaroid, Bell & Howell, Vivitar, etc.

In the meantime, I have EM1-II, lots of lenses (including 12-100) to keep me amused, and a relatively near future filled with lots of gently used Oly gear at a reasonable price. Lacking some kind of astounding breakthrough in new imaging technology (Come on Panasonic - show us some love), I can't see any reason to update.

dinksdad said...

How soon before we see blister-pack "Olympus" cameras at Target stores?

amolitor said...

Private Equity companies have web sites where they usually list their investments past and present. Generally a little followon research will reveal what their strategies turn out to be in practice.

https://jipinc.com/

and a little google translate.

Jeff Smith said...

Sadly this seems to be the end of road for Olympus cameras. And I was just about ready to jump back into Micro 4/3 world from leaving it for ASP-C sensors, first with Fuji and now with Nikon (Z50). Z50 is a very nice camera but with limited lenses unless you want to use an adapter or Full-Frame Z glass.

Based on this news I think I will get a 1” sensor compact for when I want to carry less.

Can’t help but think that Pentax will be the next to go.

Anonymous said...

There'll be a lot of bloodletting in the camera market (which was already badly in decline). In honesty I don't think that even Canon, Nikon and Fuji are safe.

As a longstanding M43 Olympus PEN user, I feel a pang of regret for Olympus as a company, but am not really worried about m43 as a system, for me. I've got all the lenses I need, and the system has all the ones I could 'want' (and which I will probably pick up over the next few years for cheap).

I still use a Bronica and an old Pentax 35mm. Cameras met sufficiency for my needs around five or six years ago. They're electronics now, and so, to an extent, disposable - but my daughter is still using my old EPL1, so there's a decade of life at least in these electronically. Hopefully Panasonic will carry on making something I can mount the lenses to for a while longer.

Sad times.

Mark

Robert Roaldi said...

I use m4/3s for some sports photography because it is fast enough for my purposes, weather-sealed and the lenses are smaller and lighter for equiv field of view. I'm a bit surprised that the sports/action world did not embrace smaller formats over the past few years. The top of line action cameras from Canon and Nikon are spectacular of course, but they and their lenses weigh a ton and cost a lot. Given that not many people print really large, pics mostly end up online, I would have thought that action shooters would have migrated to smaller formats over time, but I guess momentum and existing lens inventory carries some pull.
There are no comparable action kits in APS/C. The Nikon 1 series didn't live long enough to develop any although they were ideally situated. Their body performance would still be considered fantastic today at the expense of high ISO quality that not everyone cares about. There's enough used inventory out there that I can keep shooting m4/3s for both action and personal pleasure for a long while. It's a shame that there may not be any more development of the line. And although it's true that the new full-frame cameras from Canon and Nikon are roughly the same size as the E-M1 family (apples to oranges imo, compare them to E-M5 family instead), the lenses required for same field of view are much larger and heavier.

Bob said...

I've loved Olympus gear since my first OM-1. Sad to see this happen, but I understand. Just received this email today: "M.Zuiko ED 12-40mm F2.8 PRO Kit
New to our system or shooting with an older lens? This may be the kit for you! Pair our newest OM-D with one of our most popular zoom lenses for a fully weatherproof system, superior optics and bright f2.8 aperture.

Faithfully capture landscapes, nature scenes, portraits, and low-light shots with this versatile all-around combo.

Reg. $2499.99
NOW $2299.99. SAVE $200
A $2799.98 value"

jorge said...

Like so many others, I am saddened, but not surprised by Olympus decision to get out of the camera business. Almost surprised it did not happen sooner given the downturn in camera sales and how Olympus has struggled for a number of years. My love affair with Olympus started with an OM-1 35mm film camera, which I later replaced successively with DSLRS, culminating with the E-620 and E-3. Fit to be tied when Olympus dropped their DSLR line, I nevertheless tried their first generation of micro-four thirds, which I found so disappointing that I never bothered with later generations even though I hear they have come a long ways. Some of their most brilliant cameras were small compacts, such as the XZ-1 and the Stylus 1. Sure, the sensors were tiny (1 1/7), but coupled with fast lenses (1.8 and 2.8). These two cameras still come in handy for me, especially for international travel when one is trying to keep weight and bulk to a minimum. The Stylus 1´s 300mm equivalency, coupled with the Olympus TCON 1.7 teleconverter with no loss in f-stop, takes me out to a little over 500mm, while still maintaining a small footprint, and yet gives me image results that are no less than astonishing for such a small sensor. It is exactly this kind of innovation and ingenuity from Olympus´ glory years that I will miss.